lennivelkant
@lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
- Comment on There's no wrong way to stroke it 3 days ago:
Someone else covered it in another reply, but moles have bald areas. Hairy Ball only applies when it’s entirely covered.
- Comment on There's no wrong way to stroke it 3 days ago:
I did not need to know that, but I respect the witty way you communicated it
- Comment on p is for pHunky 3 days ago:
Fair, but also, you could look up XKCD comics by their name or transcript and link to them directly when you come across them.
- Comment on kiwis! 1 week ago:
I think if your organs are all tarred up, you have a problem
- Comment on Baldur's Gayte 1 week ago:
Homotopic: Having the same (homo-) topological properties (-topic)
- Comment on Repent, ye clownish sinner 1 week ago:
I’m in the process of starting a fight with my neighbours. They complained (indirectly) about our garden being unkempt. I asked them for an appointment to talk directly so we can figure out just what the problem is. I’m not doing shit until they can tell me just what part of my little piece of nature is breaking any laws.
- Comment on what is north? 2 weeks ago:
Tthat’s not south of Antarctica though. It’s below, in terms of the map’s perspective, but “absolute south” is the middle of the picture. Anywhere outside Antarctica is north of Antarctica.
- Comment on do you think freewill truly exists? 2 weeks ago:
The fact that you launch into some part of your day doesn’t change that it’s gauging your mood on her end.
Maybe not, but the fact that me launching into that is an accepted and expected part of the response does.
If a manager calls me about a project and asks how I am, they don’t want me recounting an earlier frustrating interaction. As you say, they’re trying to gauge my mood, but ultimately my mood or how it came to be are irrelevant because we’re here to talk business. If I omit my headache, they don’t care.
If my GF asks me, she actually wants a response. If I omit my headache and she finds out later, she’ll be upset: “Why didn’t you say so earlier?”
That expectation is the difference.
- Comment on Airbuddy 🦛 2 weeks ago:
Only for bipedals. Quadrupedal animals can well keep a leg on the ground at all times even when moving at speed. To borrow from another comment here: Would you call a stampeding elephant “walking”?
- Comment on Anon gains a superpower 2 weeks ago:
Sauron still has a physical form during the events of LOTR. Frodo sees him through the tower window when walking towards Mount Doom, and Gollum remarks he was personally tortured by him, and that his hand has 4 fingers.
I tended to interpret that more like “appearing as a spirit”, but you may actually be right. It would explain how he was able to orchestrate and dominate his forces. There is no precedent I’m aware of that any of the Ainur would be able to influence the physical world without a physical presence.
When Isildur slew him, I believe his physical form was destroyed, but as long as a token of his power remained, it makes sense that he would be able to eventually recover enough strength to reincorporate.
Either way, without the Ring, his power was still limited. I’ll update my comment, thanks for pointing that out.
- Comment on do you think freewill truly exists? 2 weeks ago:
If a colleague asks me “Hi, how’re you doing?” it’s small talk and I’ll respond something like “Oh you know, the usual.” If my partner asks me “Hi, how was your day?” it’s a genuine question and I will respond “That fucking dickhead at work that always plays nice and personable came around with another set of “urgent” requests and no fucking clue what he’s actually asking for, whether it’s possible or why I told him last week it isn’t.”
The difference is in how serious I take the question.
- Comment on Anon discovers cigarettes 2 weeks ago:
One of my colleagues will even occasionally ask me “Heading for a smoke, wanna come along?” I just love chatting with him, I’ll try to stand upwind so I don’t catch as much second-hand smoke, he gets some company too, everyone’s happy.
- Comment on Anon gains a superpower 2 weeks ago:
It does, in fact, turn humans invisible too. Isildur being the obvious example, but even the nine rings given to humans had that effect, shifting them to the spiritual / unseen world. That’s a whole different ramble, but for now, let’s sum it up that there is an unseen world not everyone can sense and influence, but the Maiar (including Sauron) are inherently spiritual beings that took physical shape in the seen world in order to interact with it.
For Sauron, so much of his power was poured into the One Ring that he was no longer able to take physical form without it (though he evidently still had some ability to twist minds even without it). Through the Ring, he had also dominated the nine human Ring bearers and bound them to him, moving them into the spiritual world. Given that they were originally of the seen world, they could take physical form more easily than him, but as his power waned, so did theirs and they eventually disappeared until his power grew once more and allowed them to reappear.
The reason they could still “see” Frodo is that they were attuned to the unseen and could sense him there, with their power over it manifesting in them stabbing his physical form even though it was invisible to mortal eyes.
There is still the question of the Dwarven rings. They were forged first, and it’s possible they weren’t as refined yet, though the dwarves are also described as more resilient at resisting the dominating effect. My guess is that the fact they were created by Aulë, Smith of the Valar, rendered them less susceptible to the craft of a lesser spirit (Sauron), but I have no evidence.
- Comment on Black Mirror AI 3 weeks ago:
That’s war. That has been the nature of war and deterrence policy ever since industrial manufacture has escalated both the scale of deployments and the cost and destructive power of weaponry. Make it too expensive for the other side to continue fighting (or, in the case of deterrence, to even attack in the first place). If the payoff for scraping no longer justifies the investment of power and processing time, maybe the smaller ones will give up and leave you in peace.
- Comment on Let's put an end to the discussion; what is the best way? 4 weeks ago:
Let’s put an end to the discussion
lol
lmao - Comment on Einstein-Landauer culinary units 4 weeks ago:
When referencing another person’s comment, it can be helpful to link to that comment or the article you mentioned.
I’d also like to point out that many Wikipedia articles, particularly those written by experts on a given scientific subject, tend to be daunting rather than helpful for people not yet familiar with that subject.
Explanations like the one you offered in this comment and the next reply can help make topics more approachable, so I very much appreciate that.
To illustrate my point:
In this case, the article first describes the principle as “pertaining to a lower theoretical limit of energy consumption of computation”, which doesn’t directly highlight the connection to information storage. The next sentence then mentions “irreversible change in information” and “merging two computational paths”, both of which are non-trivial.
From a brief glance at the article on reversible computing linked further on, I gather that “irreversible” here doesn’t mean “you can’t flip the bit again” but rather something like “you can’t deterministically figure out the previous calculation from its result”, so the phrase boils down to “storing a piece of information” for our context. The example of “merging computational paths” probably has no particular bearing on the energy value of information either and can be ignored as well.
Figuring out the resulting logic that you so kindly laid out – again, thank you for that! – requires a degree of subject-specific understanding to know what parts of the explanation can be safely ignored.
Of course, experts want to be accurate and tend to think in terms they’re familiar with, so I don’t fault them for that. The unfortunate result is that their writings are often rather intransparent to laypeople and linking to Wikipedia articles isn’t always the best way to convey an understanding.
- Comment on Polar bears 5 weeks ago:
Maybe the targeted advertising got your location wrong?
- Comment on Cardinals most likely to be the pope 1 month ago:
I mean, this is the Catholic Church we’re talking about. They’re not particularly known for fair hiring policies.
- Comment on Some Grammaticial voices. 1 month ago:
The scientists deny any testing.
That’s active voice tho
- Comment on Some Grammaticial voices. 1 month ago:
Shouldn’t that be exothermic oxidation?
- Comment on Describe conservatives with one picture 2 months ago:
Is it me or does that post author name look like a lot of the bots named “WordWordNumber”?
- Comment on I hope she found herself 2 months ago:
Because that’s what the other person asked. “Secluded myself” isn’t really an answer. I can seclude myself counting leaves in the forest, lay down and stare at the ceiling, walk circles around my room and try to make them perfectly circular…
It’s not that you have to tell; saying “I don’t know” or “I’d rather not say” would be an answer too. But you made a snide remark regarding the other person’s reading comprehension (why?) and fail to properly comprehend their question (or mine).
- Comment on I hope she found herself 2 months ago:
…and what did you do while high?
- Comment on I hope she found herself 2 months ago:
Not me. I don’t care. The version of me that I’ve got right now is alright, I’m in no hurry to “find myself”. Either I’ll come across myself by chance or it can’t have been that important.
huffs excessive amounts of Copium
- Comment on nature is music 2 months ago:
What about Black Hole by Betraying The Martyrs?
- Comment on Space Quarry 2 months ago:
If I’d managed to stick a robot landing on a rock hurtling through space, you bet I’d be celebrating hard too
- Comment on Make gravity your bitch 2 months ago:
So what’s wrong with cumming the backstreet
- Comment on Bubble Wrap! 2 months ago:
thank you fellow german taxpayers 👍
Glad to help! And if I ever need it, I know I can count on you too.
- Comment on Virgin Physicists 2 months ago:
I mean, depending on your calculations and scale, you might go a little more precise with it. At a diameter of, say, 10m for a semicircular bridge arc, that’s a difference of 1m.
- Comment on Virgin Physicists 2 months ago:
So you just need to figure out the precise amount of prewarming, then subsequently cooling in coordination with the circuit’s load to make sure it stays at the right temperature?