Whelks_chance
@Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
- Comment on shoe 2 weeks ago:
Got it. I’ll be in touch. Online shitposting is the same as a binding contract, right?
- Comment on shoe 2 weeks ago:
Can you pay me $100 to not create art? I wasn’t likely to anyway, but this sounds like a decent side gig to get into.
- Comment on What are some video game quotes that is stuck in your head? 4 weeks ago:
Snaaaaaake
- Comment on UK needs cyber security professionals, but won't pay up 1 month ago:
I was thinking the same. This will attract people who are essentially independently wealthy, and so don’t actually need this income. Which adds a nice classism based barrier to entry too.
- Comment on Row as Starmer suggests landlords and shareholders are not ‘working people’ 1 month ago:
I know plenty of people who work full time in real jobs, and also rent out a house. Renting a single building doesn’t give you enough to quit your job where I live.
- Comment on Ah yes, regression 1 month ago:
You asked for a line, they gave you a line, what more can be asked for?
We used to intentionally add wrong data to our datasets so we could circle it afterwards, declare it “outlying data” and gain the extra points for spotting and documenting it.
I’m not bitter about my formal education, honest…
- Comment on hard to argue with 1 month ago:
Female presenting profile pic, we don’t actually know anything about the human who typed it
- Comment on Iguanadons 2 months ago:
It might even have been on the cover. I wonder how many glow-in-the-dark trex skeletons still exist?
- Comment on Self care 2 months ago:
I have become comfortably numb
- Comment on Treegasmic 2 months ago:
Beekake
- Comment on Life imitates art? 2 months ago:
Pretty sure that’s not how captures work. You don’t fail them, you add to the training set. You’re against the masses as to whether they considered it a traffic light when they were shown it.
- Comment on I'm radicalised by this photo 2 months ago:
Sounds quite zen. Might be nice
- Comment on i need an rv, and lab equipment, and a helper 2 months ago:
Medication
- Comment on The age of wood 4 months ago:
Also a good way to make sure it doesn’t have any more birthdays
- Comment on Anon has a question 4 months ago:
My parents could keep that going for a good long time by filtering it through a few layers of kitchen paper, it got rid of a lot of the burnt stuff, came out quite clear each time.
- Comment on Mushroom Guides 4 months ago:
I’m less interested in the total number of species, and more interested in my likelihood of holding one
- Comment on Mushroom Guides 4 months ago:
Pretty sure those general rules are given to the SAS for when dropped behind enemy lines in a jungle setting. I think I heard it from a Ray Mears book.
- Comment on Meatly Receives UK Approval for Cultivated Meat in Pet Food 5 months ago:
I like this idea. Animals care far less about the texture of meat, which I think is one of the most common complaints about meat substitute food eaten by humans.
- Comment on This product will eliminate odours in your home, but only in one plane 6 months ago:
The Square, the protagonist in Flatland
- Comment on Chicken vs Egg 6 months ago:
Is it a chicken egg if it came from a chicken, or contains a chicken?
- Comment on Chicken vs Egg 6 months ago:
Maybe
- Comment on military industrial publishing complex 7 months ago:
Yup, been there, but the other side of it. Was hired to do research and then teaching suddenly appeared as an expectation.
- Comment on military industrial publishing complex 7 months ago:
Sure, that would work. Or government grants available so anyone who wants to be an editor can apply for funds to get it going. Papers are rarely printed on paper nowadays, so the main costs would be paying editors, paying reviewers, and web hosting.
- Comment on military industrial publishing complex 7 months ago:
I didn’t say it was the publisher’s paying the salaries. My point is that researcher are paid to research, and publishing results is part of that.
- Comment on military industrial publishing complex 7 months ago:
Not to argue on behalf of publishers, but the papers aren’t written for free. It’s part of the job of being a researcher, it’s a significant KPI for which you’re hired and receive a wage.
Reviewing for free is pretty much bullshit though. As is paying to read them afterwards, if your research institution doesn’t pay to publish in an open access journal
- Comment on I'm 99% sure it's not real 11 months ago:
Ah, Pareto
- Comment on Lifehack for naive schoolchildren 11 months ago:
What are birds?