Grandpa don't know shit
Submitted 1 year ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/a7022ccb-ce49-454c-a329-172ee233667c.jpeg
Comments
MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Me, making memes only my PhD advisor will understand:
DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 year ago
Biology majors right now thinking to themselves, “sure, this seems funny.”
Death_Equity@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Primitive. It doesn’t even resolve the dimensionality with a recursive holographic topology and completely ignores gravity as a dispersion of sum total energy across the surface defined by the boundaries between permutative waveforms.
Ooga booga, string go brrr.
CluckN@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The only Lagrangian action grandpa is going to see is my 4’ vertical after I dunk on his dusty ass.
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
The older Erik Per Sullivan gets the more amusing I find this meme.
So you don’t need to look, he’s 32.
marcos@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Superstrings of past’s future.
fckreddit@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
I have no idea what any of this means. Assuming that it is related to string theory.
Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
In reality the question is a cultural contrast of androgynous terms with respect to the Lagrangian quantum field casuistry orientation. Perhaps exogenous parameters should be considered with respect to Socratic philosophy, at least with respect to the genesis of this question from a position of initiation of ancient thought. I do not believe that quantum telluric hermeneutics transverts the anothertic peripatetics of archaic philosophy for the factual iniquity of non-dogmatic BS dialogues I do not want to finish my contribution to your interesting meme without recommending the book: “The sidereal feeling of past constellations”, there we delve deeper into the quantum philosophy applied to the uniqueness of the Spanish chickpea, perhaps it will be of interest to you…
wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Is this in reference to a real theory? If so, you have my attention.
mumblerfish@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Depends on what you mean by “real”. As in " corresponds to physical reality", no. As in “a real model which people are researching”, yes.
wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
I never mean the first one when discussing math.
iiGxC@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
Hold on let me dust off my vx rig to try this out
jaemo@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Save it for the C-Z Polis, citizen. I don’t have the shaper to emit tags for a gestalt like this.
SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I like thinking that ala of universe is just information.
nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 1 year ago
What does this mean in simple terms
OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Lagrangian quantum field theory is much better fight me
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 1 year ago
Image