I wouldn’t go for this. Even in Victorian times, the catapult was outdated technology.
Now, then, if it were a trebuchet, then you’d really see how far that baby could go.
Submitted 1 day ago by ickplant@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/e98f6d43-9162-4334-b61c-acaa5b082b7d.jpeg
I wouldn’t go for this. Even in Victorian times, the catapult was outdated technology.
Now, then, if it were a trebuchet, then you’d really see how far that baby could go.
If it were a trebuchet, you could put 30 average newborn babies in a sack and launch them 300 meters
Using a counterweight!
They where ahead of their time.
Its fake. The structural integrity seems too weak to handle that kind of tension. Maybe a few feet forward but 35 isn’t possible with that pathetic joints. Also not even a crank to pull it back in? Shit design, 2/10.
Yeetus foetus
I could easily just throw a baby over 35 feet.
DO IT!
Is this what that one guy used to drown that baby in lake michigan?
Is this still available?
hairsprings are so cool
Yeet cannontapult
probablymissing@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
“fully restored and finished” IT’S MISSING A PIECE!!!
Image
ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 13 hours ago
That’s for reloading.