ZkhqrD5o
@ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
- Comment on US education 17 hours ago:
That is really clever. Soften them up slowly but surely. Infest their world view with this nonsense and then one day they will be ready for the sales pitch.
- Comment on US education 1 day ago:
I refuse to believe that anyone can be this incompetent. What is the strategy here? How would religious extremists profit from creating the “myth” of electricity? I’m more confused than anything else, honestly.
- Comment on preferences 1 day ago:
No, this isn’t “your bad”. It’s AMD’s. If they actually were interested in providing competition, they would have a money printer on their hands. But well, carrying on as usual without any sort of investment or risk of failure is also a modus operandi that many companies follow quite successfully. If Intel doesn’t kick their arse, they won’t lift a finger. Simple efficiency, right?
- Comment on preferences 1 day ago:
rocm.docs.amd.com/…/system-requirements.html
Click on the footnote next to the 9070 XT.
- Comment on preferences 1 day ago:
I’ve been running PopOS with an RTX 3080 for years now and I’m absolutely happy and zero chance of switching back to this Microsoft trash.
I have a problem with how AMD handles their software called “Rocm”. It’s basically AMD’s version of CUDA and it’s a complete mess. It’s ambiguous which cards are supported and which aren’t. They have gotten better with this problem over the past few years. But for example, their latest private customer graphics card is only supported on Ubuntu. Other products are only supported on other distros. Some cards, who aren’t even listed as supported, are very well supported in all distros. That’s what I mean, it’s a mess. Essentially, the only way to find out is take the bullet and plug it in, see what happens. I mean, Nvidia is a trash company that makes Apple and Microsoft look like saints. But at least, if you buy one of their products, you know it runs CUDA. No support matrix needed. Everything, no matter how old it is, supports CUDA. The company and their graphics cards are still trash though. Unless you buy the most expensive model, of course. Then all of your problems miraculously go away. cries in 10GB VRAM
- Comment on Enjoy it while you can 1 day ago:
All is relative.
- Comment on I like him. 1 day ago:
Disagree. They have more of that “blood sucking parasite” look going on, especially with that smile.
- Comment on I like him. 1 day ago:
Why do they smile like body snatchers?
- Comment on preferences 1 day ago:
If I’m going to build a new computer, I’d like to use an AMD GPU. Problem is, they treat their GPU software like the red-headed stepchild of the family.
- Comment on NO! I don't want to download your app and set up an account. Leave me alone 1 day ago:
I want to get this off my chest. I hate Google especially for trying to block JPEG XL. What’s it with forcing video codecs into image formats? AVIF and Webp are objectively inferior to JPEG XL in every single way. Well, I can explain that myself. The guy who made the AVIF format has his feelings hurt by user choice. Can you imagine all of the bandwidth and power savings if CDNs could actually use the format that they’d like to use?
- Comment on I choose to believe, what I was programmed to believe! 1 day ago:
Where art thou money, Sanhedrin?
- Comment on Sad but true 2 days ago:
Found my new Lawyer. I think I found my new lawyer. I believe I have located and selected a lawyer who seems suitable for my needs. After a thorough search and consideration of several candidates, I am inclined to believe I have found a lawyer who appears well-suited to represent me. Following an extensive evaluation process involving multiple consultations and reviews of qualifications, I am of the opinion that I have identified a legal professional who possesses the necessary expertise and experience to effectively address my concerns. As a result of a diligent and painstaking process involving careful assessment of numerous potential legal representatives, including thorough background checks, detailed interviews, and a comprehensive review of their professional track records and client testimonials, I have reached the preliminary conclusion that I may have successfully identified a legal counsel whose skill set, experience, and commitment to client advocacy appear exceptionally aligned with the specific complexities of my situation. Subsequent to an exhaustive and meticulously executed undertaking, wherein I undertook a rigorous comparative analysis of a multiplicity of prospective legal advisors, encompassing in-depth due diligence regarding their respective professional credentials, a series of comprehensive consultations designed to ascertain their suitability for my particular legal circumstances, and a thorough perusal of peer reviews and client feedback, I am presently inclined to posit the hypothesis that I have, in fact, identified an individual possessing the requisite acumen, dedication, and jurisprudential understanding to serve as my legal representative moving forward, thereby instilling in me a burgeoning sense of confidence in the forthcoming proceedings. Subsequent to the commencement and diligent prosecution of a protracted and extraordinarily meticulous investigative undertaking, characterized by an exhaustive exploration of the legal marketplace and the comprehensive vetting of a multitude of potential legal advisors—a process which incorporated rigorous background investigations, exhaustive consultations designed to ascertain the alignment between their specialized expertise and the nuanced particulars of my unique legal circumstance, a scrupulous examination of published legal scholarship, peer-reviewed assessments, and a wide array of client testimonials—I am now tentatively inclined to posit the hypothesis that I have, after considerable deliberation and due diligence, successfully identified an individual possessing the requisite combination of legal acumen, unwavering ethical rectitude, and demonstrable experience in navigating the often-labyrinthine complexities of the legal system, thereby inspiring within me a burgeoning sense of confidence that their judicious counsel and diligent representation will prove instrumental in achieving a favorable resolution to the ongoing legal matter and ensuring the vigorous protection of my fundamental rights and interests within the framework of the established legal order. In the wake of a protracted and exceptionally meticulous undertaking, initiated with the express purpose of identifying a legal professional capable of providing astute and comprehensive representation in a matter of considerable personal significance, I have diligently pursued a multifaceted investigative strategy encompassing a thorough exploration of the legal profession, a systematic evaluation of numerous potential candidates, and an exhaustive scrutiny of their respective qualifications, professional backgrounds, and demonstrated capabilities. This rigorous vetting process involved not only an in-depth analysis of their academic credentials and bar admissions but also a comprehensive review of their professional experience, including a meticulous examination of their case outcomes, client testimonials, and published legal commentary, as well as numerous consultations designed to ascertain the congruence between their legal philosophy, approach to client advocacy, and the specific nuances and complexities inherent in the unique circumstances of my current legal predicament. Furthermore, I have meticulously researched relevant legal precedents, examined judicial rulings, and considered the potential legal ramifications of various courses of action, all in an effort to ensure that the individual ultimately selected possesses the requisite knowledge, skill, and experience to effectively navigate the often-intricate and adversarial legal landscape. Consequently, and following a period of careful deliberation and thoughtful consideration, I am now cautiously optimistic – albeit tempered by a healthy dose of legal pragmatism – that I have, through a process characterized by exhaustive due diligence and unwavering commitment to securing the highest caliber of legal representation, successfully identified an individual whose expertise, integrity, and dedication to client advocacy appear exceptionally well-suited to champion my interests and vigorously pursue a just and equitable outcome within the framework of the established legal system, thereby instilling in me a renewed sense of confidence and anticipation regarding the forthcoming proceedings.
I don’t know why people hate LLMs, they are like having your own middle-manager.
- Comment on The Emmet Bar in Toronto, Ontario introduced coasters made from the scrap metal of cars that were involved in DUIs as a reminder to the effects of impaired and drunk driving 2 days ago:
Cool idea, not a shitpost though.
- Comment on Too bad we can't have good public transportation 3 days ago:
You know, I’ve been thinking about this a lot. And your comment reminds me of it. The aesthetics of evil. Racist segregation is an obvious evil. So if you tell black people to stand at the back of the bus because they’re not allowed to mix with the whites, that’s rather obvious and a horrific picture to have. But, if you handicap them, make sure they can only live in the cheapest communities and then limit the mobility of them. Same result. But because you didn’t see it, and the enforced segregation is rather subtle… Well, looks better, doesn’t it? So people are more likely to accept it. And if you say things like “The city has marked this black community unfit for investment.” then it sounds already like a conspiracy theory. Making you the weirdo for speaking out. Horrid, but an elegant and efficient system for censorship, isn’t it?
And to be absolutely clear: I reject racial segregation and censorship, obviously.
- Comment on When the government forces you to act like a clown for no apparent reason 3 days ago:
I’m doubtful that this would solve anything, because for example in the case of Israel, the explosives went through multiple independent security theatres, and the PETN still successfully arrived at the victims. Like, if it happens once, okay, maybe it’s a fluke, but if it happens multiple times throughout the supply chain and every single time it’s A-okay, that’s a problem. Israel heavily relied on regular commercial transport for their bombs. There were countless instances where they could have been stopped, but they weren’t. And that is a worrying signal.
And even if all explosives would be detected with perfect accuracy, from now on, it still would be vulnerable to other points of attack. Just pay off a throwaway goon squad, let them smuggle ceramic weapons in their trousers into an aeroplane, and there you go. And I do believe Mossad and the FSB can come up with better ideas than that. IMO, there needs to be a more effective alternative, than this security theater nonsense.
- Comment on The perfect job doesn’t exi… 3 days ago:
NObODy wAnTs TO WorK anYMoRe.
- Comment on When the government forces you to act like a clown for no apparent reason 3 days ago:
Casual reminder: Materials such as magnesium or PETN are perfect for smuggling through airport security. Reason being, they only show up as an anorganic material in the x-ray thanks to their density. They lack any sort of smell that dogs could detect as well. Israel and Russia have used both of these successfully for terrorist attacks in the past, all of the explosives have been smuggled successfully through the security theater. Israel sent pagers with 2g of PETN in the batteries to Hezbollah and Russia wanted to get a magnesium explosive onto an DHL aeroplane to make it detonate during flight.
In both of these cases, the airport “security” did absolutely nothing to stop this. Better empty your bags everyone, because you are the security risk. Once you start allowing this type of nonsense, it will stick around forever.
- Comment on toasty 3 days ago:
Get the liquidators! They have found a second elephant’s foot.
- Comment on owo senpai 1 week ago:
If in doubt, add carbon.
- Comment on MILLIPEDE FACTS 1 week ago:
SASUKE !!!
- Comment on The long hard road 1 week ago:
Average Wuhan resident be like:
- Comment on Think about it 1 week ago:
Same thing if you are a child around President Donald Trump.
- Comment on Toxic community 1 week ago:
They are not pregnant, they get prolactin, which you can buy at every pharmacy. It works on men as well.
- Comment on I'm doing my part 1 week ago:
When you realise there’s a list that names every sex offender in the USA and they can’t legally bear arms. :)
- Comment on Zuck's true form 1 week ago:
I think this recording really captures his character very well.
- Comment on Zuck's true form 1 week ago:
What AI? I recorded it myself!
- Comment on Zuck's true form 1 week ago:
Then get some salt. ;)
- Comment on Zuck's true form 1 week ago:
My favourite part is the sound. :)
- Comment on Low effort BMW slander 1 week ago:
Thanks, I stole it myself.
- Submitted 1 week ago to [deleted] | 15 comments