Inspirational

Comments

• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  If you need your arrows to land all at the same time so you can fool the enemy into thinking you are many archers fire like this.

  Image

  source

  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    bottom projectile traveling at mach 5

    source

    • Tja@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Bottom projectile is traveling at a normal speed, just fired last.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • niktemadur@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I wanna see a reverse brachistochrone!

    source
• tyler@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Did nobody else notice that they’re pointing the bow lower than 45° but the line is drawn slightly upwards up compensate?

  source

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    If you keep falling short, cheat. Or if you keep falling short, your rich parents will prop you up.

    So inspiring.

    source
  • OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Also, the arrow has some serious gliding effect on its way down.

    source
• zxqwas@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  In a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.

  source

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Yeah you actually want a bit less then that.

    source

    • Ooops@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Unless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim ever higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.

      source
• SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  The optimal launch angle would only be 45 in a vacuum. It’ll be lower if you’re on Earth where there’s air resistance.

  source

  • ulterno@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Yeah, that’s why try multiple times and aim higher every time until 45°
    Once you reach that, if you are still falling short, you know you have no chance, unless you increase the launch speed.

    Of course, you can try to properly calculate drag for each projectile and set that as the maximum, but it’s fine for a one-off.

    source
• snoons@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  CAN WE GET MUCH HIGHER?!?

  source

  • ininewcrow@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Unless you can achieve a certain amount of force … then you can get a stable orbit around the planet

    source

    • CannonFodder@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Not unless you have something to alter the trajectory in flight.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • RedBauble@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    CAN WE GET MUCH LIGHTER

    source
• innermeerkat@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Instructions unclear and took an arrow to the knee

  source

  • Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    It’s supposed to end up in the butt.

    source
• niktemadur@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  And if you still can’t reach it, ask your god or gods for help,
  as it’s beyond the reach of Mr Newton or even Herr Leibniz.

  source