Yes we can. Hair is a mammal thing.
Radicality
Submitted 2 hours ago by Godric@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/1791b6c1-0131-4c96-beca-c39d33d358b8.jpeg
Comments
bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 1 hour ago
SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 1 hour ago
do we know that ONLY mammals had hair for the entirety of evolution? /genuine
bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 51 minutes ago
There is a hairy frog. But he’s something of a psycho aberration.
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 57 minutes ago
It’s highly probable if dinosaurs evolved to look like this they’d have trouble breeding and die out.
VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 38 minutes ago
All the males only listened to Tatesaur, and then all the females lost interest.
CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 59 minutes ago
But what if a group of dinosaurs independently evolved hair or something highly convergent to it, but then that lineage left no descendants among modern birds, leaving none of them with the trait?
bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 45 minutes ago
If we are going to make up stuff we can’t prove or disprove, at least go big. Like maybe some of them breathed fire.
bananasuit@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
That has to be Haalands ancestor
paranoid@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
It was recently proven that at least some dinosaurs had feathers after a piece of amber was found with a perfectly preserved dinosaur tail