Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Can a U.S. president premptively pardon themself?

⁨70⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Endmaker@ani.social⁩ to ⁨[deleted]⁩

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • BooBees@fedinsfw.app ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Yes, but only for federal crimes, not state charges. It’s kind of a moot act for official acts, because the Supreme Court already stated presidents are immune to prosecution for official acts, so they’d have to pardon themselves for personal criminal acts. Most of those can be charged by a state or on a local level, non federal, so it would be risky. However, practically the US doesn’t have a great appetite for charging and prosecuting Presidents.

    source
    • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      That bud needed to be nipped at Nixon.

      source
    • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      To be an American President, is to be a criminal. Every last one of them.

      source
      • Necrifyre@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        William Henry Harrison

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Every human is a criminal. Every baby, a criminal. Even plants? You guessed it. Criminals.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        I could use some schooling this morning. What was Carter’s crime?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        What did John Quincy Adams do? I thought he was cool :(

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Establishment Dems: Well, OK. Just this once.

    source
    • Endmaker@ani.social ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Yuta from JJK

      source
  • radix@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    It’s an unanswered question, but the SCOTUS immunity ruling makes it mostly moot anyway. A President can’t be charged with crimes related to “official business.” Which specific acts count as official vs unofficial depends on the interpretation of a judge/justice, and probably gets extremely messy and inconsistent, which is why the ruling is considered problematic by most.

    They can NOT pardon to protect themselves from impeachment.

    source
    • warbond@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I would like to see this immunity tested thoroughly very soon

      source
    • dan1101@lemmy.world ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Hopefully it can be established that granting favors and adding to their personal wealth are not official business. Really is any criminal act official business, I think not.

      source
    • radix@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Not going to make a top level comment since this may be considered sort of a tangent, but there is chatter about lots of White House staff asking for pardons, since they aren’t necessarily immune. The thing is, once someone gets a pardon, and they no longer face prosecution, there is no danger of self-incrimination, and the 5th Amendment right to not speak largely disappears. I.e. they could be compelled to testify against Trump.

      So does Trump throw all these people under the bus by making them face criminal prosecution for his crimes, or does he make them immune and increase the risk (even if only reputational) to himself? Investigators could easily offer immunity in exchange for testimony even without a pardon. I think we know which he’ll choose, but it leaves both sides pitted against one another.

      The snake may be about to eat itself.

      source
  • HubertManne@piefed.social ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    100% sure they can try and one will.

    source
  • _stranger_@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I have a feeling this one’s gonna try

    source
  • ContactClosure@lemmus.org ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    You see, that’s the fun part about spending years ignoring the courts. Others can do the same! We could send him to CECOT. No due process? No problem!

    source
  • someguy3@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Hasn’t been tested but apparently most constitutional lawyers say yes.

    source
  • TipRing@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    We don’t know. Nobody has ever tried it before. Common law would suggest no, but really it’s anyone’s guess with the current make up of the supreme court.

    source
  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Don could pardon JD for all crimes on their last day in office. Then Trump resigns and JD becomes President and pardons Don.

    source
  • Obviouslywrong@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    For trump its more like how fast can they pardon themselves before they commit another felony, you can’t pardon yourself for the future.

    source
  • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    God damn it whenever I see a question like this it immediately is thought up by the GOP too

    source
  • yakko@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    They can certainly try

    source
  • disregardable@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I think it’d go 7-2 no. The midrange Republicans aren’t going to go for something so obviously unfounded in history that would just lead to lawlessness.

    source
  • Zachariah@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Not from a next presdient’s executive order.

    source