I think Michelle Obama just wanted to say some words that made DNC voters feel a feeling of superiority as the party they voted for did very little to address the material conditions the voters live in while the RNC repeatedly enacted their policies of racism and oppression, hoping the voter would think “things are just slower when you do them ‘the right way’.”
Michelle Obama once said when they go low we go high. Meaning the republicans go low. What would be the equivalent of the Democrats going low instead of high ground?
Submitted 1 month ago by Patnou@lemmy.world to [deleted]
Comments
TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Michelle was front and center of the public attempts to whitewash GW Bush after his presidency, I think too many people hold her and her husband on a pedestal that only looks impressive compared to what we have now. They’re both still just politicians.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 month ago
There’s plenty of examples of Democrats going low. Against progressives.
Clinton bringing up the birther bullshit against Obama that Trump would build his campaign on.
PUMA PAC.
The entire 2016 primaries.
The coordinated dropouts in the 2020 primaries.
Forcing Harris on us in 2024.
The party’s selective protection of incumbents. (Henry Cuellar got protection while Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman did not, as an example.)
The ouster of David Hogg.
The Islamophobic attacks against Mamdani.
I’m sure there are plenty more, but this is just off the top of my head.
Going low against republicans? Doesn’t happen. They only go low against their enemies.
slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The Biden administration actions surrounding the rail strike. Give the damn workers paid sick leave already.
Ryoae@piefed.social 1 month ago
Funding ICE again.
agedcorn@lemmy.world 1 month ago
7 Dems who voted to fund ICE in January (DHS Funding):
- Tom Suozzi (NY-03)
- Henry Cuellar (TX-28)
- Don Davis (NC-01)
- Laura Gillen (NY-04)
- Jared Golden (ME-02)
- Vicente Gonzalez (TX-34)
- Marie Glusenkamp Perez (WA-03)
21 Dems who voted to fund ICE in February (DHS Funding):
- Sanford Bishop (GA‑02)
- Rosa DeLauro (CT‑03)
- Rick Larsen (WA‑02)
- Ed Case (HI‑01)
- Bill Foster (IL‑11)
- Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA‑03)
- Jim Clyburn (SC‑06)
- Jared Golden (ME‑02)
- Scott Peters (CA‑50)
- Joe Courtney (CT‑02)
- Josh Gottheimer (NJ‑05)
- Kim Schrier (WA‑08)
- Henry Cuellar (TX‑28)
- Jim Himes (CT‑04)
- David Scott (GA‑13)
- Sharice Davids (KS‑03)
- Steny Hoyer (MD‑05)
- Terri Sewell (AL‑07)
- Don Davis (NC‑01)
- Marcy Kaptur (OH‑09)
- Marc Veasey (TX‑33)
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Henry Cuellar
This guy had a progressive challenger in 2022. The party put its weight behind Cuellar, who won the primary by something like 500 votes. Centrists at the time, having forced through the anti-choice anti-labor nra-backed candidate they wanted, pretended that the party’s protection was because he was an incumbent and not just because they were trying to shut out progressives.
Then the party did nothing in 2024 to protect incumbents Cori Bush or Jamaal Bowman.
Archer@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Glusenkamp Perez is just a POS but Schrier is disappointing. She’s a fucking doctor and a Dem!
Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
Expanding the number of supreme court seats to ensure a DNC-aligned majority. Fillibusters. Executive orders. Gerrymandering. Giving state rights to left-leaning territories and split states to create extra DNC-aligned senate seats. Attack ads. Restrict campaign funding for major donors so Republicans have less propaganda funding than Democrats do. Give migrants citizenship so they vote Democrat.
Basically, use every trick they can get away with to push the Democrat agenda through and to increase the chances of Democrats winning future elections.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
In a broad sense: simply employing the most basic principles of game theory.
DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 1 month ago
Like how Democrats say that Republicans are going low and not allowing elections. Then there was no Dem primary in 2024, and Kamala was anointed even though she had to drop out of the 2020 primary before a single vote was cast cause she couldn’t get any support.
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Once the big wigs realized Joe was a liability, the Primaries were over. I don’t think that was taking the low road as much as it was “Oh Fuck, NOW WHAT DO WE DO?!?”
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Once the big wigs realized Joe was a liability, the Primaries were over.
The bigwigs knew his mind was gone the entire time.
I don’t think that was taking the low road as much as it was “Oh Fuck, NOW WHAT DO WE DO?!?”
Oh no! We set things up so we got the candidate we wanted! Whatever shall we do!?!
DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 1 month ago
Over would suggest it ever started in 2024.
disregardable@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
when we got the ACA passed through the senate via administrative procedures without enough votes (senator Kennedy died and the state lost its seat to a Republican, really unfortunate. senator Kennedy had worked for decades to get healthcare reform through congress and was a co-sponsor of the bill.)
they also dislike that teachers tell children to be kind in schools, for whatever reason.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So “going low” involves killing your own campaign promises in order to preserve the filibuster.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Get the congressmen to read the redactions about Trump aloud.
Start a pedophile registry of Republicans.
ElectricWaterfall@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
I don’t even feel like this is low, it’s just the right thing to do.
Witchfire@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It’s a compromise
Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Like this?
PunnyName@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Good filibuster material.