[threatens with ISO-8601]
Comment on I'm just better
Spooge@lemmy.world 5 weeks agoI’m an American, and I refuse to switch to metric time.
Bahnd@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Spooge@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Today is May 6th.
Bahnd@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
[Runs away hissing] 2026-06-05T18:25:00+00:00
HeHoXa@lemmy.zip 5 weeks ago
This thread has been cleansed
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 weeks ago
Why not? What’s wrong with having a day composed of 1000 chroners, or 1 kilochroner which can be divided into either 10 centichroners or 100 decachroners?
We can even divide each chroner into 1000 millichroners, or for scientific purposes, a million microchroners, a billion nanochroners, or a trillion picochroners.
So much more sense than 60 seconds times 60 minutes times 24 hours. What even is a second, anyway? When was it defined as a constant, by whom, and against what reference? It’s completely arbitrary, I tell you!
And then when you extend that to 7 days, times 4 to 4.43 weeks, times 12 months before you finally get into decimals (decades, centuries, millenia, etc.), it’s insanity!
PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
As a true believer in SI units, nonetheless:
When was it [the “second”, the smallest unit of time-measure under insanity-rules for unit hierarchy] defined as a constant, by whom, and against what reference?
I have to notice, as a long-time student of being-a-person - for ~most folks, a “second” is reasonably close to the length of a single heartbeat. It’s imprecise (badly depending on lots of stuff), and so maybe I’m just finding coincidence that has nothing to do with anything.
BUT if we’re talkin bout earliest references for attempting to “measure” ongoing time, I mean, look no further, fellow probable-human-with-heartbeat!
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 weeks ago
60 bpm is about typical for a resting heart rate, I suppose. So that could make sense.
About as much sense as positing that humans use decimal numeral systems (ignoring whatever the fuck the Romans used) because they have ten fingers.
No way to really confirm, but it seems a likely guess.
I wonder if Parmenides talks about it at all…
Also, how did they even standardize this before digital clocks? Like did the first clock maker tell all his apprentices “This clock ticks every second. One tick is one second. Every clock you make must tick at exactly the same rate.”
PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
Easy-peasy, first clock-maker set their metronome to 60 bpm, fiddled with the fiddly bits on the clock until no one could hear a difference. Said to apprentices, “see?”
Spooge@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Daylight saving.
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 weeks ago
Now that that’s going away maybe we’ll finally have metric time. The age of the chroner is upon us!
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 5 weeks ago
WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
Thanks for posting this. That was an interesting read.
TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
Yeah, how else would you say “a quarter past eight”, like “15 centimeters past eight”? It makes no sense!
Spooge@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Exactly
JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
UTC isn’t metric time. LOL
Spooge@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Metric time isn’t real. That’s the joke.
JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
Spooge@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
You are not fun.
mech@feddit.org 5 weeks ago
OK then keep using your American Football innings per school shooting.
MintyFresh@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Image
Jerb322@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Danm…ha ha