Goddamnit.
Hmmm
Submitted 1 year ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/18af0def-7a26-4d4d-b032-9c1c533347fe.jpeg
Comments
KillerTofu@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
It took me up until reading your comment to get this one. “Is it that the scaling transformation only scaled the y-axis??”
radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I teach these basic transformations as part of my middle school math classes, and I was completely loss as to why they didn’t include a reflection, but then I realized a reflection wouldn’t be that interesting because it could be indistinguishable from a translation.
like@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Don’t use this. It’s not a lossless transformation!
SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Meanwhile, in SVG:
<g filter=“scale: 0.5”><xlink:use … /></g>
magnetosphere@fedia.io 1 year ago
Goddammit. This is like getting rickrolled.
ICastFist@programming.dev 1 year ago
We rarely get rickrolled anymore, such a loss
GlennMagusHarvey@mander.xyz 1 year ago
Goddamnit. This is like getting rick[rolling something involves flattening it]
The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 1 year ago
Is this science?
…seriously, I’m at a loss
justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
The second is not really scaled, and the second and forth have translation. Usually that wouldn’t be a problem for demonstrative proposed, if translation wouldn’t be shown explicitly. Can be fixed by introducing a canvas of the before/after picture
jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
The second is scaled in one axis, and had translation otherwise it would be hard to understand. And the rotation can be achieved by moving the origin of rotation.
dumbass@leminal.space 1 year ago
Ffs
maegul@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
Ok … I didn’t know this meme (too old and/or out of the loop I suppose) … so out of annoyance I looked it up …
… and yea … as far as trolling is concerned gotta pay the game here … not sure it was worth 15 mins of my life but … kudos I guess
jaybone@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I don’t get it.
Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 1 year ago
Only the transformations one is correct. All the other ones seemingly also preform a translation, and even if they might be correct if you take the orgin to be slightly outside of the shape but that’s bad for educational purposes. Also this one makes the translation transformation look like the identity transformation.
This last one might just be me, but shouldn’t shearing be included here?
einlander@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No shear is disappointing.
half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah, such a big loss it wasn’t included.
apocalypticat@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Scaling looks like scaling+translation? And rotation looks like either rotation+translation, or scaling+translation?
Soulfulginger@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That’s because it’s loss
apocalypticat@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Oooh🤦♂️
GlennMagusHarvey@mander.xyz 1 year ago
Um
The second wrong.
Or…only one
Dimension
funbreaker@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
I had to look at this twice to get it. I must be losing my touch.
propter_hog@hexbear.net 1 year ago
We like to do a little trolling
Freefall@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m loss’d
h3mlocke@lemm.ee 1 year ago
L
halendos@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m at a loss here.
Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You sly dawg
ICastFist@programming.dev 1 year ago
Son of a bitch, stole my line