Rudee
@Rudee@lemmy.ml
- Comment on Pretty much every episode of ghost adventures 1 week ago:
You’d still have to use the appendix afterwards to sort through all the names
- Comment on What is the difference between pansexual, bisexual, and omnisexual? How do I know which one I am? 1 week ago:
I think queer is a catch-all for LGBT+ people in general
- Comment on Checkmate 1 week ago:
- Comment on Checkmate 1 week ago:
Pumba is not grossly misshapen! You shut your removed mouth !
- Comment on this "Number Go Up" Idle game is amazing 2 weeks ago:
Good job, fellow Linux ISO sharer 🫡
- Comment on Accessibility is important 2 weeks ago:
Calm down, sir. π≠3 is just a suggestion
- Comment on Behold mortals 2 weeks ago:
I find your lack of filth disturbing
- Comment on Creative and Inspiring building design 4 weeks ago:
No lacrimal caruncle. You can tell this was designed by a man smh
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
Literally just wear a belt at this point 🤷♂️
- Comment on A lengthy discussion was had 5 weeks ago:
What does sophistication mean in this context?
Is it to do with creating a more reasonable solution ?
Genuinely asking
- Comment on If there's a sort of "apocalyptic" event but there are still surviving communities, will people be able to make eyeglasses again, or are people with vision issues gonna be fucked? 5 weeks ago:
Pretty sure LASIK involves cutting open your cornea and affecting the aqueous fluid to correct the refraction. They don’t just shoot lasers into your eyes to make you see good
- Comment on 1 month ago:
For questions specific to a community, you may be better off going to said community !pathfinder2e@lemmy.world
- Comment on Mice 1 month ago:
Condescending much? I’m a veteran misogynist and even I had to look this up!
- Comment on Transformers, Rulebots in disguise 2 months ago:
Do you know what happens to a transformer when it gets sucked by lightning?
- Comment on Who dares disturb my liver? 2 months ago:
Are those the years when the term was used, or like, a score?
- Submitted 2 months ago to [deleted] | 25 comments
- Submitted 2 months ago to science_memes@mander.xyz | 2 comments
- Comment on Apparently his crew is big 3 months ago:
Novel ways of praising our Lord and Saviour✝️™️ incoming
- Comment on That's not how any of this works. 3 months ago:
- Comment on Metamorfuckthis 4 months ago:
Just imagine the diversity hire points for having a massive insect as an employee!
That’s a criminally underrepresented minority in today’s workforce
- Comment on When you see danger coming 4 months ago:
Oh no, my balls
- Comment on Draft her to the NFL right now 4 months ago:
The Visit 2: Hot pursuit
- Comment on fVck AI 4 months ago:
And fixing the use of POV! chef’s kiss
- Comment on Why do Americanized names of places etc exist? 5 months ago:
I think in this case, it’s the proper nouns that should be used. If we learned it as Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghèguò (or at least whichever part of that translates to “China”), it wouldn’t be too bad. There’s not much point in also using the Cantonese versions of “country”, “language”, etc., since most languages have their own analogue for these concepts
- Comment on Behold, the latest unnecessary AI innovation 5 months ago:
#AprilFoolsDay
They had us in the first half, not gonna lie
- Comment on Getting a bit crowded in there. 5 months ago:
Literal 5head
- Comment on Oh yeah, well now it's infinity google percent 5 months ago:
!lemmysilver
- Comment on What are people from Moscow and Versailles called? 5 months ago:
A demonym is a noun that specifically refers to a person from a particular location; you can’t use it as an adjective.
So in your second list, a school can’t be a Muscovite, since it isn’t a person. You could have met a Muscovite at the school in Moscow.
You would just say that you dated a Londoner. You would then use an adjective to describe the Londoner further (a female Londoner) or make the sentence longer and a bit clunkier IMO (a Londoner who was a woman)
- Comment on What if Apple / other brands sold desktop chips? 5 months ago:
The Exynos, M series, and Qualcomm chips are all ARM architecture, as opposed to the AMD and Intel CPUs, which are x86.
Because of this, the majority of software wouldn’t natively work on them. Apple has obviously developed versions of many programs that function on their laptops, and could extend the same treatment to the hypothetical desktop product. The other chip companies do not have this benefit, and would have to develop supported software from the ground up
- Comment on I only have a few so raise your hand if you want a Cheese Burger 5 months ago:
Oooh, me! (Me not pictured below)