I decided to wait for Valve standalone. Even if it never comes out I’d rather keep waiting than get a meta headset.
Meta wants to be the Microsoft of headsets
Submitted 7 months ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to games@lemmy.world
https://www.theverge.com/2024/4/22/24137284/meta-license-horizon-os-quest-headset-lenovo-asus
Comments
stardust@lemmy.ca 7 months ago
RaoulDook@lemmy.world 7 months ago
The Valve Index is here already and great. No bullshit like the Quest, just VR that works well. If you have a gaming PC with at least a quad-core and RTX 3060 then you should be good to get started with one. Mine works fine on a 9-year old gaming PC with 6 cores, 16GB RAM, and an RTX 3060TI. The motherboard is that old, the rest of the parts are newer (mostly GPU)
vikingtons@lemmy.world 7 months ago
They’re thinking of something that can work unteathered to a PC, like the rumoured valve deckard system
davidgro@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I think by standalone they mean ‘no PC’. Like the Quest ones that run the games on themselves.
echodot@feddit.uk 7 months ago
They would have to strive to be less shit than Microsoft.
Right now meta have a proprietary display technology. They need in some way to transition that to a standard, and they’ve done absolutely nothing in that area to move towards that goal. They have absolutely no idea how to move VR into the mainstream. Everything they do is all about making more money in the short term but they have no long-term strategy.
Where is the equivalent of HTML? Where is their standard for producing VR and AR content? They need to display the content, they don’t need to own it.
They want to create “The Metaverse” and yet they don’t get that in order to do that it needs to be open source and public access. Now they are trying to create a closed source VR internet, and it won’t work.
BertramDitore@lemmy.world 7 months ago
For someone as apparently intelligent as Mark, it’s amazing how stupid he is.
It doesn’t matter what you do or say, Mark, I will never buy something produced by or associated with Meta. Don’t care how groundbreaking or revolutionary it might be.
I see you, Mark. I’ve watched how you operate for the last 20 years, Mark. I’ll never give you a cent.
RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I hate facebook but i love vr. And it was the only one i could afford. I have it completely blocked off the internet though since i only use it for steamvr. 🥺
BertramDitore@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I feel you, and part of the reason we don’t have access to cheaper and better options is because of Meta’s monopolistic instinct. They bought oculus, which had been actively innovating, instead of competing with them and strengthening the market by developing their own product. It’s not like they didn’t have the money.
I don’t fault anyone for buying their stuff if it’s cool, my stand is purely a stubborn one at this point. I just won’t touch Meta with a ten foot pole.
Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 7 months ago
a lot of people dont have the same hate for mark that you have, and a lot of people dont even know that meta is facebook. He’s not a good person, but he’s not stupid
Daxtron2@startrek.website 7 months ago
You can be extremely intelligent and still fucking dumb as rocks. Intelligence in one area doesn’t necessarily equate to intelligence in other areas.
echodot@feddit.uk 7 months ago
He’s not a good person, but he’s not stupid
Citation needed on that one.
He’s done a mind-numbly large amount of brainless things. That money is in selling VR headsets and yet they haven’t done anything to make VR content interesting to the general populace.
JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Every time I read about Meta I pray a little more that those rumors about Valve working on a standalone VR headset are true
antihumanitarian@lemmy.world 7 months ago
This must be pandering to shareholders, no company in their right mind would want to compete when Meta is selling their first party headset at a giant loss.
umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 months ago
ill be very dissapointed if they succeed.
i hope they keep failing at it.
elliot_crane@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Why the fuck would anyone want to be the Microsoft of anything?
Voytrekk@lemmy.world 7 months ago
💲 💲 💲
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 7 months ago
So they wanna discontinue dealing in VR, just like Microsoft did? 🤔
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 7 months ago
It’s not the hardware side of the Quest I take issue with, zucc
superfes@lemmy.world 7 months ago
That’s cool, I didn’t buy Microsoft products either.
Cornpop@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Will always be a niche product. The general population has no interest in strapping a display to their face.
echodot@feddit.uk 7 months ago
It could be a lot more but we don’t have anyone in a position of authority within these companies with any kind of long-term vision.
All they have to do is look at sci-fi and basically make that but they’re too obsessed about their walled gardens
emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 7 months ago
It’s that fucking readyplayerone movie. They all saw that and thought “what if everyone was obsessed with a virtual world, and there was only one virtual world that was basically a monopoly, and what if we controlled it all” without realizing how dumb that is and that competing, and likely better software will definitely end up being created organically by people who care about the end result more than they do about money.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 months ago
Honestly “Microsoft” would have been a perfect brand name for a line of VR gear, if they hadn’t jumped the gun and applied it to software back in the day.
garretble@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Sorry, Mark, so long as Meta is attached to the headset I’m not going to buy it.
I don’t even let Meta website into my house. I have all that blocked at the DNS level.
Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com 7 months ago
Exactly, I’d buy a headset from Temu before Id buy something from Meta
Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I wish I could do that at our house. My wife would lose her shit though along with we need it for events sadly. The one thing FB is good for is groups and events.