neuracnu
@neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- Submitted 7 hours ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 10 hours ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 13 hours ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 1 comment
- Submitted 13 hours ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 1 comment
- Submitted 1 day ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Comment on Oscar-Nominated and Broke: Two directors nominated for Academy Awards shine a light on the worsening economics of indie film 1 day ago:
One of the fundamental goals of the !trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone community is explicitly to help surface small to medium budget films that don’t get the benefit of distribution marketing budgets.
The Red Letter Media guys just gave a glowing review to another one of these, The King Tide, whose trailer I remember posting and thinking “ok, this looks great”.
Quality, intriguing, memorable films are still being made. If you want to see them, you have to put in the work to find them.
- Comment on Hundreds of your Warner Bros DVDs probably don't work anymore 2 days ago:
I worked with the Missouri Historical Society years ago to archive some footage I’d shot of the St Louis city streetscape. It was all on digital video, but the archivists insisted on converting it to an analog medium (u-matic video tapes). Their reasoning was that all media degrades, but that analog at least degrades gracefully. Magnetic tape has the capability of sitting in storage, untouched and un-cared-for, and still be quite viewable with minimal degradation. Digital media becomes corrupted very easily, and requires constant replication and backups, which can be very expensive for massive archives. For media that may or may not ever be touched again, why not pick a medium that requires the least amount of maintenance?
Dear hiring managers: this scenario would probably make an intriguing interview question.
- Submitted 3 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 3 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 3 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 3 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 3 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 4 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 4 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 4 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 4 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 4 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 4 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 4 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 4 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 4 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 4 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 4 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 5 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 5 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 5 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 5 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Comment on AMC’s Adam Aron Slams 17- & 30-Day Theatrical Windows As Too Short, Calls Whole Topic “A Very Live Debate Right Now” 5 days ago:
He’s right. First-run theatrical venues are toast if audiences need to wait, at most, 30 days to watch movies on streaming.
That said, with the experience that AMC has turned movie-going into (cramming ads down audience’s throats), it’s no wonder people are staying home.
If you have a local movie house that doesn’t show ads, support them instead.
- Submitted 5 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments
- Submitted 5 days ago to trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone | 0 comments