fracture
@fracture@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- Comment on me looking at my 190 cm/110 kg daddy 9 hours ago:
😄😭 it’s still pretty tall… i could be a lot worse off. i’m not really interested in attracting the same crowd that most men are, anyways
- Comment on me looking at my 190 cm/110 kg daddy 17 hours ago:
mostly answered here lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/21006653
sorry, idk how to do instance-agnostic links 😭
- Comment on me looking at my 190 cm/110 kg daddy 17 hours ago:
i’m not really a big gym guy, my activity is largely functional, although sometimes i’m fudging it (been taking a large box of stuff on a walk, for example)
there’s some newer science showing artificial loading of weight will lead to a reduction in bodyfat, so i’ve been wearing a weighted vest. between that and walking a lot, i have lost a lot of bodyfat but also built substantial muscle because… i’m heavier
so maybe something like that could help you get workouts in?
- Comment on me looking at my 190 cm/110 kg daddy 1 day ago:
it’s CRAZY how much bigger men are than women
i used to be a pretty big woman, 5’10/180 lbs. then i transitioned. same height (height gain on t is basically not real, unfortunately), and i weigh around 200 lbs. but now it’s WAY more muscle (no more boobs + at around 20% bodyfat). i’m built like a fucking tank now, i feel like i occupy so much more space horizontally. my neck and shoulders and arms and legs and everything are so much THICKER
(also, it turns out, men eat WAY MORE than women, too. all this extra mass doesn’t support itself 💀 easily need an extra 1000+ calories nowadays)
- Comment on brand new sentence 3 days ago:
yeah, it’s crazy how issues i had dealt with for like half my life went away after braces (chronic nasal issues)
braces are NOT only cosmetic!! (what i’m assuming you meant to write)
- Comment on Well damn. Glad he's dead. 1 week ago:
“women should behave a certain way to not justify misogyny” comes off about as well as “black people should behave a certain way to not justify racism”, imo
i appreciate your intentions, but this is not the way
- Comment on A stone cold quote machine 3 weeks ago:
ah yes, from the evil 90s,
- Comment on Anon watches redditors talk about bodycount 5 weeks ago:
i genuinely do not “intuitively understand” this idea. there’s nothing contradictory about being a hoe and a housewife
can you like, explain this? i really don’t understand how having multiple sexual relationships, specifically, diminishes one’s ability to have emotionally fulfilling relationships. if anything, i might be inclined to think they would have more emotionally fulfilling relationships 💀
- Comment on Anon watches redditors talk about bodycount 5 weeks ago:
i think the way you’re describing the process as “screwing around, forming and cutting off attachments” really shows that you think of it in a very black and white sort of way. one can have casual / fwb sex with their friends, and still have a friend relationship with that person. one can even have one-off sex with an acquaintance or stranger, and even if you never meet again, it doesn’t really make it a “cut off” relationship; if you met again, it would be pleasant, circumstances just may not arrange it
just because it’s a more emotionally involved process for you or some people you’ve encountered, doesn’t make it a universal truth
- Comment on Surely has a master's degree 5 weeks ago:
OK, my mistake
but i don’t think he was like, damn, i’m getting amazing head rn, perfect time to blast some piss into my girl’s throat
and an involuntary emission of piss due to sexual stimulation… well, to me, it sounds like there’s a lot of overlap between squirting and what was described!
- Comment on Surely has a master's degree 5 weeks ago:
calling squirting “comprised of some pee” is a little disingenuous, when the bladder can hold 200-400ml of liquid and the female prostate (aka skene’s gland) can hold, generously, 2-4ml (you can read about it in depth in this recent study, which is quite a good read! researchgate.net/…/359790472_Female_ejaculation_a…) even if you’re not precise about how many mls of fluid are expelled during a typical squirt, one would be hard pressed to conclusively state that less than the majority of fluid in a squirt didn’t originate from the bladder. the paper talks about the question of whether or not it’s precisely urine, but the tl;dr is basically that it’s not not urine (more dilute and/or slightly different compositions of urea, creatinine, and uric acid)
speaking from personal experience, at least… as much as i wish it weren’t the case, it’s piss :')
but THAT’S FINE. we don’t need to be in the business of shaming folks for unintentional (or intentional!) emissions of piss during sex! and drawing the line at “squirting (in people with vulvas) is fine because it’s not all piss” is kind of silly because it’s not necessarily going to just be piss from someone with a penis either, and there are for sure women/people with vulvas out there for whom it is just piss, and they’re catching strays here. this is not the pro-feminist stance you think it is
as long as it’s as consensual as you can make it (e.g. if you know for sure it’ll happen ahead of time, inform your partner(s); if you didn’t expect it or think it would happen, that’s the price of admission! things happen), we have no business judging someone for how their body behaves during sex
(directing this to you, but also the other comment on this post, but there’s a lot of information about squirting i wanted to write out, as well. it’s been a subject of my fascination for a few years, and some of the newer research is really interesting to read)
- Comment on Surely has a master's degree 5 weeks ago:
really not a fan of the shaming happening in the other comments for this! sometimes you have fluids come out that you didn’t mean to, it’s not something ANY gender should be shamed for!
also the amount of people commenting on what seems like it was a one-off occasion / situation is crazy
- Comment on Ew why are you like that 5 weeks ago:
damn like… i get it and the meme’s not wrong, but i think a lot of it is so cool. how the circulatory system went (evolutionarily) from being “just squirt blood on all the organs” to the elegant, efficient tube-based system we have. like, it’s kind of insane we have tubes routing blood to our entire body, everything in it, and coming back to a central point
or how there are so many parts of our body that just have a natural microbiome that we coexist with. like we have our own little slice of like… world, inside us
(poop is kinda gross tho, i can’t lie)
- Comment on of course it's by choice why would you even ask 1 month ago:
Unless there’s an expert who can tell me that no, if they’re diagnosed that way they have to be that way, in which case I’d question them as an expert. The brain is complex.
do you not think it’s rude to tell someone who identifies a certain way, that they might change their mind? do you not think it’s rude to act like an expert on their experiences, more than they are? do you not think it’s rude to act like their opinion on themselves only has merit if science backs it up, but act like your opinion is somehow above that standard?
when someone identifies as a different sexuality, as a different gender, it’s polite to give them the basic respect of acknowledging it. any of these things may change, and it’s OK if it does, but it’s very rude to point that out, as if they’ve never had that thought. it’s also invalidating - consider telling a trans person they might reconsider their gender. identification along the aro or ace spectrums deserves the same respect
respectfully, i would ask that you stop commenting on this situation, and reconsider whether your advice is actually contributing positively to the conversation
- Comment on of course it's by choice why would you even ask 1 month ago:
not sure that you were intending this, (maybe you replied to the wrong comment?) but your comment can be read in a bit of a “you’ll get over this aro/ace thing when you meet the right person”
- Comment on Immaculate 1 month ago:
no one ever talks about all of the people who had to ALLOW someone to sleep to the top, either, just the person who did!
- Comment on Bet 1 month ago:
this type of question is how i interpreted this meme. like the question was gonna be some “who would win, superman or goku” type shit LOL
- Comment on doot doot doot 1 month ago:
new booty shorts idea
- Comment on Get Your Freak On 2 months ago:
thought this was a (very late) april fools joke 💀 is this real? is there some recent / relevant reason for it?
- Comment on No, I'm not showing you. 2 months ago:
SHOW US YOUR SHITTY ART!!!
- Comment on it really do be like that 2 months ago:
as a man who is thirsty for men in sundresses
you’re real for that
- Comment on Are Americans Actually Idiots? 2 months ago:
reminder that this situation has been engineered by decades of a billionaire powered machine defunding education and capturing a significant portion of the country in a propaganda machine
like, yea, americans are dumb and shitty, but we’ve largely been made to be this way. it’s not inherent and it’s not unfixable (altho it’s not like it’s solvable overnight, ofc, it took a long time to get here and it’ll take a long time to get out)
- Comment on Anon has anxiety 2 months ago:
alternatively… try hydrating. i thought it was the whole ADHD thing til i realized i get sleepy when i’m dehydrated…
- Comment on human ingenuity knows no bounds 3 months ago:
this is true but i don’t think there are many brands of… this particular device, which are pure silicone. they’re out there, but they’re the minority
- Comment on human ingenuity knows no bounds 3 months ago:
. ::: spoiler fleshlight bong :::
- Comment on Why conservative men repeatedly crash Grindr 3 months ago:
it’s snark, but it’s genuine, too. some people really haven’t heard it. but sure, i could have said it better, that’s fair
the issue is that there are women who have these traits independent of if they happen to belong this “costume”. it’s a look, but it falls within normal human variance. in essence, you’ve said any women who even vaguely has traits like this is a ghoul. besides, people should be allowed to choose how they look
it’s also using the bludgeoning of the oppressor on people you happen to have moral standing over. this meme is still ultimately about their fuckability. sure, you may find them (physically) unfuckable because you believe their appearance is a reflection of their morals. but it’s still not OK to reduce women to their fuckability. it’s the same shit people do when they misgender shitty trans people. it reduces baseline respect to privilege that can be revoked. that’s not baseline respect then lol
(aside, i don’t think the “happen to have marriages of convenience” necessarily follows from the outfit. it might, i guess, i haven’t really looked into the marriage success rates of this group of people. but it’s not like average success rates of marriage are anything to write home about, either)
finally, i would hope that the people in this thread who are being SUPER misogynist about it are like… putting you off. i feel like it’s not great if people are supporting misogyny in your not-misogynistic meme!
this could have been captioned “pedophile wives cabal” or something and i think that would have been fine. re: the above “using the bludgeoning of the oppressor”, it’s always worth questioning yourself about whether you’re dunking on them because they’re shitty people or because they’re women who happen to be shitty people
- Comment on Why conservative men repeatedly crash Grindr 3 months ago:
this post is why people say there’s a misogyny problem here
- Comment on Why conservative men repeatedly crash Grindr 3 months ago:
yea if it’s implying that men are only worth being with because of their looks, it’s sexist, yea. it’s not as sexist because there’s not a societally ingrained idea that a man’s core worth is in his looks. so it’s not like it’s equivalent. but it’s almost like there are different prejudices to different genders
or have you not heard enough people talk about women like they’re worthless because of a perceived lack of attractiveness
- Comment on It's worth a shot. 3 months ago:
no, i just can’t read. it be like this
but i don’t really understand why you seem to get that genAI is bad, but reposted this regardless
- Comment on It's worth a shot. 3 months ago:
ok, my mistake for interpreting the comment where you replied “yes” to the comment asking if you AI slopped this out