I did assume vegans would be majority against honey consumption.
Comment on I'm right and the other vegans are wrong
OwOarchist@pawb.social 10 hours ago
The fun part is that this doesn’t even tell me which side of the honey debate you’re on.
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Gladaed@feddit.org 9 hours ago
The right side
ccunning@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Not a vegan but I am surprised to learn there is a debate amongst vegans about honey.
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 hours ago
Honey is an animal byproduct, so technically it is non-vegan, but I think that’s kind of pedantic because the bees (ideally) aren’t harmed by the apiaries, and the relationships is more of symbiosis rather than exploitation.
I’ve tried explaining this to vegans and they get really hostile about how apiaries are bee slavery and we need to abolish all forms of subjugation and exploitation, and that I’m a colonialist pig for not seeing it that way.
They also talk about some of the problems with large-scale apiary practices. But those problems are very much known within beekeeping communities, and the average small-time beekeeper is as upset as any vegan about giant corporate monocultures spreading parasites and diseases.
The beekeepers are also very active in trying to solve that problem by regulating large-scale apiary practices, monitoring bee colonies, medicating, funding (and participating in) research, etc… All stuff that most vegans couldn’t be bothered to do.
It’s a bit like being against backyard chickens because Tyson and Perdue are an evil industrial ag duopoly.
Spur4383@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
So… they saw the bee movie and considered a documentary?
ccunning@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Do/can domesticated bees swarm/rewild?
If so it seems like it would be the best argument that bee keeping was mutually consensual.
Are there apiary industry standards/certifications? It seems unlikely most folks are buying the backyard chicken version of honey.
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 hours ago
It is possible. When a colony grows too large for the hive it produces a new queen and then splits itself in half. Usually beekeepers who monitor their colonies notice this and start a new hive, but if left to do their own thing (and if there’s not a queen trap on the entrance) then one of the queens will take half the colony and go search for a place to build a new hive.
I generally agree, but how do you define that? You can’t exactly get a bee to sign a legal document. Sure you could opt against using a queen trap, and make your hive as enticing as possible so they stay. A good apiary will provide ideal conditions, and cultuvate botanical and herb gardens in the immediate surroundings. Basically make it a paradise for bees, and give them medicine too.
Just because some people abuse their dogs doesn’t mean pet-keeping as a whole should be damned. Punish the abusers and prevent the abuse as much as you can. But don’t take away granny’s sweet little shitzu just because Dale down the street kicks his pit.
That unfortunately depends on the state. Some do a better job than others.
Yes but try asking a vegan “Is it fine if I only choose local honey?”
9point6@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
I’m not at all, vegan as a personal trait is a bit of a broad church these days.
There’s the people that are mostly motivated by the not-killing-animals thing
Then there’s the ones doing it predominantly for environmental reasons
Then you’ve got the ones doing it for various health reasons
Then you’ve got people doing it predominantly for cost reasons (fewer here, given vegan is still treated as a luxury aspect in a lot of food categories)
Those groups do not have to overlap in views at all. It’s entirely expected for there to be disagreement and purity test drama given that IMO
igmelonh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 hours ago
Yeah, I’m not in any vegan groups but I’ve seen (what is hopefully) a vocal online minority of those who use the label for killing-is-wrong reasons angrier at folks using it for any other reason than they are at folks who do consume animal products, insisting that the other camps should use “plant-based (diet)” instead.
kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
I’ve known people who called themselves vegan and still ate fish, there are basically no rules
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 hours ago
That’s pescatarian, not vegan. Whoever said that was wrong.
But I recognize that confidently saying something is wrong is viewed as arrogant these days. We have to respect everyone’s subjectivity, even if that means not saying anything even when they’re blatantly wrong.
Like “No, don’t keep walking forward. There’s a cliff in front of you.” “DON’T TELL ME WHAT TO DO! YOU CAN’T CONTROL ME.”
Toxic positivity has seeped way too far into the collective unconscious…
OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 hours ago
(And for some reason, ‘vegetarian’ has gone completely out of fashion…)
kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
They justified it as something to do with fish/shellfish not having the same kind of pain receptors and consciousness that “real” animals do and argued it was more akin to consuming fungi and bacteria
I don’t agree with them, and I do agree with everything you said here. I’m just saying, based on experiences in the field, when someone says to me “I’m vegan” internally I’m like “cool, so you eat whatever you want, just like everyone else” 😂
lime@feddit.nu 9 hours ago
yeah the fda classifies it as a meat product.
remon@ani.social 9 hours ago
That’s just a myth spread around the internet.
Their actual definition is:
www.fda.gov/media/110846/download
lime@feddit.nu 8 hours ago
a definition is not a classification though. how to they categorise it?