I hate to play the devil’s advocate here, especially since I believe that all MAGAs are douchebags, but his stupid statement could also be interpreted a different way, like maybe he meant that he impregnates his wife every time he gives her an orgasm.So, like, once a year, tops.
Comment on Is it gay to have pleasurable sex with your wife?
dwzap@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s really sad to see what Donald has done to people’s brains. Enjoying good sex with one’s wife is now checks notes gay, and raping children on an island is checks notes Ephebophilia.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 day ago
robocall@lemmy.world 1 day ago
But he can get her off without his dick if he wanted
rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 day ago
implying ephebophilia isn’t bad
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 day ago
people who care about the difference between ephebophilia and pedophilia are the kind of people who deserve being called pedos.
ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 14 hours ago
Or clinical psychiatrists.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 day ago
If it keeps these people from breeding, then there’s your silver lining.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 day ago
This isn’t Trump. This is standard conservative brainworms going back to the Limbaugh Era and before. Just textbook Protestant-flavored Homophobic Misogyny. Dig through James Dobson’s prodigious backlog of public brainfarts or poke around in the Joe Pyne archives, you’ll find similar sentiments and commentary.
Anything that gives a person undeserved pleasure is sinful. And the Protestant Work Ethic teaches us that only productive economy-stimulating labor is a worthwhile pursuit. Sex is a job, not a hobby. You do it to make the babies, not to experience any kind of corporeal pleasure.
That falls under the “Very Rich Guy’s Addendum” to the Protestant Work Ethic. If you’re rich, it proves you worked harder than everyone else and none of the rules apply.
Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
There have been a number of religious secs that believed pleasure during sex was sinful. The Shakers forbade sex altogether, thus, no more Shakers. Others accepted that sex was necessary but tried to come up with methods to remove or decrease the pleasure. A blanket strung down the middle of the bed with a hole in it.
incompetent@programming.dev 1 day ago
Ever heard of Mormons “soaking?” LOL:
They think of it as a loophole to get around the whole “no sex before marriage” thing.
I learned about the Shakers and Quakers back in elementary school but can’t remember much about them. I didn’t know they were celibate. So I looked into it and there are only 3 left in the U.S.
Interesting. Thank for showing me a rabbit hole to dive down.
Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 11 hours ago
I picked up a fascinating book about Shaker furniture and architecture at a thrift store a while ago. Their religious ideals led to some extremely functional designs of furniture and structures that honestly can still be useful today. For example, Shaker chairs are designed with extra tall backs to be able to be hung up on the wall to make it easy to sweep underneath them when cleaning
I’ve seen a theory that the shakers were specifically founded by a handful of aromantic/asexual folks and basically built a community for aro/ace folk before any acknowledgement of these concepts existed. Given their views on equality and functionality it does not take much of a leap of the imagination to see how such a community could form from a bunch of autistic aro/ace folks in a period when any of those characteristics would make it difficult to survive