GOTY

Comments

• Isa@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  source

  • ivanafterall@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Image

    source

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      Image

      infinitechess.org

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  I still prefer 5D Chess With Multiverse Time Travel

  source

  • mkwt@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Category: existential horror.

    source
  • moonburster@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    I’ve seen this and the trailer is enough to give me migraine

    source
• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Here comes the queen with a 200 space jump to the living room, looking for a possible flank…

  source
• EleventhHour@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  I still prefer

  Image

  source
• mamg22@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Naviary on youtube has made just that. Their videos are amazing, mostly going over the theory created by having an infinite chessboard (“mate in omega” and it’s sequel are mind boggling), and some are about the technical aspects of implementing infinite chess. Highly recommend watching them.

  source

  • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Hell yeah, I came in here specifically to post about those videos. Infinite chess gets extremely much more buck wild than you’d initially expect.

    source
• dsilverz@thelemmy.club ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    That’s neat, I’d never heard of it before!

    It is an open question whether an Angel of some power k can escape forever.

    Looks like you’re quoting the Proceedings of 11th Annual International Conference on Computing and Combinatorics from 2005: dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2958119.2958180

    Apparently, it was solved (twice!) the next year.

    In late 2006, the original problem was solved when independent proofs appeared, showing that an angel can win. Bowditch proved that a 4-angel (that is, an angel with power k = 4) can win[2] and Máthé[3] and Kloster[4] gave proofs that a 2-angel can win.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_problem

    source
• ngn@lemy.lol ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  i like how they wrote “two” in parentheses next to “2”

  source

  • Fillicia@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    That’s how you recognize a technical drafter. That and handwriting only in uppercase.

    source
• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  From the toilet in the bathroom, you move when you’ve got a movement.

  source

  • Venator@lemmy.nz ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    You’ve heard of correspondence chess, how about commode-ance chess?

    source

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      I think you miss the opportunity to use “correspond-ass chess”

      source
• bruhduh@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Looks like Slavic chess

  source
• GeorgimusPrime@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  There should be Voyager 1 and 2 pieces on this board

  source

  • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    There are, they’re just a bit out of frame.

    source
• Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  It’s called go

  source
• Donjuanme@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  G2 is finally viable?

  source

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    And white finally has a mate in 3 moves!

    source
• Etterra@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  When you can move your Knight off the board so you can make a flanking cavalry charge.

  source
• Nasan@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Pawns just can’t catch a break

  source

  • brown567@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    I was gonna say, that’s a pretty big nerf

    source
• lugal@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Chess 2.0? Finally

  source
• wjrii@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Looks shitty.

  source