How come it seems that there are little to no serial killers who are women in the modern age? Are they not caught or is it just the men that make the news?

Comments

• Greg@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Unfortunately in our society women don’t get enough opportunities. If we truly care about equality we should be supporting women who want to become serial killers, help them break through that glass ceiling.

  source

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Click here to donate to Girls in STEM (Serial Torture, Execution, Murder)

    source

    • DrownedRats@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Sorry to be pedantic but its actually STEAM now that Arson is considered hot girl shit.

      source
• Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  This is not just modern age, this is how it has been for as long as our knowledge reach back.

  Some say testosterone makes men more aggressive, but the problem is that the difference in aggressive behavior can be observed before sexual hormones kick in.

  Another possibility could be social structures.

  This article says there are 2 theories:
  www.ox.ac.uk/news/science-blog/roots-aggression

  One being male competition for reproduction, and the other social.

  Problem is IMO, that it doesn’t swing with behavioral studies of children, that to me seem to exclude both as the fundamental course for higher male aggression and tendency towards violence.
  Seems to me it goes deeper, yes we do have competition for reproduction, but so do women, and women can be quite competitive and aggressive about it too, but generally in a less violent way.

  A third possibility that may have a play, is that in a society where mankind consisted of minor nomadic groups, the men had a role of protecting the group, while women protected the children.
  This role for the male, needs the male to be less prone to fear of consequences of violence, giving the ability to confront danger, where women protecting the children were probably more prone to evade danger.

  So yes you could say it’s based on a social role, but that role is not learned, it’s a genetically encoded social role.
  Now there is a curiosity in that women have actually become MORE prone to violence for the past 50 years. And the above hypothesis does not explain that.

  As I see it, there must be new factors playing a role that did not exist previously. I suspect it’s an increase of hormone like chemicals in the environment.

  source

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Not refuting this at all, or claiming to be schooled on the topic, but also consider success rate. It could also be that women are less successful at physically destroying another human

    source

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Being that several statistics show higher rates of assaults in all women’s prisons then men’s, it would fit. Men are physically able to kill each other easier, but women do start physical altercations more than we like to admit.

      source
  • mononomi@feddit.nl ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    In your third option, why would the men protect the group and the woman protect the children?

    source

    • lath@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Pregnancy, giving birth, breastfeeding. The bonds formed during these times would mean mothers to be more likely to safeguard the child than assault an aggressor with reckless abandon.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • cynar@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Women were functionally disabled by having children, spending a significant amount of time either pregnant, or breastfeeding. This makes them the natural parent to focus on raising children. Also, in nature, losing 1 parent has a relatively minor drop in survival chances compared to losing 2.

      This ends up with men being more “disposable” than women. If 1 group needs to flee with the children, while the other holds off an attack, it’s most sensible for the men to defend. The women would provide a final line of defence.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s a thing that evolved among humans over millions of years. Men evolved bigger stronger muscles, because women are more vulnerable during pregnancy, and infants need their mother to survive.
      Making men more available for the more dangerous task of protection and hunting.
      So by the numbers, we evolved those roles, because it improved chances of survival for the group.
      Males are more aggressive, because it actually help the group to survive short term attacks and hunting for food, and women are cautious because that helps infants and the group survive long term.
      It all boils down to survival of our ancestors.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Eileen Wuornos:

    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aileen_Wuornos

    Even turned into a movie:

    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster_(2003_film)

    source

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yes obviously there are women serial killers too, I never claimed there isn’t, I just claimed women are less prone to violence, which is a damned hard statistical fact.

      source
• RobotToaster@mander.xyz ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Lucy Letby, Beverley Allitt, Heather Pressdee, Reta Mays, Kimberly Saenz.

  Female serial killers are more likely to be nurses, I guess.

  source

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That makes sense. Men are more likely to have the ability to overpower their victims, so nursing would give women a leg up in that regard.

    source

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Jeffrey Dahmer was so overwhelmingly strong and manly, I firmly believe a woman would not be physically able to do what he did. /s

      source
    • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Dr Harold Shipman, The Grindr Killer.

      source
  • Don_Dickle@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Are you watching to much ID tv?

    source
• madjo@feddit.nl ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  (semi-unserious answer) women listen to a lot of true crime podcasts, thus know what pitfalls caused other serial killers to be discovered and know how to avoid that.

  source
• radix@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Not a scientist by any means, but this article (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767421/) says men have a 3:1 difference in the rate of Antisocial Personality Disorder.

  Another: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920596/

  There is compelling evidence from behavioral genetic research that heritable influences are of importance in the development of antisocial behavior; approximately 50% of the total variance in antisocial behavior is explained by genetic influences. Yet, there is also evidence of a large environmental effect, both shared and non-shared environmental influences have been found to explain the remaining half of the variance.

  Obviously I don’t mean to suggest that everyone with ASPD is a serial killer, it presents in a number of ways, but it’s hard to imagine a serial killer without some sort of disregard for the value of life. This is probably one of many factors that tilt the scale toward violence being much more associated with men.

  source

  • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’d also say the very nature of physically overpowering a person, and/or subduing them to possibly move them to a more convenient location lends itself more to men. I dont think many women can physically overpower another person in a life and death struggle, my spitballed guess is that female serial killer personality types tend to use more indirect or subtle means.

    Angels of death come to mind as a more commonly female killer variety.

    source

    • takeheart@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This is true for serial killers in general though. Murders tend to be premeditated. If you are planning a murder you’ll look for ways to maximize your success and minimize the chance of getting caught. In modern times you don’t have to rely on pure strength; there’s a plethora of workarounds from drugs to guns. The actual desire to end a human life (usual enabled by some form of psychopathy) is the limiting factor. A serial killer personality type doesn’t throw the towel just because they are physically weak.

      source
• Fizz@lemmy.nz ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Women just don’t seem to gravitate towards the career path.

  source

  • BugleFingers@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That sounds like inequality! We should create programs to help introduce them into this male dominated field. /S

    source
• tilefan@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I frequently see the statistic that men commit something like 90% of homicides, but then you’ll notice that the clearance rate for homicide in this country is below 50%. makes you wonder

  source

  • mke_geek@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Maybe this means we need more female detectives.

    source
• southsamurai@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Well, truth is that nobody knows.

  There’s just not enough information available for anyone to have a reliable predictor of what will make someone become a serial. There are definitely the common things among serials, but they aren’t always present, and aren’t present in every serial. You know, the whole animal torture/killing thing, escalating lesser crimes, etc.

  So it’s impossible to know why more serials are men since we don’t even know why anyone goes serial in the first place. There’s not even definitive proof that the percentage of women serial killing represents all of them, or just the ones that got caught. For all we know, the numbers could be the same, and women are just better at getting away with it.

  So, there’s not really an answer to the question, though there are theories.

  The two theories I ran across that were the most convincing are that “triggering” whatever it is that makes people become serials is more likely to occur with men; and that there may be some linkage to the differences in hormones and brain development that go back to the womb. There’s also the idea that it’s both of those in conjunction, which seems more likely that it being only one of them.

  source

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    it’s impossible to know why more serials are men

    I disagree, it’s part of a pattern where men are generally more violent than women.

    For all we know, the numbers could be the same, and women are just better at getting away with it.

    No this is NOT a possibility, since serial killers are generally caught.

    source

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      No this is NOT a possibility, since serial killers are generally caught.

      As far as we know / hope. I bet a lot more get away with it than we’d think, though probably less than ever with modern tech / surveillance etc.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Oh hey it’s you again, time to block with my new account

  source

  • Deestan@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Nobody needed to know that

    source

    • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      At some point you’ll think “oh hey that was a good tip” if you have the capacity for reflection

      source
• aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Global regulatory efforts to eliminate heavy metal exposure may be part of it.

  source