I’m referring to the sh.itjustworks instance. Which one would be it? Because I’m kind of confused…
“Yes”
Submitted 19 hours ago by N00b22@lemmy.ml to [deleted]
I’m referring to the sh.itjustworks instance. Which one would be it? Because I’m kind of confused…
“Yes”
Mostly both
Some alternative , nerdy interpretations follow:
sh
: it just works. You don’t need bash
, zsh
, fish
, tcsh
or anything else, just running sh
will provide a shell environment.sh
: IT just works. Similar to the previous interpretation, but also stating that IT (Information Technology, which is meant to mean the IT department) just works with sh
.#!/bin/sh/itjustworks
shhhh. it just works.
Imagine a greasy old IT technician coming up to you, putting a finger on your lips and gently saying that after you gasped about the entangled mess of hundreds of Ethernet cables in the server room
Probably the former. I’ve seen it abbreviated as SJW, that’s unnecessary don’t do that. Am I old?
I dunno, sjw is a lot shorter than shit just works
Yeah but… SJW means something else lmfao
Shell it just works
It’s “S Hit Just Works” and it’s the slapping car meme.
The “S” is because the car salesman has a slight lisp.
Slaps Instance this bad boy just works.
Hmmm. What if it’s because the admin was an old school Linux user and never took to bash. “sh. it just works”.
Shit just works - forever and always.
(shh, it just works and shit just works are both valid - the intent was the former IIRC - but the latter is obviously the superior choice. I’m also partial to sh.it.heads to refer to users [cheeky, but thought about in the same way as Deadheads for Grateful Dead fans])
I pronounce it “this post hidden due to instance block settings”.
Any reason you have blocked the instance?
The general trend of the behaviour of the userbase when it first began appearing. I’m pretty block-happy. I’m sure it’s an over-generalisation but I’ve learned over the years that I’d rather miss out than feel constantly annoyed.
because they didn’t censor the bad word?
I always assumed that it was supposed to be ambiguous between them for humor purposes
Shhhhhhh…^^itjustworks
Shhh… we don’t ask such things around here… it just works ™ that way…
Why not both?
Its:
“shhh… nothing is broken, ignore all the bugs and pretend it all just works, mm’kay?”
sh.itjust.works
“it just works”
The “Sh” is silent…
or at least very quiet
Since DNS is hierarchical, it could be set up so that they both work.
Yes
I always read it as
ess heych dot it just works
unacceptable
Id put it in the words of god Howard:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPN0qhSyWy8
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 13 hours ago
I’ve always read it as “shit just works”. Why would the “sh” be there if we weren’t supposed to read it?
otp@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
No, it’s a comforting “sh” like “shhhhh”, don’t worry, it just works.
It’s only one h for the double entendre.
/joking