PhDebaters

Comments

• dmention7@midwest.social ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Sex therapists only want one thing and it’s discussing fucking.

  source
• stupidcasey@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  To treat philosophers a group as an individual capable of wanting a single thing across all is an over generalization in fact treating an individual as an individual itself is a over generalization since we consistently hold conflicting desires but before we get into that we must first ask what a “desire” itself is but that comes with the problem of what the “self” is in itself but we can’t explain that until we dive into what we are talking about when we say In but that would be semantics which I will now define in the following 500 book thesis on redefining the English language so it supports my esoteric politically biased view point because my grade school bully called me stupid when I was five.

  source

  • Dragonstaff@leminal.space ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    My esteemed colleague’s first 300 books are riveting, but at that point the argument falls apart. They fail to account for the Herman reversal: “I know you are, but what am I” (Herman et al,1985). Amusing, but hardly a work of serious scholarship.

    source

    • stupidcasey@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      YOU’RE STUPID!!!(++!((+((

      source
  • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I dunno. Sounds like you like discussing things.

    source
• neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Degenerates only want one thing and it’s disgusting fucking.

  source
• tetris11@feddit.uk ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  absolutists want one thing and one thing only, and it’s fucking annoying

  source
• kibiz0r@midwest.social ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Okay here goes: Is it morally permissible to have sex with a robot? Assume that it’s so lifelike that you can’t distinguish it from a human, except for the fact that it can’t refuse.

  source

  • thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Image

    source

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      What about the Kantian view?

      Kant believed that animals were not sentient in the same way as man and therefore did not deserve the same moral valuation. Yet, he also believed that we should not harm animals, because if you harm a creature that you can feel empathy for, you’re damaging your innate ability to care about others.

      Should a similar argument apply to sex robots?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • joyjoy@lemmy.zip ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      What if the sentient robot is programmed to have sex with me and if it’s denied sex it caused it great distress?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    How indistinguishable are we talking? Can it get pregnant? Can it get STDs? Can it’s parents be ashamed of their offspring’s choices in men?

    Also, It is probably morally permissible, but only if you feel disgusted and guilty with yourself after post-nut clarity. Walk of shame for everyone.

    source
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    “I’m just asking questions!”

    source
  • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    If we base the morality on whether there would be any harm done to any side, given everything goes as intended, and whether they are capable to communicate (even pretended) pleasure, and consent, then fuck yes, slay

    source
  • muhyb@programming.dev ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Image

    source

    • Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      He said have sex with, not date.

      source
  • vardogor@mander.xyz ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    a good presentation on that topic: youtu.be/XQcNYb3DydA

    source
  • oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humans_(TV_series)

    source
  • culpritus@hexbear.net ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    visible-disgust

    source
• logicbomb@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  truth

  source

  • homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Is it? 🤔

    source

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      What is truth?

      source
  • KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    trvthnvke, if you will

    source
• Una@europe.pub ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Why?

  source
• AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Horny philosophers want only two things

  source

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Inside you are two philosophers.

    you are airtight.

    source
• culpritus@hexbear.net ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.”

  source

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    “Only a crisis - actual or perceived - produces real change. When that crisis occurs, the actions that are taken depend on the ideas that are lying around.”

    source