CIA propaganda down the drain

Comments

• toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Swapping CIA propaganda with CCP propaganda, I see. Temu does use slave labor for some products, or rather, they dont check whether the seller does and dont care when it happens. Just because that persons factory doesnt is not proof.

  source

  • erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    They clearly state they don’t use child labour, because the little cunts are too inefficient apparently. (Multiple reports show that children are specifically used in Chinese factories, including assembly lines for Apple and Samsung, because their small hand are better at assembling components.)

    source

    • Venator@lemmy.nz ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      They’d probably be more efficient in terms of calories burned to do the same job… It wouldn’t really matter if they’re slower if they’re not getting paid anyway…

      source
  • MyRobotShitsBolts@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    your point is still way valid.

    source
• Tyr_Raidho_Othala@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I wonder what happens if I mention 天安门广场 in the comment section or the independent Republic of China or Uyghur treatment.

  source

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    You get banned from the app. People have already done that and posted results.

    source

    • Tyr_Raidho_Othala@reddthat.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      For real? Then I believe these people from OPs screenshot really are paid government clowns.

      source
  • EddyBot@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    ☂️

    source
• BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  no,So many goods cannot be produced by children, it is inefficient

  Lol, love the focus on productivity, knows how to read the room.

  source

  • psx_crab@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Because they know corpos can exploit adult better than kids lmao

    source
• mEEGal@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Image

  source
• tomalley8342@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Do I trust Sexy cockroach, +_+, et. al, or do I trust wikipedia?

  source

  • donuts@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Doesn’t the wiki say the same thing, that it’s considered a myth? English page instead of chinese: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System

    source

    • Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      “There has been a widespread misconception that China operates a nationwide and unitary social credit “score” based on individuals’ behavior, leading to punishments if the score is too low. Media reports in the West have sometimes exaggerated or inaccurately described this concept. In 2019, the central government voiced dissatisfaction with pilot cities experimenting with social credit scores. It issued guidelines clarifying that citizens could not be punished for having low scores, and that punishments should only be limited to legally defined crimes and civil infractions. As a result, pilot cities either discontinued their point-based systems or restricted them to voluntary participation with no major consequences for having low scores. According to a February 2022 report by the Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), a social credit “score” is a myth as there is “no score that dictates citizen’s place in society”.”

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Kolanaki@yiffit.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      It says one source considers it a myth, but specifically points to a lack of an actual score, and then goes on to show how the metrics are actually kept and what they are for. So it sounds like the “myth” is that they don’t actually have a single numerical score for a citizen, but they do have extreme restrictions on their freedom based on what they do with their money and shit.

      source
    • RandomVideos@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      As someone who has used both romanian and english versions of wikipedia, i can say that language versions are radically different

      The english version of a page could have thousands of words, while the romanian version be only one sentence long

      source
• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Why do people believe random people online though, what makes you think they aren’t lying

  source

  • glitch1985@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I’m the smartest person in the world and agree with you completely.

    source

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Finally some validation

      source
• hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Obviously American propaganda is bad, but how do you know this is not Chinese propaganda?

  source
• CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  +1000 Social Credit

  source
• AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  And how do you know this is not pro-china propaganda? They do have social credit just not in the way you think. And before a fucking tankie responds with “uhh the us is worse”, indont fucking care, thats why i dont libe in the us. Instead in the us they have credit scores and criminal history checks before a job interview. Huge empires were always shit and will always be. The whole tactic of tankies is that they try to convince you that they are better than the us, not that they are actually good.

  source

  • holo@lemmy.wtf ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    No, they don’t. They literally have no such system.

    source
• socsa@piefed.social ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It's always amazing to me seeing the "everything you read is propaganda" mfs insist that nothing they read is propaganda.

  source
• RandomVideos@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Of course its imoossible to do, you are wasting bytes with such high numbers

  A char would be much more efficient at storing the data and would only require about 1.4 Gb to store all the numbers

  source
• DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  “Social credit isn’t real” Australia: Hold My Bear

  source