I wonder about the source of this image. She looks horribly uncomfortable…
After the 6th payment the burrito is mine 💀💀💀
Submitted 5 hours ago by Tundra_Lifeform@piefed.social to [deleted]
https://media.piefed.social/posts/Ob/vz/ObvzDF74bx6Nphi.jpeg
Comments
gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
aeronmelon@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
The are actors playing wrestling in a scripted reality series
gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
Thanks!
But, wait… The guy in the OG Bro Explaining me is not Adam Sandler?!
Diddlydee@feddit.uk 2 hours ago
It looks set up unlike the original.
gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 hour ago
Turns out it is set-up, actually.
Zwiebel@feddit.org 4 hours ago
Still false, you own the token representing the monkey but not the monkey itself
FishFace@piefed.social 4 hours ago
The correct understanding of NFTs has always been trivial: they’re certificates. What they certify is not determined.
Anyone telling you anything else is either lying, or a moron (or has been lied to, which is not incompatible with being a moron).
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 hour ago
It’s a bitcoin that can’t be swapped for other bitcoins, right?
spicytuna62@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Replace “token” with “title” and “monkey” with “car,” and you’ve got a formula most people understand.
I own the title, but I don’t own the car.
Unlike the monkey, you can go find the car in the real world.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
But eventually you own the car. You never own the monkey.
ICastFist@programming.dev 3 hours ago
Nooo bro, I totally OWN that jay-peg bro, you can look it up bro, the token is non fungible bro, do you even know what that means, bro?