Actually, no, it looks stupid and is stupid. Hands carry all sorts of dirty bacteria. Those watches won’t last. Maybe that’s what they want though.
Comment on Innovation
QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
honestly looking into it this looks sick as hell
altphoto@lemmy.today 1 month ago
starchylemming@lemmy.world 1 month ago
bold of you to assume that someone who gers this has sex
Nasan@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
that’s why they keep the watch on during. unscrupulous sex worker might try to scam an extra hour out of them.
backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 1 month ago
It’s just goth aesthetics for nerds. And somehow doing it with a smart watch makes black metal gauntlets look less silly.
end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 1 month ago
👁️ 👁️
GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Looks kinda neat, but also has big LOOK AT ME vibes. Not to mention the issues the other commenter mentioned regarding wear and hygiene.
I could see it being useful for larger devices a user has to interact with constantly to free up and reduce strain on the hand though.
rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
It’s the “driver” orientation and there are even watches made with “12 at 2” to implement it.
It was for race car drivers back at the turn of the last century. It just makes you look like a dork now.
restingOface@quokk.au 1 month ago
Wearing a watch at all makes you look like a dork anyway
rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I’m old, I’m allowed to wear my Timex.
Botzo@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Ironman indiglo? Still miss that watch, and I haven’t worn one for 15 years.
restingOface@quokk.au 1 month ago
You’re allowed to look like a dork. No one’s stopping you.
hOrni@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Looks uncomfortable. I wouldn’t want to wear a glove all the time.
dingus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I do think it looks pretty cool…but what about washing your hands? That’s the main issue with it I’d think.
dan69@lemmy.world 1 month ago
At this point just extend it down to ur wrist and call it a carpal tunnel wrist watch.
RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 1 month ago
While I’m not a fan of the leather implementation, I have to both agree that it’s a placement improvement in terms of ergonomics, and it does look pretty cool. I think it might wear out faster, being exposed to the gripping area of your palm, though. I’d expect it to be difficult to wash your hands or handle dirty/sharp items.
SGforce@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
I would immediately smash it on a door frame
LORDSMEGMA@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I got a Garmin for that reason. Couldn’t tell you how many times I’ve whacked it on stuff.
HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Same
naeap@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Can confirm
Don’t know what they build their watches with, but they seem to absolutely not care, when I smash them at concrete or steel
Which is good, because it’s my first watch again after like 20 years without one, and I needed quite some time to adapt - and still forget about it and demolish other stuff with it by accident
AnAverageSnoot@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
I wear mine while woodworking and I have dropped all kinds of tools on it with no issues
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This has to be trolling. Like, no, it’s not, unless you prioritize the watch and functionally nothing else in your day-to-day life. (This is even just accounting for ergonomics, e.g. assuming this is achiral and can be transferred easily to the right hand – not how conspicuously stupid it looks.)
Glancing to look at your watch is not that onerous even when done relatively frequently. Literally what could your day-to-day life possibly be that this is more ergonomical?
ol_capt_joe@piefed.ee 1 month ago
If you’ve ever had to wear a thumb stabilizer you know it’s really uncomfortable to have something wrapped around your thumb all day. (Enjoy those blisters in the webbing between thumb and index!)
And you have to remove it to wash your hands?
Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
If she has one too, they can kith
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This doesn’t seem like a daily use but specialized for running/hiking. It’s like criticizing hiking boots for being uncomfortable and hard to lace compared to sneakers.
RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You have me laughing over here.
It’s more ergonomic for the reason that it’s an easier, more natural viewing angle that puts less strain or stress on the body to view/use it. You don’t necessarily have to agree with that, or yuck someone else’s yum. Most of your issues are preference.
Did you miss the part where I said I wasn’t a fan of the leather implementation? Because that would rule out most of those points.
Have an upvote for the effort, though!
lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 month ago
I think it would screw with the mobility of your thumb. That thing would be shifting all around if you used your hand.
jumponboard@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I dont like it simply because it’s always visible. At the wirst, I can choose when (not) to look at it.