aerodynamics

Comments

• ummthatguy@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Or a cow.

  Image

  source

  • TheBakedPotato@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Man. That looks like one happy cow enjoying that breeze. So serene. Very jealous.

    source

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Image

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• MossyFeathers@pawb.social ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Well… duh? A fairer comparison would be the cow vs jeep. A sea creature vs something designed for land isn’t that great of a comparison because water is thick enough that you’re going to need some kind of aerodynamic (fluodynamic?) adaptation to survive. Air is thin enough that evolution can sacrifice some aerodynamics for other traits.

  source

  • Cethin@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    At the speed cars move at, air behaves much like water. They’re both fluids. The faster you move the more resistance it has, but also the more dense the fluid is the more resistance it has. Moving quickly through the air is similar to moving slowly through water.

    source
  • Cypher@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I think it would be hydrodynamic and screw evolution I want my beef to be as aerodynamic as an F1.

    source
  • angrystego@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    So is a cow more aerodynamic than a Jeep?

    source

    • MossyFeathers@pawb.social ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Even though you already got your answer, yes. Yes they are lmao. All I was trying to say, however, was that it’s not exactly fair to compare “creatures” that exist in two different mediums.

      source
• jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m gonna need to put oversized tires, a jack, and a custom air intake on it for all my trips to Walmart.

  source

  • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    On the lobster?

    source

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Image

      source
    • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This guy gets it

      source
• _lilith@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Thats because its… www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-m&sca_es… HYDRODYNAMICALLY DESIGNED

  source
• propter_hog@hexbear.net ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  A Jeep is also less aerodynamic than a brick. Having a Jeep as a daily driver fucking sucks for gas mileage.

  source
• shiftymccool@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Lobsters go the other way though…

  source

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Hey - I ain’t judging nobody.

    source
• dmMeYourNudes@lemmynsfw.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  There’s a Jordan Peterson joke in here somewhere

  source
• Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Wouldn’t a lobster technically be waterodynamic? Or eaudynamic?

  source

  • raldone01@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Hydrodynamic

    source

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Ugh, of course! Thank you! So dumb of me. Hydrohomies and all. Appreciate it.

      source
  • grubberfly@mander.xyz ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    eauodynamic is so fun to pronounce.

    source
• Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Cyclist hate this not because of the danger it pose, but because it’s not aero.

  source
• jqubed@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  That looks like a TJ generation. I’ve also seen these with the JK (usually compared with a cow). I’d be curious to see the JL/JT, though, because they did a very clever job of rounding it off while making it look like it’s still flat.

  source