Grandpa don't know shit
Submitted 8 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/a7022ccb-ce49-454c-a329-172ee233667c.jpeg
Comments
MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Socsa@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Me, making memes only my PhD advisor will understand:
DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 8 months ago
Biology majors right now thinking to themselves, “sure, this seems funny.”
Death_Equity@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Primitive. It doesn’t even resolve the dimensionality with a recursive holographic topology and completely ignores gravity as a dispersion of sum total energy across the surface defined by the boundaries between permutative waveforms.
Ooga booga, string go brrr.
CluckN@lemmy.world 8 months ago
The only Lagrangian action grandpa is going to see is my 4’ vertical after I dunk on his dusty ass.
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 8 months ago
The older Erik Per Sullivan gets the more amusing I find this meme.
So you don’t need to look, he’s 32.
marcos@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Superstrings of past’s future.
fckreddit@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
I have no idea what any of this means. Assuming that it is related to string theory.
Zerush@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
In reality the question is a cultural contrast of androgynous terms with respect to the Lagrangian quantum field casuistry orientation. Perhaps exogenous parameters should be considered with respect to Socratic philosophy, at least with respect to the genesis of this question from a position of initiation of ancient thought. I do not believe that quantum telluric hermeneutics transverts the anothertic peripatetics of archaic philosophy for the factual iniquity of non-dogmatic BS dialogues I do not want to finish my contribution to your interesting meme without recommending the book: “The sidereal feeling of past constellations”, there we delve deeper into the quantum philosophy applied to the uniqueness of the Spanish chickpea, perhaps it will be of interest to you…
wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Is this in reference to a real theory? If so, you have my attention.
mumblerfish@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Depends on what you mean by “real”. As in " corresponds to physical reality", no. As in “a real model which people are researching”, yes.
wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
I never mean the first one when discussing math.
iiGxC@slrpnk.net 8 months ago
Hold on let me dust off my vx rig to try this out
jaemo@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Save it for the C-Z Polis, citizen. I don’t have the shaper to emit tags for a gestalt like this.
SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I like thinking that ala of universe is just information.
nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 8 months ago
What does this mean in simple terms
OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Lagrangian quantum field theory is much better fight me
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 8 months ago
Image