How about their shit and the rest of their garbage? Or raise the tax/fine for not doing so to better fund efforts to clean up the mountain. First option is probably better because then no one has to risk their life cleaning up after other people.
I get that it’s a crazy achievement to summit the highest point above sea level, a point dozens, if not hundreds have died to reach, but it shouldn’t come at the cost of the environment.
Drusas@kbin.social 8 months ago
It has always blown my mind that they leave all their shit and garbage up there. Any and all responsible hikers, backpackers, and mountain climbers have a "pack it in, pack it out" policy. It's the norm. Yeah, packing shit sucks, but you love nature, so you deal with it.
Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’d wager that the love of nature is not something a fair amount of Everest climbers give two shits about, or at the very least it’s nowhere near the “photo op” that’s at the top of their list of priorities.
PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 8 months ago
Tbh, keeping your rubbish on you probably isn’t on the forefront of your mind while you’re slowly suffocating up there.
It’s not really comparable to taking a walk over your local national park
Drusas@kbin.social 8 months ago
Oh, I get that. But if it's not something you're willing and able to deal with, then you shouldn't be going up there to begin with.
Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Eh, imo if you decide to risk your life unnecessarily climbing a mountain, plan to take your garbage out because you shouldn’t be let back down without it. Freeze up there with the garbage.