Goddamnit.
Hmmm
Submitted 10 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/18af0def-7a26-4d4d-b032-9c1c533347fe.jpeg
Comments
KillerTofu@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Enkers@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
It took me up until reading your comment to get this one. “Is it that the scaling transformation only scaled the y-axis??”
radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I teach these basic transformations as part of my middle school math classes, and I was completely loss as to why they didn’t include a reflection, but then I realized a reflection wouldn’t be that interesting because it could be indistinguishable from a translation.
like@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Don’t use this. It’s not a lossless transformation!
SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Meanwhile, in SVG:
<g filter=“scale: 0.5”><xlink:use … /></g>
magnetosphere@fedia.io 10 months ago
Goddammit. This is like getting rickrolled.
ICastFist@programming.dev 10 months ago
We rarely get rickrolled anymore, such a loss
GlennMagusHarvey@mander.xyz 10 months ago
Goddamnit. This is like getting rick[rolling something involves flattening it]
The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 10 months ago
Is this science?
…seriously, I’m at a loss
justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
The second is not really scaled, and the second and forth have translation. Usually that wouldn’t be a problem for demonstrative proposed, if translation wouldn’t be shown explicitly. Can be fixed by introducing a canvas of the before/after picture
jol@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
The second is scaled in one axis, and had translation otherwise it would be hard to understand. And the rotation can be achieved by moving the origin of rotation.
dumbass@leminal.space 10 months ago
Ffs
maegul@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Ok … I didn’t know this meme (too old and/or out of the loop I suppose) … so out of annoyance I looked it up …
… and yea … as far as trolling is concerned gotta pay the game here … not sure it was worth 15 mins of my life but … kudos I guess
jaybone@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I don’t get it.
Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 10 months ago
Only the transformations one is correct. All the other ones seemingly also preform a translation, and even if they might be correct if you take the orgin to be slightly outside of the shape but that’s bad for educational purposes. Also this one makes the translation transformation look like the identity transformation.
This last one might just be me, but shouldn’t shearing be included here?
einlander@lemmy.world 10 months ago
No shear is disappointing.
half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Yeah, such a big loss it wasn’t included.
apocalypticat@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Scaling looks like scaling+translation? And rotation looks like either rotation+translation, or scaling+translation?
Soulfulginger@lemmy.world 10 months ago
That’s because it’s loss
apocalypticat@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Oooh🤦♂️
GlennMagusHarvey@mander.xyz 10 months ago
Um
The second wrong.
Or…only one
Dimension
funbreaker@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
I had to look at this twice to get it. I must be losing my touch.
propter_hog@hexbear.net 10 months ago
We like to do a little trolling
Freefall@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’m loss’d
h3mlocke@lemm.ee 10 months ago
L
halendos@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’m at a loss here.
Lemminary@lemmy.world 10 months ago
You sly dawg
ICastFist@programming.dev 10 months ago
Son of a bitch, stole my line