Schrödinger’s Cat isn’t dead OR alive. It’s dead AND alive. Schrödinger wanted to demonstrate with this thought experiment how bat shit crazy quantum physics are.
I like the determinism of Murphy’s Razor
Submitted 1 year ago by nifty@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/61c33b49-478b-4bb1-85df-df886ee8f148.webp
Comments
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 1 year ago
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
No, Occam’s Razor doesn’t say the simpler solution is the right one. It says that when two theories compete, the simpler one is preferred.
TheDoozer@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I had understood it to mean, the more simple a theory is, the more likely it is to be true.
E.g. “organisms change through time to become the creatures that exist today” vs. “organisms change through time to become the creatures that exist today through the intelligent design of a creator.”
The former, having fewer conditions to be true, is more likely to be true.
hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
That’s also not right. It’s about assumptions. The explanation that makes the fewest assumptions is usually the right one.
WarlockLawyer@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Murphy’s law is about bad things occurring. A cat gin a box of a good thing. Murphy’s Cat should really be about there not being a cat in the box.
ewigkaiwelo@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The cat could be dead ;c
jewbacca117@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I definitely have Occam’s Cat
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Total horror movie vibes
DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 1 year ago
Schrodinger’s and Murphy’s guns independently are good foundational principles for firearms safety.
uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
The XKCD is strong with this one.
son_named_bort@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Bingo!
officermike@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The meme creator absolutely butchered the vanilla version of Schrodinger’s cat. It’s not that the box contains either a live or dead cat and the observer is unaware of which it is, it’s that the cat in the box exists simultaneously in a state of being dead as well as being alive.
Rudee@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
So we can fix that row:
Wogi@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Those are much better, and arguably true.
Birch@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Schrödingers razor is just booze
hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Occam’s Razor is also wrong. It’s not about simplicity, but assumptions. The explanation that makes the fewest assumptions is usually the right one.