you have to subscribe to the dictionary now

Comments

• lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Hi! With the OED, it has been like that at least since I started university in 2007. However, lots of public libraries have subscriptions. I just go to my library website, login, and follow the link to the OED. There are many other reference tools that are also included in my library card. Libraries rule!

  source

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Instructions crystal clear, researching etymology of 500-year-old words 😍

    Image

    Thanks San Francisco Public Library!

    source

    • erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      2005 Yes I’m getting a crystal clear picture on this new video phone

      Press X to doubt.

      source
• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  You can still buy the book or access the site via most libraries.

  I get that it’s a bit annoying, but I’m guessing you’d also be annoyed about an ad-ridden, data-harvesting dictionary.

  The Oxford English Dictionary is without a doubt the most well-researched, comprehensive, and linguistically complete English dictionary on Earth, bar none. It perhaps is the most well-researched and comprehensive dictionary of all languages, but I wouldn’t know.

  It’s laid out in an unusual way and even has words and alternate meanings that haven’t been used for centuries. It’s not meant to be a general-purpose dictionary, it’s niche and predominantly for linguistic experts or people fascinated by language.

  An unbelievable amount of research goes into it, and those people deserve to be paid.

  There are dozens of freely-available general-purpose dictionaries out there if you want them.

  source

  • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I was annoyed, like the OP, then I read your comment and now I’m impressed and have an urge to buy a copy of OED I most certainly will never open. They owe you a commission on my sale.

    source

    • stoly@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      A copy will literally fill a shelf. It comes in volumes with addenda releases periodically.

      source
• KISSmyOS@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  what a joke

  In the past, you had to buy the book. Or go to the library to read it.
  Both of which you can still do. And with a library membership you can access the web version as well.

  How else do you expect the authors of the dictionary to pay their rent?

  source

  • Donkter@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    With ads! Wait, I also dislike those… They should figure it out for themselves!

    source

    • Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      They did, they put up a paywall 🙂

      source
• saltesc@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The OED has never been free. Go buy a copy and you’ll know why.

  source

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    In spite of the undeniable truth that the Oxford English Dictionary is a magnificent and exhaustive source of information on the etymology and meaning of the English language, it is my personal inclination to favor their compendium of synonyms and antonyms, which I prefer to other possibilities for their rich collection of words with similar or opposite meanings.

    source

    • saltesc@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I use Power Thesaurus lol

      source
  • swayevenly@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I bought a copy and I’m still wondering why.

    source

    • vormadikter@startrek.website ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Then maybe open it and read a bit?

      source
• hellfire103@sopuli.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  If you’re after an online dictionary, I personally like Wiktionary.

  source

  • grue@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Yep, only copyleft services (of which Wiktionary is one) can be trusted not to be paywalled or otherwise subverted in the long run.

    source
• stoly@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Wasn’t it always a subscription? You really would only have easy access in a university library.

  source
• Veedem@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It’s an extensively researched and informative book, much more so than other dictionaries. That information gathering process has to be paid for somehow.

  source
• cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Cambridge dictionary is free.

  source
• beatensoup@baraza.africa ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Here is an alternative that aggregates from multiple sources: www.thefreedictionary.com

  While I do not oppose paying for definitions, there is someone confusing about collectively generated meaning being packed by one company for profit. A publicly maintained dictionary is a much much better alternative. I guarantee it would be more versatile and rigorous than this Oxford stuff.

  source

  • Hawke@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It’s a good thing there are lots of other dictionaries than the OED then.

    source
• possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  There are plenty of other dictionaries and some of them are made of something called paper.

  source

  • Gestrid@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    What is… “pah-per”?

    source

    • IDriveWhileTired@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That’s the stuff Bill Buttlicker was trying to buy from that rude salesperson.

      source
• where_am_i@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  If the dictionary was free for all, how do you, OP, envision it would finance itself.

  Specifically: hosting, web design, keeping the dictionary up to date (new words, linguistic shift, new entomological research etc).

  Please, elaborate. Until then you’re a choosing beggar.

  source

  • Moof_Kenubi@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    probably something like this

    source

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      And, how much did OP donate to wikimedia foundation last year?

      source
• serpineslair@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I personally use collins english dictionary. It’s the best online dictionary I’ve found (best descriptions).

  source
• cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  thats not bad actually. joey tribbiani had to pay $20 and he only got the v words

  source
• mateomaui@reddthat.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  $29.95 a month? ok.

  Surprised Wikipedia hasn’t put something like this is place yet. Maybe their end-year donations push brings in enough to hold it off.

  source

  • stoly@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The OED is like 150 years old with literally thousands of people scouring every possible source of English for any possible permutation of every word ever. It’s a reference for specialists, not public consumption.

    source

    • mateomaui@reddthat.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yet every unusual entry I thought to look up says this:

      Image

      Some aren’t even that complicated or lengthy to define. As a specialist who would possibly use it, not terribly impressed.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I think Cambridge dictionary is free.

  source
• letsgo@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It works OK for me, but I’m in the UK so maybe it’s subscription only for foreigners.

  source
• boyi@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  One way to get access to OED without paying a cent is by using kindle app. When you highlight an English word, if will open the dict. You can search for any word from there.

  source
• Mr_Blott@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I just paid a one off fee for the Chambers app. It’s just as comprehensive

  source
• Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The unabridged OED has never been cheap to buy. I’m honestly surprised it took this long.

  source
• Kallioapina@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  FYI Running Ublock Origin is enough to grant access to this dictionary, among others. At least seems to work for me without any paywalls (unless its a geoblock? I’m looking at it from the Nordics).

  source