[deleted]

Comments

• FBJimmy@lemmus.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  1440p for the win!

  source

  • Bluefruit@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    1440p at 144hz is the ideal imo.

    source

    • stardust@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Even general desktop use is much more fluid like the mouse cursor, scrolling, and moving windows. I immediately notice if a monitor is running at 60 hz.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Coreidan@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I couldn’t give a single fuck about 4k

  source
• MarcomachtKuchen@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I don’t even have a 144 Hz screen

  source

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    60hz club represent

    source

    • Alpha71@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I’m running 3 40 inch TV’s as monitors.

      source
• tunetardis@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I find as I get older and my vision is not what it once was, I need bigger screens with good contrast but don’t care so much about resolution. I think it was on the show Corner Gas where they were talking about how big a screen you should get and concluded the size in inches should match your age. That made me laugh but I have to confess now there may be some truth in that…

  source

  • leisesprecher@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Wouldn’t that break the necks of everyone over 50?

    source
• Glide@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Screw 4k, but 120+ hz is amazing. I can barely stand playing things are 60fps anymore. I really notice it when game dips.

  source
• Keegen@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Refresh rate is king. I would much rather use a 1080p 120+Hz monitor over 4k 60Hz. 1440p 144Hz is the sweet spot though, big visual improvement over 1080p without the need to bankrupt yourself on a GPU powerful enough to drive a 4k 120Hz display or relying on upscaling making everything a blurry mess.

  source
• Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  My monitor is 4K 30 FPS the best of both world! XD

  source
• BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  That’s a strawmen

  The true issue is that a lot of games weigh ~150Gb and run a 45 fps on low at a resolution of 720~1080p

  source
• spicytuna62@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  My monitors are over a decade old and are still perfectly fine. I’ll upgrade to 1440p/144 Hz when I start seeing dead pixels or some other failure.

  They have DVI ports and all my stuff is too new for DVI so I’m on the adapter diet lol

  source
• bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I do have a 4k display. On my weakest machine.

  source
• corroded@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m a big fan of 4k/who gives a shit.

  source
• JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I just got a laptop with a 2160p screen and I honestly can’t really tell the difference.

  source
• ricdeh@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Nah 4K is wonderful. The higher the pixel density, the better the display (for me at least)

  source

  • Toribor@corndog.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    If you can run 4k at high frame rates then sure but the performance hit can be huge and a lot of displays can only do 4k at 30Hz anyway which isn’t worth it when 1440p is usually an option.

    source