Prehistoric sex toys are kind of hard to look at

Comments

• TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  a classic
  Image

  source

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Looking at those all day is enough to break anyone.

    source
• JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  F in the chat for all the improvised fleshlights that did not survive the march of time. Not even an ancient cum sock.

  source

  • anomnom@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Probably made out of squishy animal bits instead of the bones.

    source

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      still practiced to this day in wales

      source
• Worx@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  “Prehistoric sex toys are kind of hard to look at - I keep getting thrown out of the museum after trying to get hands on experience with them”

  source
• NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Well if they were soft to look at, they wouldn’t be much use would they?

  source
• Zugyuk@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I love it when adverts get placed next to dildos 🤣

  Image

  source

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Wtf is up with humanity’s primordial fascination with cut dicks?

    source

    • WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      “Totally retracred or cut” means either the foreskin is cut or that it’s just pulled back.

      We don’t know if it’s cut or not, we can only speculate it looks like one.

      source
    • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It’s hard to cut body parts intricately.

      source
• TDCN@feddit.dk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Great… Now thats also part of my browser history

  source

  • Rin@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    i always use private for links. I think it’s a firefox setting on mobile

    source

    • somethingsomethingidk@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Damn I had no idea, you made my day

      source
• Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  hehe, hard

  source
• gwilikers@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  There are many non-dildoish uses for which it may have been intended but without doubt anyone at the time would have seen the penile similarities - Dr. Martin Rundkvist, archaeologist

  Brilliant.

  source
• wise_pancake@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  If you drew eyes on them, any of the lady image could become characters in a Ghibli movie.

  source
• Typhoonigator@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Why are they circumsized? Surely it would have been less work to leave the stone foreskin uncut.

  source

  • glilimith@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I suspect many of the uncut ones are less obvious and thus may have had their purpose misidentified. Also, it’s unclear if these are cut or merely retracted

    source
  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Because our ancestors didn’t get up their own ass about buzzwords.

    They got up their own ass about manhood rites instead.

    source

    • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      If the tools on display in the article are anything to go by, there is a distinct possibility they just got up their own ass.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Hestia@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Unfortunately flared bases weren’t invented until the 19th century.

  source
• Ludrol@szmer.info ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Cool blog post: …blogspot.com/…/bullshit-memes-8-ancient-egyptian…

  source