Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

They removed the like button. What next, they gonna remove videos? It’s just gonna be ads???

⁨101⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨jia_tan@lemmy.blahaj.zone⁩ to ⁨[deleted]⁩

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/36028aba-a006-45f8-9b7a-7d245c52863e.webp

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Zoom in a little more. I can’t see what it says.

    source
    • lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Image

      source
      • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Ok thanks.

        source
    • colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      op using nuclear it’s erous and bad for the environment

      No.

      8g CO2/kWh

      43g CO2/kWh

      source
      • Naich@lemmings.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        There’s nothing more erous about nuclear then it being used by op.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    At least removing the like button isn’t as bad as posting images with parts of the text cut off.

    source
  • flamingos@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You can hit share, more, Firefox and then hold the image to download the original image, btw.

    source
    • tomiant@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Can’t do shit on the app tho.

      source
  • Janx@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I can’t even read this shit. You really have to steal and then crop out where it came from this bad!?

    source
  • richardwallass@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    France’s Naarea, a nuclear startup, has filed for a suspension of payments as a protective measure while it seeks new financing, indicating financial difficulties in the sector. This situation reflects broader challenges faced by the nuclear industry in France, which is undergoing significant changes and investments.

    source
    • 4am@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      AI-ass answer

      source
      • richardwallass@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Doesn’t make difference that this project is dead and a total waste of money

        source
  • tkk13909@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I love Kyle Hill

    source
  • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I love how people act like german government is against nuclear. When the actual situation is the following:

    Reality:

    1. Yes, Nuclear is not popular with the German public and might not for good reasons
    2. The German nuclear power plants were planned to shutdown and weren’t maintained to continue to run for a long time.
    3. Continue to run the nuclear power plants would require a lot of investment
    4. Germany is and was moving towards renewable energies for independence of nuclear and Russian gas anyway.
    5. Building new nuclear power plants take years.
    6. Germany choose to invest in renewable energy instead.
    7. Germany doesn’t have mines for nuclear materials to run a nuclear power plant independently, unlike France.
    8. Germany has domestic coal. Germany has coal power plants. Germany can run coal power plants independently. That is important for the military.
    9. So germany chose a bit more coal short term; and coal and nuclear free future. Germany is literally uses less coal now than ever.

    So germany has been reducing nuclear, coal and natural gas power usage.

    Image

    source
    • bigmamoth@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      the cope is unreal.

      nuclear is the cleanest and most sure energy method of production proportionaly to the enrgy produce by it and by a long mile. You were convinced by stupid ecology ideals ( russian propaganda) to not invest in anything except for unreliable and intermitent energy production cause you could always burn russian gaz. if it wasnt the case nord stream 1 and 2 wouldnt exist. You still produce and pollute a lot with coal, France it s litteraly 100x less coal.

      1 you give no reason why nuclear bad 2 no vision of the future 3 no vision of the future + no money 4 yeah how independance from russia is going ? archive.is/p9noZ 5 no vision of future + no money 6 no vision of future 7 yeah talk me about all the uranium mine in france 8 yeah cause uranium isnt well known to have an ultra high energy dencity and you can’t procure it 9 yeah and it s dumb and it cost highly for lmittle to no benefice

      wp germany

      source
      • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I love how I never said nuclear was bad but gave the reasons of the German government.

        Talk about cope.

        en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining_in_France

        France has stopped. But they can easily pick it up again.

        Fucking hell.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • UltraBlack@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I’m pretty sure kyle hill is getting paid by nuclear power companies. He’s constantly shilling

    source
    • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Shilling? My brother in christ, it is quite literally the only way forward. Fossil fuels are killing us, and will continue to do so. Wind and solar just aren’t enough. Hydro and geo energies aren’t available everywhere.

      There is no shilling, there is only desperate pleading for us to pull our heads out of our asses and do something.

      source
      • black0ut@pawb.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Nuclear is not economically feasible and still does have its fair share of problems. It also generates waste, even if at far less scale than fossil fuels. Wind and solar are cheap and very scalable in most countries, which makes them economically feasible (and can also accelerate a move from fossil). Don’t be so quick to discard them.

        As a matter of fact, last month, in Spain, we generated more energy just from wind than from nuclear. (31.7% vs 21.4%) source

        source
      • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Wind and solar just aren’t enough.

        Wind + solar + storage is both enough and beating nuclear at this point, and by the time the next nuclear power plant actually manages to get online, the calculation will be even further in favour of that mix, on account of the absolutely plummeting cost of storage, which is following the same trend as solar used to, with costs reductions >98%. Not to mention the built-in resilience you get from having a more widely distributed instead of having a few nodes producing the lion’s share of your power.

        I don’t have any ideological opposition to nuclear. If you manage to build it without massive subsidies and taking care of your waste, feel free to build them. That’s happening in exactly 0 places worldwide though.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Deme@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        There’s no world where you could build more nuclear at the rate that would be required to fix things. It’s expensive as hell and there’s not enough skilled people to go around to build all of it globally.

        source
    • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I must be a shill to.

      source
  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    IMO: Wind/Solar > Nuclear (no Rosatom) > Fossil > No power > Nuclear (Rosatom)

    source
  • Denjin@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    ors ro ve

    source
    • tomiant@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Gasp!

      source
  • Gonzako@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I’d love nuclear in my country and making nukes is a great plus too

    source
  • oneser@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    And who’s gonna give us that sweet, sweet yellow cake? :)

    source