Redex68
@Redex68@lemmy.world
- Comment on They have a right to feel smug 1 day ago:
Some do, have one that does it, was useful once because I locked myself out of the house and was able to reach in and open that door from the outside.
- Comment on They have a right to feel smug 1 day ago:
What do you mean by the mechanism is the other way around?
- Comment on They have a right to feel smug 1 day ago:
Same, this is the default in Croatia
- Comment on Fear not, and enjoy this mere interlude to its fullest! 1 week ago:
Sure, I get the biology and technical aspect of it and I can understand that something could evolve whose atoms would move in such a way that it results in an object that is capable of responding dynamically to its roundings, plan and think. But for that collection of atoms to then result in this experience, I feel is extraordinarily exceptional.
- Comment on Fear not, and enjoy this mere interlude to its fullest! 1 week ago:
The weirdest thing to me is that it’s literally impossible to measure and detect whether something has consciousness. Every other thing in our universe can be measured theoretically, even if not by our current tools, but there is no way to confirm that someone else is experiencing what I am experiencing currently. It’s just so weird.
- Comment on Fear not, and enjoy this mere interlude to its fullest! 1 week ago:
I don’t believe in God nor am I religious, but consciousness just feels so fucking weird man. Everything in the world can be explained through science and physics, cause and effect, hell even our brains and actions are just a chain of atoms interacting. But consciousness just feels so out of place. Why am I? Why am I even aware of my own existence? Why has a set of atoms resulted in my non-material consciousness? It feels so out of place. Why isn’t it just a bunch of atoms bumping into eachother, why am I capable of feeling and thinking?
- Comment on Anon hires a goth chick 5 weeks ago:
Same. But sex would also be great
- Comment on LPT: Go get a shot, now. 5 weeks ago:
There’s more people in the US
?? How is that relevant
- Comment on Evolution: 🖕 1 month ago:
Damn, this is totally gonna be a thing, and I’m all for it. We shall all become cute cat girls.
- Comment on 💀 💀 💀 1 month ago:
Holy fuck I did not know they were so hot, how does a human body even survive that for any amount of time.
- Comment on Resources 2 months ago:
I’m basically living as a hermit but I guess we just have different needs.
- Comment on Resources 2 months ago:
How do you need more than 90m² when living alone?? I live in a 60m² apartment and literally only use like 30-40m² and idk what I’d use the rest for.
- Comment on wolf spiders 2 months ago:
My condolences
- Comment on Jigsaw Trolley Problem 3 months ago:
I’m think it’s implied that you can only take pull out one ball at random from behind a door.
- Comment on Jigsaw Trolley Problem 3 months ago:
I think the ball is at C3.
Albert knows that Bernard doesn’t know where it is exactly, that means the ball can’t be in the first two rows, because if it was that would mean there’s a chance for the ball to be in column 5 or 6, in which case Bernard would known right away where it is exactly (as those columns have only one ball). This means the ball must be in row C or D and column 1, 2, 3 or 4. We know Bernard was able to deduce the exact position of the ball from this information, which means it can’t be column 1 (as there are 2 balls still remaining there). That means it must be in column 2, 3 or 4. We know Albert was able to deduce the exact position if the ball from this, and since row D has 2 balls still in play (collumn 2 and 4), meaning Albert wouldn’t be able to guess which one it was, that means it’s in row C, as row C has only one ball left in play.
Now idk what the correct choice would be statistically. If I remember correctly, the Monty Hall problem states that there’s 2/3 of a chance you’ll get it correctly if you switch doors, but since a gold ball was pulled out from behind the first door (the ball at C3 is gold), I think that means there’s a 2/3 chance of the first door (the one from which the ball was pulled out of) being the one with all gold balls (since it contains 2/3 of all gold balls). In that case I think the probabilities cancel out? Which means it doesn’t increase your chances whether you switch or not.
- Comment on Anon turns on raytracing 3 months ago:
There aren’t many but the new Indiana Jones and Doom games require ray tracing
- Comment on Melon-chicken-Aspic 3 months ago:
Please unalive yourself in Minecraft
- Comment on Try it today! 3 months ago:
Lol. Lmao even.
- Comment on Peak male form 3 months ago:
#4 With that dazzle camouflage, ready for naval engagements
- Comment on Has Slavic engineering gone too far? 3 months ago:
Same thought, but I’m 50/50 on whether it’s an AI generated image or a shitty picture sharpened with AI.
- Comment on Anon considers LASIK 3 months ago:
How do they keep your eyes from looking away or blinking while they’re doing it if it’s whilst you’re awake?
- Comment on Material scientist wet dream 4 months ago:
Water Zero
- Comment on Farming beans be like 4 months ago:
No, kutomjer.
- Comment on memes from my biology class #6 4 months ago:
- Comment on Anyone? 4 months ago:
Please cease existing.
- Comment on Could wastewater plant simply heat up water past 500C to decompose all chemicals and output clean water? 5 months ago:
Ok yeah the second part makes sense, but for the first part I was calculating it based on hand washing, dishwashers would be way less since you have to split the usage per person in the household, which holds for hand washing as well. Idk for other people but when I’m alone I use the dishwasher probably every 3-4th day and for handwashing I’d say 20L is realistic, double it maybe but still isn’t that much.
- Comment on Could wastewater plant simply heat up water past 500C to decompose all chemicals and output clean water? 5 months ago:
Yeah but it says “at home” and gives recommendations how you personally can reduce water consumption (like more efficient taps or showerheads), which makes me believe that it’s not your entire direct and indirect water consumption (which realistically isn’t even relevant for the argument since the water used for crops isn’t gonna be getting treated anyway)
- Comment on Could wastewater plant simply heat up water past 500C to decompose all chemicals and output clean water? 5 months ago:
How the hell do people use that much water? Are they including water consumption needed for the products we use or? Let’s say a flush is 8L and the average person flushes 5 times a day, that’s 40L. The average person needs about 2L of water a day. Let’s say an average shower is 100L. Cleaning dishes at worst is probably like 20L per person without a dishwasher. That’s like 160L of water per day and I feel like most of those were over-estimates. How did they get to that number?
- Comment on Choose a number, 1-5! 5 months ago:
2 but thicker and a bit different handle.
- Comment on I'm a 6'1" man with size 3 feet which means every they measure my feet at a shoe store, the Brannock device gatekeeps my gender 5 months ago:
I mean, your feet typically don’t really change size after you grow up? I just buy whatever size I last bought.
