Redex68
@Redex68@lemmy.world
- Comment on Jigsaw Trolley Problem 1 week ago:
I’m think it’s implied that you can only take pull out one ball at random from behind a door.
- Comment on Jigsaw Trolley Problem 1 week ago:
I think the ball is at C3.
Albert knows that Bernard doesn’t know where it is exactly, that means the ball can’t be in the first two rows, because if it was that would mean there’s a chance for the ball to be in column 5 or 6, in which case Bernard would known right away where it is exactly (as those columns have only one ball). This means the ball must be in row C or D and column 1, 2, 3 or 4. We know Bernard was able to deduce the exact position of the ball from this information, which means it can’t be column 1 (as there are 2 balls still remaining there). That means it must be in column 2, 3 or 4. We know Albert was able to deduce the exact position if the ball from this, and since row D has 2 balls still in play (collumn 2 and 4), meaning Albert wouldn’t be able to guess which one it was, that means it’s in row C, as row C has only one ball left in play.
Now idk what the correct choice would be statistically. If I remember correctly, the Monty Hall problem states that there’s 2/3 of a chance you’ll get it correctly if you switch doors, but since a gold ball was pulled out from behind the first door (the ball at C3 is gold), I think that means there’s a 2/3 chance of the first door (the one from which the ball was pulled out of) being the one with all gold balls (since it contains 2/3 of all gold balls). In that case I think the probabilities cancel out? Which means it doesn’t increase your chances whether you switch or not.
- Comment on Anon turns on raytracing 1 week ago:
There aren’t many but the new Indiana Jones and Doom games require ray tracing
- Comment on Melon-chicken-Aspic 1 week ago:
Please unalive yourself in Minecraft
- Comment on Try it today! 1 week ago:
Lol. Lmao even.
- Comment on Peak male form 3 weeks ago:
#4 With that dazzle camouflage, ready for naval engagements
- Comment on Has Slavic engineering gone too far? 3 weeks ago:
Same thought, but I’m 50/50 on whether it’s an AI generated image or a shitty picture sharpened with AI.
- Comment on Anon considers LASIK 4 weeks ago:
How do they keep your eyes from looking away or blinking while they’re doing it if it’s whilst you’re awake?
- Comment on Material scientist wet dream 4 weeks ago:
Water Zero
- Comment on Farming beans be like 1 month ago:
No, kutomjer.
- Comment on memes from my biology class #6 1 month ago:
- Comment on Anyone? 1 month ago:
Please cease existing.
- Comment on Could wastewater plant simply heat up water past 500C to decompose all chemicals and output clean water? 1 month ago:
Ok yeah the second part makes sense, but for the first part I was calculating it based on hand washing, dishwashers would be way less since you have to split the usage per person in the household, which holds for hand washing as well. Idk for other people but when I’m alone I use the dishwasher probably every 3-4th day and for handwashing I’d say 20L is realistic, double it maybe but still isn’t that much.
- Comment on Could wastewater plant simply heat up water past 500C to decompose all chemicals and output clean water? 1 month ago:
Yeah but it says “at home” and gives recommendations how you personally can reduce water consumption (like more efficient taps or showerheads), which makes me believe that it’s not your entire direct and indirect water consumption (which realistically isn’t even relevant for the argument since the water used for crops isn’t gonna be getting treated anyway)
- Comment on Could wastewater plant simply heat up water past 500C to decompose all chemicals and output clean water? 1 month ago:
How the hell do people use that much water? Are they including water consumption needed for the products we use or? Let’s say a flush is 8L and the average person flushes 5 times a day, that’s 40L. The average person needs about 2L of water a day. Let’s say an average shower is 100L. Cleaning dishes at worst is probably like 20L per person without a dishwasher. That’s like 160L of water per day and I feel like most of those were over-estimates. How did they get to that number?
- Comment on Choose a number, 1-5! 2 months ago:
2 but thicker and a bit different handle.
- Comment on I'm a 6'1" man with size 3 feet which means every they measure my feet at a shoe store, the Brannock device gatekeeps my gender 2 months ago:
I mean, your feet typically don’t really change size after you grow up? I just buy whatever size I last bought.
- Comment on logs are for quitters 2 months ago:
Whilst I get your point, their point is still valid in the sense that you just can’t extract that energy from gasoline in a more efficient manner than just burning it. For practical purposes, gasoline truly is that much less energy dense.
- Comment on We are so cooked 2 months ago:
I’m not too up to date with this story, but haven’t pesticides been used for forever now? Why would the suddenly cause a 80% drop in population?
- Comment on Today's Survey. One point for everything that you have NEVER DONE 2 months ago:
13
- Comment on 3's grip looks the most comfy 3 months ago:
Definitely 5, so much better than 99% of other pens.
- Comment on Depart, men of education. 3 months ago:
Most probably money
- Comment on You're* 3 months ago:
Isn’t it the opposite? I’ve never seen a footnote with the number/star at the end of the footnote.
- Comment on Marc Rober shows why Tesla's camera-only self-driving system is dangerous 3 months ago:
The main problem in my mind with purely vision based FSD is that it just isn’t as smart as a real human. A real human can reason about what they see, detect inconsistencies that are too abstract for current ML algorithms to see, and act appropriately in never before seen circumstances. A real human wouldn’t drive full speed through very low visibility areas. They can use context to reason about a situation. Current ML algorithms can’t do any of that, they can’t reason. As such they are inherently incapable of using the same sensors (cameras/eyes) to the same effect. Lidar is extremely useful because it helps get a bit better of a picture that cameras can’t reliably provide. I’m still not sure that even with lidar you can make a fully safe FSD car, but it definitely will help.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
Got my first today
- Comment on Murica 4 months ago:
You do need to take into account however that biking might reduce the need for other form of exercise which would counteract the increased emissions. But either way I’d bet that per km biking is vastly more efficient, as in orders of magnitude more efficient.
- Comment on Doordash deserves it's fate 4 months ago:
I mean, it shouldn’t be that expensive. Where I live basically every pizza and fast food place used to offer free delivery. Nowadays because of delivery services this has died out a bit, but it still exits, yet ordering through the delivery services is way more expensive.
I honestly don’t even get it, because for a long time the delivery services were operating at a loss, not even sure if most of them are in the plus even now, yet they should be more efficient than every fast food place having its own drivers.
- Comment on Select a tip 4 months ago:
This would get an immediate Custom -> 0% from me the moment I see it.
Fucking “soso” for a 20% tip the hell
- Comment on 𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓴𝔂 DuckDuckGo survey 5 months ago:
I think it’s actually Bing or Google, used to be just Bing. But the searches are anonymised and not tied to user profiles (as well as the ads), so I like it more since I’m at least not giving Google all of my data.
- Comment on Why do so many UK electrical sockets have an on/off switch next to them? 5 months ago:
I too am relatively envious of the UK’s outlet design, I only hate how bulky and foot destroying they are.
