Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Professor meow meow

⁨952⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨awwwyissss@lemm.ee⁩ to ⁨science_memes@mander.xyz⁩

https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/abd9f79d-59ab-47d2-a4c6-912be9f657c5.webp

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Are you guys serious the cat obviously wrote the paper and just needed the Professor human for credibility. This is just like that movie with the rat in the chef hat , but it’s a cat and a physicist

    source
    • ryannathans@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Do you think it was a cat in the hat

      source
    • Shard@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I think you mean Raccacoonie, the raccoon?

      source
    • Rolando@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Cattenheimer.

      source
  • lowleveldata@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I would too, like to speak to the co-author

    source
    • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Pspspspsps

      source
  • fristislurper@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Anyone have an recent example of FDC Willard being thanked in a paper? I couldn’t find any, sadly

    source
    • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      There are some listed on the Wikipedia page, which also contains this gem in the ‘quick facts’ section.

      Known for. First cat to co-author a physics paper

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F._D._C._Willard

      source
    • Rolando@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      But I guess we can have “FDC Willard numbers” in the same way we can have Erdős numbers, right?

      source
  • riodoro1@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    how is it that cats make everything better?

    source
    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      By being perfect wonderful creatures. Duh.

      source
  • humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That’s a long lasting tradition to use “we” even in solo authored papers. I believe even Newton did this

    source
    • summerof69@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      That’s a long lasting tradition to use “we” even in solo authored papers. We believe even Newton did this

      source
      • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        If our knowledge is based on our forebears, it would always be we.

        source
    • Mo5560@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      The 2nd referee will nonetheless tell you to get rid of all of them

      source
      • humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        The second referee once told us that our paper should not be published at all.

        Eventually, it made it to the Editor’s choice section of the journal

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Shareni@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Yup, that was a requirement for most papers at my uni. We also use the plural you to show respect, even when talking to a single person.

      source
      • humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Reject modernity, embrace tradition 😆

        source
  • Grass@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This makes me happy

    source
  • Rolando@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Sure, it’s a cute story, but what about prof’s grad students sitting in the background with weepy eyes?

    source
    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      They should know better than be where the public can see them

      source
  • scarilog@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Find and replace “I” with “we”? Nah, we adding the kitty

    source
    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Find and replace

      a feature typewriters used in 1975 were famous for

      source
      • scarilog@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Didn’t catch the year ahaha

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      that’s how you end up with dawizards

      source
      • fckreddit@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I was confused at first. Then, I realized that when they replaced ‘mage’ with ‘wizard’, ‘damage’ became ‘dawizard’. It is actually hilarious.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • pancakesyrupyum@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        On my device that’s one of those websites that don’t allow using the Back button.

        Neat.

        source
    • Mo5560@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Isn’t “I” considered poor form? I was taught to always write in passive but “we” is kind of the accepted exception.

      source
  • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    He does exude an air of competence and arrogance in equal measure. Clearly tenured.

    source
  • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This is totally valid. Rubber duck debugging is a thing. Heck, I’ve literally been a “Rubber Duck” for more than one person. I’m sure that Chester heard enough of the theory of the paper to claim the title of “Rubber Duck Live Cat Debugger.”

    source
  • woodytrombone@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/…/PhysRevLett.35.1442

    The referenced paper

    source
    • hswolf@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      damn, I thought there would be a pawprint

      source
      • Dicska@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        The pawprint we were all looking for.

        source
  • ParabolicMotion@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It would have been a really hot topic of discussion if his last name had been Schrödinger.

    source
  • CyberTailor@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Reminds me of Yuri Knorozov and his cat Asya

    source