Why does Steam generate any revenue for PlayStation?
Steam now generates three times more revenue for Capcom than PlayStation
Submitted 1 day ago by Agent_Karyo@lemmy.world to games@lemmy.world
https://www.techspot.com/news/108554-steam-now-generates-three-times-more-revenue-capcom.html
Comments
dutchkimble@lemy.lol 8 hours ago
chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 hours ago
I think they technically do, with stuff like Helldivers 2, Spiderman games, etc. I have Helldivers 2, but stopped playing it for a while in protest when they tried to make you use a PlayStation account for it, essentially cutting off a bunch of players in countries PlayStation doesn’t operate in.
jacksilver@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
The wording is a little weird, but it’s about Capcom finances. They make more selling games on steam than selling on the Playstation. So steam/pc is a bigger market than Playstation consoles for Capcom.
dutchkimble@lemy.lol 1 hour ago
Ah got it
CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
I hope more game companies will follow. Consoles are good. Consoles exclusives are not.
Drekaridill@feddit.is 1 day ago
Then maybe they should fucking optimise their PC ports.
zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 10 hours ago
To be fair performance was poopy on ps5 too
Ashtear@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Still amazed how well Wilds sold after that dumpster fire of a demo.
I’d also recommend they open up the co-op more, but common sense multiplayer seems a bridge too far 🙄
Drekaridill@feddit.is 1 day ago
I am one of the unfortunate ones for whom the demo ran perfectly, so I thought the full release would too. It did not.
ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
I agree, but they have no incentive to do so when gamers buy it anyway. People need to vote with their wallets.
Call of Duty sales suggest this isn’t happening.
answersplease77@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
People need to vote with their wallets.
that’s why many companies seek to optimize their ports to work for mobile gaming. call of duty mobile -vs- cod pc or console is a case of that imo
moody@lemmings.world 1 day ago
People do vote with their wallets. They say it’s ok.
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 day ago
While it’s great that they’re doing on the only open gaming platform, it’s a shame that they’re being rewarded for infecting their games with anti-consumer malware.
duchess@feddit.org 11 hours ago
[deleted]BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
It exists solely to rob consumers of ownership of their purchases. It can, has, and will continue to result in people losing access to products they have paid for and to which have every right. Performance impact is beside the point. DRM is theft and Denuvo is the worst.
scratchee@feddit.uk 10 hours ago
There are 2 schools of thought. Those that are against the entire concept of software that tries to control how you use it, drm/anticheat/etc in any form is malware to them. And those that accept it might be acceptable in principle (eg for anticheat especially), but believe denouvo and certain other drm programs go too far and cross a line (especially when they hook into the kernel or start tracking things outside the game that they have no business tracking).
mohab@piefed.social 1 day ago
Fantastic, now when are we getting Steam ports of Viewtiful Joe and God Hand?
Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 day ago
we’ve come a long way since the days of console exclusives with no pc ports to this. I remember feeling happy that more publishers started releasing games on PC, now it’s just expected.
ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
I mean……… yeah
ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Of course it does, the install base dwarfs PlayStation. Go where the money is to find money. Business is not that hard.
duchess@feddit.org 11 hours ago
The install base with hardware capable of running their main releases though is probably dwarfed by PlayStation.
Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Who could have guessed that when game companies make their games available for sale, they will make money from game sales!?