Unebomber had some valid complaints
Comment on The unAbomber. Otherwise, I agree.
markz@suppo.fi 3 weeks ago
Haven’t read unobomber’s manifesto and probably never will because fuck anyone who seeks attention this way.
Saapas@piefed.zip 3 weeks ago
Comrade_Spood@quokk.au 3 weeks ago
That have been made by much better people who weren’t also eco-fascists.
W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Yes, but few people talk about them.
Comrade_Spood@quokk.au 3 weeks ago
Thats the problem. So maybe rather than giving the eco-fascist more coverage, we should highlight people who deserve it
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Eco terrorist, actually.
Saapas@piefed.zip 3 weeks ago
Unebombers actions were bad indeed.
MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I don’t approve of his methods, either.
Then again, I don’t approve of the Church’s methods, but there’s some pretty good stuff buried in the Christian bible, too.
Reading something doesn’t mean you need to agree with the author. It’s not like people are financially supporting the Unibomber, or excusing his actions, when they read his manifesto. They’re just studying history.
markz@suppo.fi 3 weeks ago
The comment was half just an excuse to mispell the name after OP set it up like that.
But from what I’ve heard, I’m not missing much of value, so I’d be reading poorly thought out ramblings of a murderer.
MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
“We give up a piece of ourselves whenever we adjust to conform to society’s standards. That, and we’re too plugged in. We’re letting technology take over our lives, willingly.”
Absolute insanity.
markz@suppo.fi 3 weeks ago
Well I didn’t need Ted to figure that out. How does the rest hold up?
Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 3 weeks ago
UNObomber? Is that the Mexican knockoff version?
human@slrpnk.net 3 weeks ago
markz@suppo.fi 3 weeks ago
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
i will use that term whenever someone hits me with a few +4 in a game
everett@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Onionbomber always brings a tear to the eye.
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Dead people can’t do much with attention
sidebro@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Yeah, damn that unåbomber guy
breadsmasher@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
unobomber was crazy but have you seen the duobomber?
markz@suppo.fi 3 weeks ago
Not dos?
starchylemming@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
people also talk about it as if everyone knows what its about
haven’t seen a tldr so far
queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Damn you’re so brave for condemning the unybomber.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Given the 2:1 ratio on that comment it seems like it might actually is a contentious opinion. Maybe the backlash is all due to it being interpreted as virtue signaling, but… there’s so many comments in here unironically praising Ted for his ideas and refraining from commenting on his later actions (or actively justifying them as ex: a way to be taken seriously).
queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
I think the contentious part is you acting sanctimonious about it. I know it rubbed me the wrong way, hence, my sarcasm.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’m not sure it’s unwarranted to explicitly condemn the unabomber here, though. People are unironically praising him in these comments - if condemnation was as obvious as you implied you would have much stronger grounds on which to call me sanctimonious, but right now there’s plenty of people arguing how the effectiveness of what he did distributing in distributing his message and nobody that’s yet pointed out that he was a literal terrorist.