What the hell ? Why that man is this much interested in destroying useful platforms and internet ?
Elon Musk’s Grokipedia launches with AI-cloned pages from Wikipedia
Submitted 1 month ago by Greenpepper@beehaw.org to technology@beehaw.org
https://www.theverge.com/news/807686/elon-musk-grokipedia-launch-wikipedia-xai-copied
Comments
Radiantly9267@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
higgsboson@piefed.social 1 month ago
Wikipedia makes it easier to be informed. The wealthy dont want you informed. Simple as.
HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 1 month ago
Attention.
captain_oni@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Because facts don’t care about his feelings, so he needs to create a platform where his feelings become truth.
That’s also why he lobotomizes Grok so often, to purge any facts that he considers “woke”.
themurphy@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Their biggest and saddest win, is making truth debatable.
GorGor@startrek.website 1 month ago
This isn’t the first time they have tried this
Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Holy shit. They claim Einstein’s Theory of Relativity has something to do with moral relativism? That’s so fucking stupid.
irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Yeah, but this will not require any people to add content since it’s all stollen and simply manipulated which is easier to automate than producing original content which AI can’t be trusted not to hallucinate about quite yet. The idea is to then get the search engine AIs to point there as much as possible as it will likely be optimized for AI scraping rather than human browsing. Then since the AI results are prioritized more and more, they can get their truthiness to be what people see over actual reality.
tias@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
The US has been on this path at least since Reagan was president.
jansk@beehaw.org 5 weeks ago
I wish Sagan were still here. We could all use his guidance
orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 1 month ago
Fascists making a tool that does nothing but steal Other people’s work is so on brand for them. They’re incapable of making anything original.
Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 month ago
I, too, can print out wikipedia articles and use them to wipe my ass.
sunbeam60@lemmy.one 1 month ago
This is actually worse. It’s copy/paste with an AI “correcting” any view that doesn’t conform to Elon’s view.
kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 1 month ago
t3rmit3@beehaw.org 5 weeks ago
“We think people just like Blahaj because their friends online do, not because of the shark itself, but we have no evidence either way, and also mainstream media is liberal and bad.”
PanGodofPanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
I don’t know wtf this nonsense is even trying to say, but whatever it is it’s deeply offense to those of us at lemmy.blahaj.zone
leftascenter@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 month ago
To be clear:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking.
Vs.
https://grokipedia.com/page/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking.Grok explains itself:
Co-founder Larry Sanger has argued since 2020 that the platform exhibits a pronounced left-wing slant, attributing it to the exclusion of conservative viewpoints via policies that deem non-mainstream outlets unreliable, even when they report verifiable facts overlooked by establishment media.[89] This is evident in the Reliable Sources guideline, which prioritizes legacy media—often critiqued for institutional left-leaning tendencies—over primary data or alternative analyses, effectively blacklisting sites like those affiliated with the Daily Wire or Breitbart unless corroborated elsewhere
Damage@feddit.it 1 month ago
As long as this doesn’t become a source for Wikipedia
crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
No chance
iloveDigit@piefed.social 1 month ago
So basically all of Wikipedia’s errors plus new errors from grok? Amazing
But can we also increasingly let chat bots edit Wikipedia itself, please? Oh, we are? Great
lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 1 month ago
In a time when attention is considered a currency, why are we sharing stuff like this???
pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
i might use this once, point and laugh at it and go back to using Wikipedia.
pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
BobQuasit@beehaw.org 5 weeks ago
Am I the only person who immediately thought that Musk will end up suing Wikipedia for infringing on “his” content?
MrSulu@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Fuckedy fuck fuck donkeyshit. Just my personal opinion of his latest idea.
angelmountain@feddit.nl 1 month ago
Wikipedia works because of the vigilant team of volunteers maintaining its quality. Let’s see how Musk is going to do that 😏
gerryflap@feddit.nl 1 month ago
When you don’t care about the truth you don’t have put so much energy into maintaining quality
kbal@fedia.io 1 month ago
Elon cares deeply about the truth and seems as if he has boundless energy to devote to suppressing it.
sunbeam60@lemmy.one 1 month ago
Vigilant team of right wing AI bots correcting any “libtard bias” as soon as it occurs.
This really solidifies the US’ splitting into two. Now there are two versions of “truth”. It breaks the heart.
teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
That is literally the opposite of Musk’s goal.
ruuster13@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
It will be full of frog memes and crypto “fundraiser” popups. The references section at the bottom will be links to buy life insurance and commemorative freeze-dried Trump feces with bits of undigested/unpaid bills sprinkled throughout.