Comments

• halendos@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  I’m at a loss here.

  source

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    You sly dawg

    source
  • ICastFist@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Son of a bitch, stole my line

    source
• KillerTofu@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Goddamnit.

  source

  • Enkers@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    It took me up until reading your comment to get this one. “Is it that the scaling transformation only scaled the y-axis??”

    source

    • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      I teach these basic transformations as part of my middle school math classes, and I was completely loss as to why they didn’t include a reflection, but then I realized a reflection wouldn’t be that interesting because it could be indistinguishable from a translation.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• like@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Don’t use this. It’s not a lossless transformation!

  source

  • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Meanwhile, in SVG: <g filter=“scale: 0.5”><xlink:use … /></g>

    source
• magnetosphere@fedia.io ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Goddammit. This is like getting rickrolled.

  source

  • ICastFist@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    We rarely get rickrolled anymore, such a loss

    source
  • watersnipje@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    dQw4

    source

    • okr765@lemmy.okr765.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      w9Wg

      source
  • GlennMagusHarvey@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Goddamnit. This is like getting rick[rolling something involves flattening it]

    source
• The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Is this science?

  …seriously, I’m at a loss

  source
• justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  The second is not really scaled, and the second and forth have translation. Usually that wouldn’t be a problem for demonstrative proposed, if translation wouldn’t be shown explicitly. Can be fixed by introducing a canvas of the before/after picture

  source

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    The second is scaled in one axis, and had translation otherwise it would be hard to understand. And the rotation can be achieved by moving the origin of rotation.

    source
• dumbass@leminal.space ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Ffs

  source
• maegul@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Ok … I didn’t know this meme (too old and/or out of the loop I suppose) … so out of annoyance I looked it up …

  … and yea … as far as trolling is concerned gotta pay the game here … not sure it was worth 15 mins of my life but … kudos I guess

  source

  • davidgro@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Oh no, not The Game!

    source

    • maegul@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      😏

      source
• jaybone@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  I don’t get it.

  source

  • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Me too, I’m at a loss.

    source

    • jaybone@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      What is “loss” in this context?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Hjalamanger@feddit.nu ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Only the transformations one is correct. All the other ones seemingly also preform a translation, and even if they might be correct if you take the orgin to be slightly outside of the shape but that’s bad for educational purposes. Also this one makes the translation transformation look like the identity transformation.

    This last one might just be me, but shouldn’t shearing be included here?

    source

    • Maalus@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      You don’t get it either

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• einlander@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  No shear is disappointing.

  source

  • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Yeah, such a big loss it wasn’t included.

    source
• apocalypticat@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Scaling looks like scaling+translation? And rotation looks like either rotation+translation, or scaling+translation?

  source

  • Soulfulginger@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    That’s because it’s loss

    source

    • apocalypticat@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      Oooh🤦‍♂️

      source
• GlennMagusHarvey@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Um

  The second wrong.

  Or…only one

  Dimension

  source
• funbreaker@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  I had to look at this twice to get it. I must be losing my touch.

  source
• propter_hog@hexbear.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  We like to do a little trolling

  source
• Freefall@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  I’m loss’d

  source
• h3mlocke@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  L

  source