Submitted 2 weeks ago by G4Z@feddit.uk to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
The notice reads: “Want Coca-Cola Classic? It’s one glass only.
“Based on new government laws, we’ve had to limit Coca-Cola Classic to one glass per customer.
“Still thirsty? Help yourself to any of our low-sugar fizzy Bottomless Soft Drinks.”
Under the new rules, any soft drinks that are low in sugar, for example ‘Zero’ alternative versions of most popular soft drink brands, can be drunk to one’s heart’s content.
I imagine that manufacturers of artificial sweeteners are in for a good time.
They should offer a loisence for 1 extra sugar drink if you finish your mushy peas.
So, free refills on alcohol is okay, but not sugar???
You can have free refills your beer but not your alcohol free beer lol
You can have free refills of coke if a bit of alcohol is added…
It also says no added sugar, so they should be able to refill my vodka orange as much as they want because the sugar in orange juice is natural.
What a wonderful law.
If Im ever denied my sugar water at a restaurant i will simply cry, scream, piss, shit and fart until I have my way or am forced to leave
Average hexbear user.
Although kinda based…
Ol’ Nigel is chuckling his way in the front door, ffs. What is Labour doing?
An original consultation took place during 2018 as part of the previous government’s Child Obesity action, and legislation was finally passed in Parliament in December 2021.
The rules only came into force on Wednesday (1 October 2025).
The legislation was actually passed under the Johnson government:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Johnson_ministry
I suppose that Labour could have passed a law canceling implementation, though.
Like the OSA
Tackling a major health crisis?
being the continuity tory party, their role since 1997
In order to be consistent they'll need to start charging tax per lump of sugar as well.
There already is a tax on sugary drinks
Yes... that is the topic of discussion. I'm just saying it's manifestly unfair if they apply that tax to refills of your cup at Nando's, but don't charge extra for each lump of sugar in a cup of tea.
taking away your cup in communist ingerlund
Maybe now the UK will catch on to iced tea? Free refills!
As long as there’s no sugar, because it’s only sugary drinks being banned.
One 20 floz Arizona Ice Tea has 59g of sugar (2.95g per floz), one 12 floz Coca Cola has 37g (3.08g per floz).
If you think Ice Tea is somehow healthy, I got news for you.
59 / 37 = 2
it’s double healthy
Unsweetened tea is a thing. Sugar free iced tea is a thing. Herbal iced tea is a thing.
Begone, devil.
I am failing to understand how come a choice of a person or bad parenting should be enforced. Like if a person wants to drink more of sugary drinks he likes, it is purely up to him, right? Or parents letting their children drink as much as they want. That shit is purely on a customer. Why would anyone regulate that? Focus on other things like littering, public smoking and drinking, drug selling. This hast to be one of the least important things to regulate.
They can drink as much as they like. There’s nothing stopping someone buying another drink.
Obesity is a huge public health concern that should be treated seriously and we should be steering our culture into making better health decisions.
Because 64% of adults are overweight or obese, with 26% being in the heavier classification. It’s costing the NHS £11 billion per year, and 13% of hospital admissions in 2023 were due to being overweight.
Yeah turns out people were incapable of making good decisions on their own. Which is fine, unless you’re asking everyone around you to pay for it.
Me and you (hopefully) both understand that that is not a human mistake rather than mega corpos profit-hungry strategies to hook people up on sugary drinks. Instead of limiting peoples choices, we should strafe to punish companies for their aggressive strategies towards customers. As simple as regulate how much actual sugar goes in a drink. People will complain and hopefully drink less if it is less sweet. The ones who would keep drinking would ingest less sugar. Win-win for humanity, lose-win for corpos. This new rule looks like is fighting the cause in a backwards direction.
Why the drinking and dug selling? That shit should be right there with the sugary drinks and snacks.
But yet people are still allowed to smoke?
A bill to phase out smoking is working through the parliamentary process at the moment. It will introduce a progressive ban so those aged 15 when it passes will never legally smoke, licencing for the sale of tobacco and vape products, and the power to ban smoking near hospitals and schools.
Banning near hospitals should be a good one. Beggars belief it’s not already a thing.
When I’ve been, there’s a no smoking sign in front of the entrance and several patients stood in front of it looking like death having either a giant vape or chain smoking.
How long before coca cola launch an unsweetened version and Nandos lets your Bring Your Own Bag (of sugar)?
If you put sugar in granulated or powdered solid form into soda, it’ll create a lot of convection points and the soda will rapidly foam up and lose a lot of its carbon dioxide.
You could use a sweet syrup instead.
This only affects sugary drinks, so their Zero and diet options should be exempt. Although a book I read recently was showing evidence that artificial sweeteners can also drive obesity, so we might start seeing things affecting those drinks too.
Sounds like a good ‘nudge’ law - David Cameron would be proud
Well, yeah Cameron was the one who introduced the legislation.
Does that mean the diet versions are unaffected?
If customers are allowed to help themselves then it’s totally uninforcible. It’s not like the restaurants are going to police this and a sticker isn’t going to deter anyone!
Not at all unenforcable. Just needs an RFID on the cup.
I was referring to the sticker deterrent method as outlined by the article but let’s discuss.
So, every company selling sugary drink refills has to now spend hundreds of thousands, if not millions, on new cups or tags and the associated tech to make the system work for every outlet. Then, what if I buy a coke zero then decide I want a refill of full fat? Or, visa versa? Gets a bit complicated there.
They could also have a tap behind the counter for sugary drinks and refill taps with ‘diet’ versions accessible to patrons. But again that would mean installing another bunch of taps in every outlet.
Furthermore, who’s going to be checking up on this, making sure restaurants are following the law? As it’s not a safety issue it doesn’t fall within the FSA’s remit so there’s literally no one checking up on this.
It’s a virtue signalling nothing law. Sure, you can enforce anything if you throw money at it, but this is the UK. Currently scraping the barrel in the race to the bottom. If the sticker doesn’t stop you there’s not going to be any consequences.
Probably the best solution honestly… In chain restaurants that don’t offer free refills, I quite frequently just take one anyway. Nobody ever stops me. If I asked they might say no, but I don’t ask.
Pretty much no one will ever enforce it. It will be interesting to see what happens when some jobsworth does though.
I don’t fundamentally have a problem with this personally, but it’s one more nail in the coffin full of nails that is the labour party. Their timing is impeccable, as ever.
Obesity is destroying the NHS, and not for the sake of your freedom but for the sake of keeping people addicted to product.
But i want to drink hummingbird food in large quantities in a single sitting!
Please tell me it’s just England and Wales please tell me it’s just England and Wales
Lembot_0004@discuss.online 2 weeks ago
TLDR:
The article states that this is only for sugary drinks. Non-sweet drinks are without any limits.