lurklurk
@lurklurk@lemmy.world
- Comment on Anon tries programming in Java 1 week ago:
Python has its drawbacks but it also has a pretty useful standard library so as a language for small scripts, one can do much worse
- Comment on Anon tries programming in Java 1 week ago:
“giving up against the endless weight of capitalism”
We just call it “having a job” nowadays
- Comment on Anon tries programming in Java 1 week ago:
It’s like 5 lines of code
- Comment on Anon tries programming in Java 1 week ago:
Hello World
30 minutes of boilerplate
writing imports
$ cat <<EOF > Hello.java public class Hello { public static void main(String args[]) { System.out.println("Hello world!"); } } EOF $ java Hello.java Hello world!
ok
- Comment on If the EU uses online signature for European Citizen's Initiative, why isn't voting online for elections or policies not allowed? 1 week ago:
Because
A: electronic voting is an awful idea in so many ways
B: direct demoracy is an awful idea in so many ways
C: voting is supposed to be secret which the petition signaures aern’t
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 2 weeks ago:
I’d probably vote for the option causing a bit less suffering in Gaza, as hard as I could. I would not refuse to vote because the lesser evil was still bad.
It’s not hard really
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 2 weeks ago:
R is pushing more support for Israel so D is the lesser evil. There’s a reason Netanyahu wanted Trump. If you think it couldn’t get worse than D level support, stay tuned
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 2 weeks ago:
Kanye West?
well at least you’re consistent…
Btw, your chosen course of actions indirectly supported the option of spending even more tax dollars on killing people in gaza, so you might want to consider breaking your consistent streak of picking the wrong choice and try woting in a way that aligns with your stated goals
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 2 weeks ago:
So it’s the moral argument of killing kids now in the hope of making a point that might or might not affect future politicians?
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 2 weeks ago:
It doesn’t have to make sense for people to convince themselves to do it. It will certainly lead to worse outcomes for gaza
If yoor morals disregard the probable outcomes and is more focused on normative rules you could make some arguments but that kind of purity won’t save a single starving child in gaza