K0W4LSK1
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on For security reasons 5 days ago:
Catch all is better you can see who’s selling your email lol
- Comment on For security reasons 5 days ago:
Its only a hassle because they want to read all your emails. Self hosting shouldn’t be hard it should be an option for everyone always.
- Comment on Never Forget 1 week ago:
OK a reason to not like him but sending him to prison for his views that he didnt act on sounds like fasicm lol I dont agree with his views just saying
- Comment on Never Forget 1 week ago:
I mean thousands of war criminals were offered jobs after ww2 so I doubt they would care about a little red tape just hire them into the black no one needs to know
- Comment on Never Forget 1 week ago:
That also may be so, but 35 years is fucked up for that. pretty sure child porn first time offenders is like 15 to 30 so hacking MIT for stuff that should have been free gets you more jail time then a first CP offence. OK thats fucked up
- Comment on Zelda 64: Recompiled for PC - Majora's Mask Release Trailer 1 week ago:
Just find the original you left on archive.org
- Comment on Bruh, take a break already 1 week ago:
They already took you if you seen them why do you think you feel like you’ve been just looking at memes all night?
- Comment on we love those power laws 2 weeks ago:
Lol fucking america of course its already made
- Comment on we love those power laws 2 weeks ago:
Until they make the Fat Man
- Comment on Anon gets upvotes on reddit 2 weeks ago:
Both probably
- Comment on We're all a little crazy 2 weeks ago:
That is such a weird way of putting it I believe its more the single consciousness wants to like experience because knowing everything is like pointless so it fragmentes into these piece of its conscienceness and we populate the universe experiencing. Maybe different theories but also not my theory lol
- Comment on We're all a little crazy 2 weeks ago:
OK but what is a “conscience entity”
- Comment on I knew it 5 weeks ago:
Austin powers was trying to tell us this
- Comment on magic beneath the forests 5 weeks ago:
Oh my gosh I’m so dumb I never even put that together. That’s so cool. He does have interesting theories but he’s also saving old growth forests well trying and he’s doing breakthrough research in the medical attributes of mushrooms.
- Comment on Professor meow meow 5 weeks ago:
Are you guys serious the cat obviously wrote the paper and just needed the Professor human for credibility. This is just like that movie with the rat in the chef hat , but it’s a cat and a physicist
- Comment on magic beneath the forests 5 weeks ago:
People should look up Paul Stamets. Dude is doing amazing things in the field of mycology and showing the power of mushrooms!
- Comment on I used to be with it, then they changed what "it" is 5 weeks ago:
Its all circular because pogs was first
- Comment on Anon learns about nuts 5 weeks ago:
This is fucking spot on. The heavy breathing part had me wheezing
- Comment on Ask ChatGPT to pick a number between 1 and 100 5 weeks ago:
Interpretation for sure. Bells theory and then it being proven winning a Nobel prize to me only proves more we really don’t understand the world around us and only perceive what we need to survive. And that maybe we should be less standoffish to ideas that change our current paradigm, because we obviously have a lot to learn.
- Comment on Ask ChatGPT to pick a number between 1 and 100 5 weeks ago:
Even quantum just appears random I think. it’s beyond our scope of perspective, it works in multiple dimensions. we only see part of the process. That’s my guess though it could be totally wrong
- Comment on Ask ChatGPT to pick a number between 1 and 100 5 weeks ago:
Maybe randomness is a label we slapped on shit we don’t understand.
- Comment on double slit 1 month ago:
I can obviously ponder it. I’ve shown that. It’s just that there’s no reason to believe it’s any more real than Harry Potter is. It may make you feel nice, but it doesn’t do anything. If consciousness can’t be defined by whoever is positing the idea then it’s not useful to consider.
You thought about it for a second and actually thought yeah living things having a conscience is fiction? What I don’t really know how to respond to that If consciousness is just derived from the activity in our brain it’s not hard to assume that animals atleast are aware of their conscious being on some small way. That is most definitely more believable then god or Harry Potter.
Just because something can’t be defined yet doesn’t mean we won’t eventually be able to. But you know we gotta get there and again I am not saying these theories are right I commented on a meme.
I love what you said about string theory I would agree but you said it’s wrong and maybe this is too and maybe something useful will come out of it but maybe not.
- Comment on double slit 1 month ago:
Nothing here has anything to do with consciousness. You can recreate this experiment with no one in the room and it will behave exactly the same, and has a sound (if very confusing conventionally) mathematical cause.
First I was commenting on a meme wasn’t expecting these comments lol. but we are active in the experiment that is the point to show that it changes states because we observe Why does that happen and why don’t we don’t know it’s position til observed. It doesn’t matter if we are in the room or not we could be 1000 miles away watching on webcam and the same thing happens because we observed it and my side note QM is fucking magic dude
- Comment on double slit 1 month ago:
If the conscious observer thing were true, what would it decide is consciousness? Would it require sapience? Sentience? Does it happen for dolphins? Apes? Monkeys? Mice? Tardigrades? What level of synapse connections is it waiting for to decide that’s enough? What about humans born without a brain? Can they not see anything? This hypothesis requires so many weird assumptions that it’s less than useless. A god existing makes more sense.
Idk why that is so hard for you to even ponder
Science requires testable and verifiable hypothesis. If they can’t be falsified they aren’t a part of science. They’re a belief system. That’s fine to have, but don’t mix it with science. All you’ll do is end up not accepting more data as we learn it because you’re filtering it through faith.
So string theory isn’t science either show me where strong theory has been proven in any sort of fashion
- Comment on double slit 1 month ago:
philosophynow.org/…/The_Case_For_Panpsychism
There is a case for even the most fundamental particles having a basic form of consciousness. And there is studies and theories being created this is just new science and extremely hard for materialists to wrap their heads around I understand that. here are some other sources you can check out for data that I posted on another comment as well Donald Hoffman Ted talk Papers from bernardoAnd I want to finish off I do not fully believe these theories. They are that just theories just like most things in science start off and still are today.
- Comment on double slit 1 month ago:
Sure I agree it could be that as well but there is no actual way to prove that. Since we don’t actually understand what it is or how it works we can’t remove it, therefore with materialism it’s not provable either way. it’s also another theory and why I started my original comment with maybe. It’s better to explore that data in my opinion then outright deny it without any actual evidence proving it’s not. Occams razor is a cop out here
- Comment on double slit 1 month ago:
Your my favourite person in this comment section never stop learning!
- Comment on double slit 1 month ago:
Thanks for being open minded and at least looking at the data before you draw your conclusion
- Comment on double slit 1 month ago:
What is magic dude Fucking biobots man
- Comment on double slit 1 month ago:
Ok but how do you actually remove consciousness from the experiment?