I just tested. “Angelina jolie heat” gives me tons of shit results, I have to scroll all the way down and then click on “show more results” in order to get the filmography.
“Is angelina jolie in heat” gives me this bluesky post as the first answer and the wikipedia and IMDb filmographies as 2nd and 3rd answer.
So, I dunno, seems like you’re wrong.
ByteJunk@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Because that’s the normal way in which humans communicate.
But for Google more specifically, that sort of keyword prompts is how you searched stuff in the '00s… Nowadays the search prompt actually understands natural language, and even has features like “people also ask” that are related to this.
All in all, do whatever works for you, it’s just that asking questions isn’t bad.
stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 hours ago
Google is not a human so why would you communicate with it as if it were a human? unlike chatgpt it’s not designed to answer questions, it’s designed to search for words on webpages
queermunist@lemmy.ml 19 hours ago
I spend most of my time communicating with humans so I’m generally better at that then communicating with algorithms.
stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 hours ago
what’s there to learn about using search terms
i_am_hiding@aussie.zone 18 hours ago
Tell me you’re too young to have used “Ask Jeeves” without telling me
stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 hours ago
I’m a zillenial 🤓
Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 16 hours ago
Except Google has been optimizing for natural language questions for the last decade or so. Try it sometime, it’s really wild
stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 hours ago
typing keywords instead of full sentences is still quicker so nah
ByteJunk@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Because we’re human, and that’s a human-made tool. It’s made to fit us and our needs, not the other way around. And in case you’ve missed the last decade, it actually does it rather well.