Also: Don’t be poor
Comment on Intruder
RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 month ago
How about don’t break into someone’s house?
lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
mrslt@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Lots of poor people don’t break into other people’s houses.
stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
and they remain poor
mrslt@lemmy.world 1 month ago
What exactly are you implying? That poor people must break into other people’s houses to escape poverty? Or that being poor just naturally gives one a predilection to break into the houses of others? Because the former is shitty, irresponsible advice that will get people maimed and/or killed, and the latter is insulting to the dignity of the less fortunate.
FMT99@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Agreed, you break the law you forfeit your life.
RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So you are down with someone breaking into your home and taking whatever they want including sexual liberties?
You are a better Christian than me.
FMT99@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yeah that’s exactly what I said. Well done.
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
And ruin every American gun owner’s wet dream?
chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’m a gun owner, and I have absolutely no interest in shooting someone ever.
You know how people who say people should eat less meat get a lot of flack because of those annoying vegans who spray-paint leather jackets?
That’s most gun owners. Perfectly reasonable people who have no interest in violence, take gun safety seriously, and store their guns safely.
The thing is part of responsible gun ownership is not wearing a shirt that says “fuck you, I have a gun.” We don’t make guns our entire personality, and we understanding that advertising our gun ownership will make people think we’re like the redneck jackasses you see on TV AND make it more likely to have our cars and homes broken into.
The number one way to get your car windows smashed and everything in it cleaned out is to put a Glock sticker on the window.
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Nah, sorry mate. I’d say your stats are wrong. I think the majority of gun owners in US are hateful idiots that would love to shoot someone - preferably a Mexican. There’s no great way to prove this, but it would be foolish to give Americans any benefit of the doubt that leans toward responsibility when stupidity clearly prevails. You might not be a shithead, and perhaps all gun owners are not, but I think the majority of gun owners are. Your Vegan analogy will hold water when the Vegans overwhelming vote for a convicted criminal nitwit platforming on hate and vengeance.
pimento64@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
“Source: my ass”
chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 month ago
There are around 400 million civilian-owned guns in the US. That’s almost half the entire world’s civilian-owned firearms. The US doesn’t have anywhere close to half the world’s homicides.
With the recent uptick in gun gomocide rates, we reached nearly 20,000 in 2022. That’s obviously very high. But if if we had 20 years straight of those horrifying death numbers, the odds of any specific gun being used in a homicide would still be less than 1/1000.
We have a violence issue in the US, no question, but if 0.01% of guns were used in homicide annually, the murder rate would be doubled. The fact is that the vast, vast majority of gun owners aren’t what you say they are.
GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No offense. Who cares. If someone is an asshole enough to break into someone’s house then they better be ready.
BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 month ago
Do you really think breaking and entering deserves a death sentence? I’m not condoning it by any means, but equally death seems like a disproportionate response, not to mention the long term effects this is bound to have on the child.
lemonmelon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
On the absolute surface level, you make what seems to be a good point. I don’t think that point holds up to scrutiny, though, and such lazy (no offense meant by this; I’m not calling you lazy, only the point you’ve made) reasoning is not far removed from using “think of the chldren!” to justify an agenda.
Any dwelling that is not yours is generally assumed to be off-limits absent an invitation to enter. Ignoring that and breaking into said dwelling is implicitly a statement that you are disregarding the safety and security of the inhabitants. That further implies that you equally have no regard for the health and well-being of the inhabitants, as your actions are putting your needs or desires ahead of theirs. You have, wittingly or not, made yourself a threat to the inhabitants of the dwelling.
Responding to an immediate, credible threat against one’s life with lethal force is quite rational.
I have no doubt that this will have detrimental long-term effects on the boy. I also have no doubt that the very experience of being present during a home invasion would have had similar long-term effects.
veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I don’t have the facts of the case, but it’s not like the defenders have the luxury of knowing the intruders intentions and how they will behave, but considering they are already doing something severely illegal, it’s not much of a stretch to think the intruder would be willing to put their life at risk, and in that context, it is absolutely justifiable to kill in defense.
lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 month ago
The state shouldn’t be executing people for it but a regular person defending themselves is a different scenario. Police (allegedly) are trained in safely restraining criminals and taking them into custody. A regular citizen defending themselves is not. The safest thing for them is whatever takes their attacker down the quickest. Unfortunately that is generally going to be lethal force.
Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yes
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Unless it’s a cop. Then you should have known better and the state can do with you as it pleases while we clap.
GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Fuck that. Break in my house and watch what happens. It’s not up for grabs. People that steal from other people are pieces of garbage. Steal from corporations.