Is no one going to comment on the “magnified five times under a microscope”? Five times? What kind of weak, low refraction plastic lens, cost of bubblegum microscope are you using to magnify your enormous monster ants?
THANK YOU
Submitted 5 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/83913079-fc84-400b-969f-7c3d910e5667.png
Comments
gjoel@programming.dev 5 months ago
Nikelui@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Considering the size of an ant and the picture, I’d say at least 50x
davidgro@lemmy.world 5 months ago
What is this, a magnification for ants?
GiveMemes@jlai.lu 5 months ago
400x is more than enough to see and differentiate eukaryotic cells so I feel like 50x might be a slight overshot
agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
At first I thought 5 orders of magnitude, but 10,000x is way off. The closest I can reckon is they mean “magnified 100% five times”, i.e. 2⁵, or 32x, which seems like it could be right.
DrDystopia@lemy.lol 5 months ago
Browsing on a 32" monitor, “I wonder how they handle cat-sized ants where ever that’s from”.
scytale@lemm.ee 5 months ago
It’s “less” frightening when you realize those red things aren’t the eyes, like the other pictures in the comments that show them better
angrystego@lemmy.world 5 months ago
This picture has no right to say it shows a face when it omits the eyes and jaws. It’s like posting a picture of human nose and saying what an ugly face people have.
luciole@beehaw.org 5 months ago
This picture is kind of misleading though. Much of the photo’s creepiness comes from mistakenly assimilating the red dots to its eyes. Ants have those big familiar insect eyes we are familiar with. Quote from Snopes:
This is a closeup of a section of the ant’s face but not the full face. In a text message, Kavaliauskas [the photographer] told us, “This is just the front part of the portrait […] the eyes are already in the shadow area. […] if the eyes are illuminated, all the mystery disappears and the photograph appears ordinary and uninteresting.”
stupidcasey@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Given a single bulldog ant can kill a full grown adult and we are several orders of magnitude larger than them and there are 20 quadrillion of them each able to lift 50 times their own weight yeah, I would say it’s a good thing we are bigger than them.
Nothing to do with the picture of this ants antennas though.
AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 5 months ago
I hadn’t heard about bulldog ants before and was incredulous about your statement, but damn, yeah, bulldog ants are wild
rockerface@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Elden Ring ants support this
M137@lemmy.world 5 months ago
It looks like Josef Fritzl…
Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 5 months ago
Thanking nature because of the ant face and not how it will gank up on you, inject you with paralysing venom, and tear you apart?
jlow@beehaw.org 5 months ago
And it’s not like a giant ant would not be still terrifying:
ekZepp@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Dude…
Image
Ants are cute.
Image
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Gotta admit the way the meme crops the rest the face out makes it look metal as hell. That’s a great monster design.
SuzyQ@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
I agree. My first thought was “that’s a great hell hound.”
moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
this ant still looks scary to me
the last two are friend shaped
Taleya@aussie.zone 5 months ago
Looks more like a jim henson creation than scary
driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 months ago
Extremely cute:
Image
Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 5 months ago
Agreed but that fourth picture has to be AI slop
casmael@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Yup well spotted that one looks like it’s almost certainly ai generated now that you mention it