Parts of it were, but parts were hand drawn, all of the text was put in manually with the comic neue font, and the whole thing was assembled piece by piece in gimp.
Comment on If this seems exaggerated to you then you haven't worked in IT long enough
moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
AI generated, look at that keyboard
bizarroland@lemmy.world 2 days ago
RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 day ago
If you know a post you publish on lemmy used AI in its making, i recommend disclosing that so people dont start complaining about the use of AI and downvoting the post
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Like that would stop them.
lmuel@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
What part is hand drawn? Seems a little scummy to use AI and then put your watermark in the corner of the art you stole…
Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
They did make the comic. They might not’ve made the images, but they are the ones that came up with the idea and put it together. It’s an expression from their mind, and therefore them watermarking it is a nonissue.
It does just seem scummy, it is scummy to gatekeep art.
AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Whats scummy is discouraging people from sharing their artistic expressions because your inferiority complex from them using a tool. Art has always been copied and built from other people. How many drawing books teach you to trace existing art to learn? How about photo realistic drawings which are traces from photos? How many works are derivatives from public domain? Yet that all gets to be art…The scumy thing in AI is that corporations use them for profit and aim to remove labor so they can increase their wealth hoarding, not that people can use them to express themselves without needing years of training…
gmtom@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Again people loudly not understanding how AI works.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I’m guessing the text wasn’t AI 🙄
SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Why does AI use this beige background color?
samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Maybe it’s trained on scans of old newspaper comics.
AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Oh no, someone used a tool to express something…this anti people making art with AI is so damn tiring.
Jankatarch@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Oh fuck that. Everyone here would be more than fine with a stickman drawing. When was the last time you saw an IT guy be elitist with drawings.
This is not about expression, it’s about someone using models trained for $50000 cause 30 minute drawing too much.
Inefficiency is annoying for a reason.
AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works 18 hours ago
Art is a form of expression for people…it doesn’t matter how long it took what matters is that they wanted to share something with others that they thought of. This is their expression of that thought. The model isn’t going anywhere and allowing them to be more efficient in their expression by using a tool to it quicker doesn’t diminish that no matter what. You want to be mad at scummy companies for how they trained the models and them trying to remove labor from the mix so they can become massive monopolies all while fucking over the planet and increasing the wealth gap. Go right ahead that is completely valid, but shutting down other people’s forms of expression for using a tool is bullshit gatekeeping that does nothing constructive.