Scan to Verify You're Human

Comments

• Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml ⁨8⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

  Doesn’t clicking on the headphones switch to an audio test like with regular captcha? That’s what I do and it works first time instead of getting an endless number of images when I use VPN. The words you enter don’t even have to be 100% correct.

  source
• DrunkAnRoot@sh.itjust.works ⁨42⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

  I tried watching some yt in librewolf made me do 5 captchas an i had to switch vpn location so fuck google

  source

  • W3dd1e@lemmy.zip ⁨22⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

    I have degoogled but YT is the only thing I’m stuck with. The monopoly is too much to overcome.

    source
• laundry861@fedinsfw.app ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  None of these are about identifying if you’re human, they’re about identifying which human you are.

  source
• EisFrei@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Not to excuse Google’s practices, but you can select the eye icon to continue training an AI to detect buses and bikes.

  source

  • sidebro@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Oh, thanks for letting me know. I missed that one, as it isn’t all that clear that’s what it does.

    source
• gressen@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Name the offending website please.

  source

  • lemmyng@piefed.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Google. It’s their recaptcha service doing that. The QR code validation also gets rejected if you’re using a privacy oriented mobile OS like Graphene.

    source

    • markz@suppo.fi ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      At the cost of conditioning people into following orders from random qr codes

      source
    • dieTasse@feddit.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      you mean it was google.com? Or on which website was this recaptcha?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • wander1236@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    It looks like a Cloudflare interstitial. I also don’t think sites get to choose which challenge types show up in reCAPTCHA, so this is on Google.

    source

    • fizzle@quokk.au ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Isn’t the site choosing to use recaptcha?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • sidebro@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    archive.is in this case

    source
• psx_crab@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Man i will nope out if this website so quick.

  source
• Maxxie@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I dont understand how and why is the phone involved in this check. I assume its a link to a website that authenticates you (probably google), but why not open it in the browser its alread at? Like what recaptcha was already doing for the past decade?

  Im so confused

  source

  • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world ⁨59⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

    A few years ago I was given a technical deep dive into Akamai’s bot detection systems. One area they were quite focused on were bots impersonating mobile devices, and in particular mobile apps. It’s commonplace for attackers to try to mimic the behavior of mobile apps because it often provides more direct access to the data they’re looking for than trying to scrape websites.

    To counter this threat Akamai developed a library for their customers to incorporate into their apps. This library collects a bunch of haptic data from the mobile device, such as the tilt sensors, accelerometers, finger taps/swipes on the screen, and other available data. It then encrypts it and sends it along to Akamai along with the data the app sends. Akamai then analyzes that haptic data and uses it as part of their bot detection analysis.

    It is VERY difficult for a computer to mimic the truly random way a mobile device moves in space, or the way your fingers tap/swipe on a screen. If you were asked to draw a straight line from the upper left corner to the bottom right corner of your smartphone, not only would it not be perfectly straight but it would be quite fluid in its randomness. Writing a computer program to simulate that would be very tough. You’re far more likely to get lots of short straight lines with jagged angles than something that looks like a human drew it. And computer algorithms can quickly analyze this sort of data and return a confidence score indicating if it appears to have been created artificially or not.

    So my guess is that when that QR code is scanned it will launch a Google app that will collect some similar haptic data and send it off to Google along with a unique id for that captcha. Google will then quickly analyze that haptic data to determine if you’re a bot or not.

    source

    • Maxxie@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨41⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

      Ohh, I’ve never thought about phone authentication being superior due the amount of sensors it has. Thanks for explaining, it makes a lot of sense (and I hate it)

      source
  • ambitiousslab@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I think they can use remote attestation on the mobile device to prove that it’s a physical device. They do that through Google Play Services or whatever the equivalent is on iOS. So, for instance, scanning the QR code on a custom ROM like lineage or GrapheneOS doesn’t work.

    source

    • snooggums@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

      They want to force interaction with your phone so they can identify who you are.

      source
• 45o3b@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I’ll get hate for referencing a solution that involves AI, but this looks promising: github.com/Captcha-Sonic/CaptchaSonic-Extension

  source

  • lemmyman@lemmy.world ⁨58⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

    Lmao so the captchas don’t even do anything anyway. Except harass us.

    source
  • AssaultPepper@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    This is a good use of AI.

    source

    • muhyb@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Eye for an eye

      source
• MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Recaptcha users will experience some visitor losses.

  source
• Hubi@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Not justifying this by any means but you can just click on the eye icon at the bottom to get the regular captcha.

  source

  • snooggums@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

    Vague option is vague.

    source
• MrSoup@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I see phishing opportunity here

  source
• Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Scan to get hacked

  source
• NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  … what?

  source