Homie really said AMAB.
Comment on Smart
reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 3 days agoI tried to google it and it’s not super clear. -Perelman gets his phd in russia super young and is hired at NYU/SUNY -Publishes some groundbreaking stuff on arxiv (a free site to post white papers in math and physics) in 2002/2003 -There is some drama with another scientist who is known for stealing people’s work trying to downplay Perelman’s contribution -Perelman quits his US jobs and returns to russia to work in math (making wayyyyyyy less money), then quits that job too and becomes a recluse -Turns down fields medal and millennium prize (1M dollars for solving) -Says some mathematicians are unethical but the rest of them tolerate it so they’re shit too so the whole thing is shit. Also says he doesn’t want to be put in a zoo or treated like a pet about it.
— I’m going to go ahead and assume I don’t understand enough about being a math superstar to understand where he’s coming from, but he certainly sounds like a principled guy and now I respect him.
turnipjs@lemmy.ml 3 days ago
TheBat@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Says some mathematicians are unethical but the rest of them tolerate it so they’re shit too so the whole thing is shit.
AMAB?
untorquer@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Just a few bad apples.
SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Here’s the revised problem:
Problem:
A fruit vendor receives a shipment of 500 apples. It is known that for every bad apple in a bunch, the entire bunch spoils. The apples are packed into bunches of 10. After inspecting the shipment, the vendor finds that 5% of the apples are bad.
How many bunches of apples will spoil due to bad apples?
diffusive@lemmy.world 2 days ago
between 30 and 250, depending from the distribution… And your point is? 🤷
milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 2 days ago
How many?
It’s complex.
untorquer@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Don’t be so hyperbolic
DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
Screw you apples, I’m gonna go hang with the mushrooms.
FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
I mean math is the backbone of science and technology. And technology can lead to fucked up things.
Nuclear bombs wouldn’t be possible without fairly recent math.
Not to mention the unethical hell that is the whole financial sector / trader type where mathematicians often end up working.
And finally these days, by making new discoveries in some fields your directly contributing to the growth of AI and LLMs.
An infamous example of someone who quit math over ethical concerns (ironic given the rest of the story) is Ted Kacyznski (the unabomber), who saw math as leading to more and more advanced technology which oppresses people and destroys nature.
AEsheron@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I think his issues more stemmed from academia and the rat race within it, not so much the ethical issues of mathematics and what they can lead to. Just shitty crabs trying to escape the bucket.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 days ago
When you’re just crabs in a bucket, be the sea slug that got dredged up with the rest.
quinacridone@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 days ago
I too find economists unethical by trade. Statisticians with a gambling problem, the lot of them.
FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
😆
Omniraptor@lemm.ee 2 days ago
This new Yorker article goes into some more detail. Apparently there was some underlying conflict between rival Chinese academics over succession of university admin postings in Beijing.
According to the article it was one Chinese dude trying to hog credit and Perelman basically went “oh i’m not brave enough for politics” and bailed. If he accepted his choice was basically becoming a conformist or getting involved by trying to improve things. He chose not to choose.
Most problems require the insights of several mathematicians in order to be solved, and the profession has evolved a standard for crediting individual contributions that is as stringent as the rules governing math itself. As Perelman put it, “If everyone is honest, it is natural to share ideas.” Many mathematicians view Yau’s conduct over the Poincaré as a violation of this basic ethic, and worry about the damage it has caused the profession. “Politics, power, and control have no legitimate role in our community, and they threaten the integrity of our field,” Phillip Griffiths said.
Yokozuna@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I’m totally for how and why he dipped out. I’ve made a few decisions in life in a similar fashion. But a man as principled as he is, with feelings and ideas that intense, is a hell of a thing to lose in the pursuit of truth. Just imagine, if instead of resigning to almost insurmountable odds where most would be against him, he instead chose to be a stubborn man in the opposite respect and didn’t rest until the truth and was common knowledge or had created groups and institutions to further pursue it if not able to do it himself.
Things like this are way bigger than one person, and to understand the problem and try to tackle it would consume your whole life. Go on and pick some mushrooms my man. You made your contribution to society and decided the rat race isn’t worth it.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 days ago
Goals.
474D@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Damn I didn’t know mathematicians go this hard.
daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Most mathematicians I know go REALLY hard. There’s something about the field…
Yokozuna@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Punk rock as fuck. May this dude find many morsels and enjoy the morning dew for the rest of his days.