New Vegas is the McChicken?
…has the McChicken helped people realize they’re trans?!?
Submitted 2 days ago by cm0002@lemmings.world to greentext@sh.itjust.works
https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/72c5ab01-7c77-47f8-b9fa-745e1ea76dbe.png
New Vegas is the McChicken?
…has the McChicken helped people realize they’re trans?!?
Has New Vegas?
There are some themes of identity and perception of body and female super mutants, which are ideas that resonate with trans people.
Source: I have body dysmorphia, and spend time on the shitposty parts of blahaj.zone
There are a ton of eggs that have been broken by way of playing New Vegas.
I mean, probably? There’s a lot of chemicals involved.
An environmental study would have to rule out exposure to fighting games.
My interpretation based on how my body handles McDonald’s food. Let me know if this matches up with what they are going for?
quality shitpost
Yeah, this aggresively does not make sense.
They got the idea that fallout 4 is the worst, which is what matters.
This feels really insulting to New Vegas, FO1 and FO2. Those (and Tactics but that’s not in the chart) would be gourmet burgers if not prime rib/filet mignon.
they are ribs. they got bones, but like you expect them and plan to eat around them. and if you add your own sauces damn are they good
I don’t know why, but I get it.
Ah jeez now I have to play new vegas again.
Yes, Americans do. I get this.
I get the idea, but the way it’s used here seems atrocious. Is Fallout 3 even that big compared to the other titles?
Fallout 3 is a weird one because it’s definitely a good game and a halfway decent RPG at least on the same level as Oblivion; but as a fan of Fallout prior to its release, it doesn’t give any of the same vibes as Fallout. Different sense of humor, different cultural things since it’s set on the otherside of the country as the originals, and kinda just feels like a serial killer murdered Fallout and wore its skin like a suit.
If it was called something else, I think I would have more fondness toward it.
It was enjoyable enough, I liked certain parts of it quite a bit. A decent number of the quests had interesting elements, although there were very few of them. The gameplay was okay, and I'm glad that New Vegas kept almost all of it. The map was annoying as hell to get around, which annoyed me a bit. The start of the game was the best of any of the open world games in my opinion. Some of the main quest was a little boring, but I loved the simulated town, it was probably the most fun I had in the game. It was a bit grittier than Fallout 4 ended up being, which was both a good thing and a bad thing.
My more controversial opinion is that Fallout 4 has significantly better content than 3. The locations have a lot more interesting bits of lore. Some of the sidequests are a bit more fun to play through. The companions have a lot more depth. The main quests were worse though. By a lot.
True, 3 is definitely worth playing, and I could never really get into Fallout1+2 (I like isometric RPGs, but the old Fallouts are kinda clunky and I prefer my turn-based combat to be party-based). But even from my couple of hours playing Fallout1+2, it’s very clear that the vibe is completely different from the Bethesda-owned installments.
it was the one that turned it into a 3d. also NV had better perks. I cannot get TTW to work on my PC for some reason but I really want to give 3 a try with that.
It's significantly smaller than 4, by an insane amount. I'd say that in terms of content, it has slightly less than New Vegas, but significantly less depth. It's worth playing, but ehhhh.
Fallout 3 was massively popular for its time. I think the burgers are going for quality though, not numbers.
Burger
Old MacDonalds had a pharm…
winkledinkle@sh.itjust.works 13 hours ago
Im so American that I immediately got it.
Send help.
DupaCycki@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Your Doordash driver here. Help has been sent. I’m at your door.
winkledinkle@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
I tried registering my door dash driver as a service animal and they said no. :(