Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Elon Musk’s Grokipedia launches with AI-cloned pages from Wikipedia

⁨87⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Greenpepper@beehaw.org⁩ to ⁨technology@beehaw.org⁩

https://www.theverge.com/news/807686/elon-musk-grokipedia-launch-wikipedia-xai-copied

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • angelmountain@feddit.nl ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Wikipedia works because of the vigilant team of volunteers maintaining its quality. Let’s see how Musk is going to do that 😏

    source
    • gerryflap@feddit.nl ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      When you don’t care about the truth you don’t have put so much energy into maintaining quality

      source
      • kbal@fedia.io ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Elon cares deeply about the truth and seems as if he has boundless energy to devote to suppressing it.

        source
    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      That is literally the opposite of Musk’s goal.

      source
    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Vigilant team of right wing AI bots correcting any “libtard bias” as soon as it occurs.

      This really solidifies the US’ splitting into two. Now there are two versions of “truth”. It breaks the heart.

      source
    • ruuster13@lemmy.zip ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      It will be full of frog memes and crypto “fundraiser” popups. The references section at the bottom will be links to buy life insurance and commemorative freeze-dried Trump feces with bits of undigested/unpaid bills sprinkled throughout.

      source
  • themurphy@lemmy.ml ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Their biggest and saddest win, is making truth debatable.

    source
    • GorGor@startrek.website ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      This isn’t the first time they have tried this

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia

      source
      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Holy shit. They claim Einstein’s Theory of Relativity has something to do with moral relativism? That’s so fucking stupid.

        source
      • irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Yeah, but this will not require any people to add content since it’s all stollen and simply manipulated which is easier to automate than producing original content which AI can’t be trusted not to hallucinate about quite yet. The idea is to then get the search engine AIs to point there as much as possible as it will likely be optimized for AI scraping rather than human browsing. Then since the AI results are prioritized more and more, they can get their truthiness to be what people see over actual reality.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      The US has been on this path at least since Reagan was president.

      goodreads.com/…/632474-i-have-a-foreboding-of-an-…

      source
  • Radiantly9267@lemmy.ca ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    What the hell ? Why that man is this much interested in destroying useful platforms and internet ?

    source
    • higgsboson@piefed.social ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Wikipedia makes it easier to be informed. The wealthy dont want you informed. Simple as.

      source
    • HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Attention.

      source
    • captain_oni@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Because facts don’t care about his feelings, so he needs to create a platform where his feelings become truth.

      That’s also why he lobotomizes Grok so often, to purge any facts that he considers “woke”.

      source
  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Fascists making a tool that does nothing but steal Other people’s work is so on brand for them. They’re incapable of making anything original.

    source
  • kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Image

    what

    source
  • Kolanaki@pawb.social ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I, too, can print out wikipedia articles and use them to wipe my ass.

    source
    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      This is actually worse. It’s copy/paste with an AI “correcting” any view that doesn’t conform to Elon’s view.

      source
  • leftascenter@tarte.nuage-libre.fr ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    To be clear:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking.
    Vs.
    https://grokipedia.com/page/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking.

    Grok explains itself:

    Co-founder Larry Sanger has argued since 2020 that the platform exhibits a pronounced left-wing slant, attributing it to the exclusion of conservative viewpoints via policies that deem non-mainstream outlets unreliable, even when they report verifiable facts overlooked by establishment media.[89] This is evident in the Reliable Sources guideline, which prioritizes legacy media—often critiqued for institutional left-leaning tendencies—over primary data or alternative analyses, effectively blacklisting sites like those affiliated with the Daily Wire or Breitbart unless corroborated elsewhere

    source
  • Damage@feddit.it ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    As long as this doesn’t become a source for Wikipedia

    source
    • crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      No chance

      source
  • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    In a time when attention is considered a currency, why are we sharing stuff like this???

    source
  • iloveDigit@piefed.social ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    So basically all of Wikipedia’s errors plus new errors from grok? Amazing

    But can we also increasingly let chat bots edit Wikipedia itself, please? Oh, we are? Great

    source
  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Fuckedy fuck fuck donkeyshit. Just my personal opinion of his latest idea.

    source