Freud

Comments

• zqwzzle@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Freudian slip: where you say one thing but mean your mother.

  source

  • nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    ![This comic, titled “Freudian Slip” by Luke McGarry, has two panels.

    Panel 1: A man resembling Sigmund Freud walks down a hallway, unaware of a banana peel on the ground.

    Panel 2: He nearly slips on the banana peel and exclaims, “WHOOPS! I ALMOST SLIPPED ON THIS COCK!”](…blahaj.zone/…/c11cd7cc-4118-4ae5-bdc0-5f493ffd52…)

    source
  • Hexarei@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I’ve always heard it as “Where you mean to say one thing but fuck your mother”

    source
• RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Is there a version with less pixels? I can still read some of the bigger texts.

  source

  • OpenStars@discuss.online ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    As requested: one pixel.

    img

    source

    • casmael@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      you can tell its been photoshopped the colour is off

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I like the subtle yet complex statement the artist manages to transmit.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • GraniteM@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Image

    source

    • casmael@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Thanks but still a bit excessive - resolution doesn’t grow on trees you know

      source
  • The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You say pixels, but what you mean is penis.

    source

    • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I … I admit it. It’s penii am the way down.

      source
  • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Here’s the link to the artist’s site: existentialcomics.com/comic/255

    source

    • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Tyvm. Updating.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Did you say… MORE pixels?

    Image

    source

    • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      MOAR

      Image

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • henfredemars@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    My pixel plan only includes 800 pixels for the week. Please try to be more responsible with my pixels in the future.

    source
• Anticorp@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  He definitely had a thing for mothers too, so it’s weird that he’s disagreeing with her in the last cell.

  source

  • Zehzin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    If it was a man instead of a woman the problem would be the mother.

    source
• Godric@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Since OP neglected to credit the artist:

  existentialcomics.com

  Great comics about the depressed philandering cokeheads who shaped much of modern philosophy!

  source
• Darkard@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I tried to wipe my phone screen twice looking at this before I realised it’s just been repeatedly jpeged

  source

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Well loved.

    source
  • nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Image

    source
  • UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    it’s crystal clear for me tho

    source
• Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It’s kind of ironic that Freud came up with this weird theory considering autogynephilia is more common in men than autoandrophilia is in women: The Prevalence of Paraphilic Interests in the Czech Population: Preference, Arousal, the Use of Pornography, Fantasy, and Behavior

  source

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Science facts I question why you know, for 500$, Ragdoll.

    source

    • Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      But in case you’re curious about the actual answer

      A while back I was doing some research on the prevalence of different paraphilias, and this was one of the few large representative studies I came across. There’s one more from Canada, but they didn’t ask about autogynephilia/androphilia

      source
    • Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Reasons…

      Image

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Autogynephilia is an outdated, thoroughly debunked term btw. Find some reading below:
    en.wikipedia.org/…/Blanchard's_transsexualism_typ…
    pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20582803/
    www.tandfonline.com/doi/…/15532739.2010.514223
    journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/…/0038026120934690
    …medium.com/making-sense-of-autogynephilia-debate…
    thepinknews.com/…/five-lies-terfs-tell-about-the-…
    …medium.com/making-sense-of-autogynephilia-debate…
    medium.com/…/why-are-trans-women-penalized-for-bo…
    genderanalysis.net/…/alice-dreger-autogynephilia-…
    crossdreamers.com/…/the-autogynephilia-theory-deb… archive.is/fw208

    source

    • barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It’s quite clear by now that it has practically nothing to do with gender incongruence, i.e. trans folks, doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist as a paraphilia. That is, just because Blanchard got his theory wrong based on incomplete data and probably a good dose of being born into certain social construct doesn’t mean that no cis men get aroused at the thought of them as a woman. It is, as the study in the comment you replied to shows, actually quite common.

      Gotta distinguish between the phenomenon auto[gyno/andro]philia (exists), Blanchard’s interpretation wrt. trans folks, (falsified), and TERFs (hateful anti-science assclowns). Otherwise we’d be kink shaming.

      source
  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Many of Freud’s early patients were dissatisfied housewives. I have no difficulty believing he accidentally discovered trans men and came to the conclusion all women wish they have a penis. Hirschfeld he was not.

    source
• niktemadur@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  In a society where women were repressed into a very narrowly defined role with no room for deviation, the other half enjoyed an attitude of “boys will be boys” and could behave “freely” from their perspective, within a less narrow but no less rigid societal constrain.

  Women were literally prohibited, or at least severely frowned upon, to embark on a myriad activities that were acceptable and expected for men. Women were literally prohibited from entering many physical spaces, and were expected to be confined to other spaces - like the kitchen, the parlor and the tea room.

  I guess it was impossible even for Freud to see how “penis envy” might have been, at root, “I wish I was a man so I could escape this narrow set of rules I was born and peer-pressured into, with no choice by me, I wish I was free” (not quite free, just “less trapped”).

  source
• Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Penis science!

  Its a bit rough at the campus, but the science building has great architecture! So very tall!
  But we mustn’t forget about the two buildings beside it. Never neglect those or you won’t get a PhD (pretty huge dick).

  source
• MovingThrowaway@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Freud was all about building interesting models for human consciousness, then using them to come to the wildest conclusions.

  Tbf, with the sexually repressed and patriarchal society he was working in, there may have been some truth to the complexes he described. But to try and universalize them was a mistake imo.

  Some interpret “penis envy” as a purely symbolic metaphor for envying the power and freedom given to men, with the inverse “castration anxiety” being fear of losing said power.

  Freud hypothesized the subconscious had its own logic that was more about association than rational connection.

  source
• RobotZap10000@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  We’re gonna be talking about the PENIS!

  source

  • IndiBrony@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Do you think that’s funny, Butt-Head?

    source
  • weevai@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    And the vagina! And MASTURBATION!

    source
• geography082@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I would suggest the autor to read or at least study psychology before giving this humorous statement

  source
• Rubisco@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Enough to kill a small horse.

  source
• dogsnest@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Freud studied the Old Testament, you say?

  source