Please_Do_Not

@Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Futures⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Now you bring this home, add some broth, a potato, baby, you’ve got a stew going.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How would you decorate this room?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Trampolines and a big chandelier

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Deleuze⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  What are you, schizo(analyzing) or something?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Dawkins⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Darwin’s got his finches, Dawkins has his teddy, each instrumental to the modern understanding of natural selection.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Dawkins⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  It’s actually even more unlikely that they would be able to learn how to talk. This guy’s clearly not a very good scientist if he missed that.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Helpful diagrams⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I’m sorry I still don’t totally understand. I don’t mean to be dumb, I just really wish they labeled the different parts.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Chad Diogenes⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Moore’s point is that we shouldn’t let the inability to eliminate that “what if,” which was specifically designed to be non-disprovable, actually affect ontology. That problems and questions created by philosophers basically just to stump philosophical methods should be all but ignored since, by design, there clearly can’t be an answer except that one thing is by far most likely, and the other thing cannot matter because we can’t prove or act upon it or treat it as anything other than a manufactured source of doubt/skepticism.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨TIL⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Coincidence?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Expertise⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Definitely depends on the field. Most “humanities” studies require a masters first, although for that reason many PhD programs include the step of getting your masters so it can all be done as a single track. So still a standard ~6 year program but you get both, masters after the first 3 and then PhD after 3 more. I’ve only ever run with folks in humanities I’m realizing, so I didn’t even realize there were PhDs you could get without a masters