I’m awaiting the fireworks for when they use AI to patch the Cobol systems still used by the banks.
CTO reveals new AI plan...
Submitted 2 days ago by xia@lemmy.sdf.org to [deleted]
https://lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/d8e93de6-b251-41f4-bd1f-1e5c7f7eff5f.png
Comments
Toes@ani.social 2 days ago
Arigion@feddit.org 2 days ago
A study found AI is slowing experienced developers down: reuters.com/…/ai-slows-down-some-experienced-soft…
Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Just keep writing on the same line ? Fixes everything
Zelaf@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
Exactly, just run your magical new code in a minifier and problem solved! It’ll be just as speedy as the real deal!
xia@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
Ok… just for you, I will extend the saying to be “every line and column is a liability”.
Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
It sounds like you’re suggesting single-letter variable/function/class names everywhere
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Bill Atkinson and his -2,000 lines of code would like a word
xia@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
Even then, so the theory goes… every line of code is a liability, it is only emergent properties of the system as a whole that makes it an asset. It takes but one line to destroy it’s value, and in general a 2kloc codebase is more valuable than a 4kloc codebase, if they do the same thing. QED? :)
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
Is it objectively more valuable?
I’d say if performance and functionality remain the same it improve and complexity is reduced then the 2kloc codebase is better
If it’s 2k lines of perl, it’s worse
Though in his case it sounds like he reduced complexity and improved performance, so definitely better.
I don’t know if I’ve even written -2000 lines at once, but I’ve definitely done -700 or so at least. Feels so good to delete a bunch of code without any loss in functionality.
cm0002@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
The plan to deal with the tech debt:
jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
There’s a ticket in the backlog. We’ll get to it next sprint (aka never).
AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
A recent job I had, Product kept saying this over 2ish years…
…at the end of the stint and with ~2 weeks until launch, they laid off all but one person on the team (some 12 engineers or so, myself included).
I often wonder how much shit that person is wading through leading up to launch and post-launch fighting fires.
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
Step 1: AI it all
Step 2: ?
Step 3: Profit!
etchinghillside@reddthat.com 2 days ago
The AI will detech the debt.
marcos@lemmy.world 2 days ago
It’s the only plan form all the teams that the company actually executes!