Kalcifer
@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
- Comment on Avocado 4 weeks ago:
what a day to have eyes
- Comment on 'The Last of Us' Season 2 Finale Viewership Down 55% From Season 1 5 weeks ago:
Personally, I haven’t watched the second season because I haven’t played the second game yet. Though, in all honesty, if I haven’t played it by now, I’m likely not going to play it any time soon, so I should probably just watch the show.
- Comment on Dinner is ready 1 month ago:
bebes
I can hear this word.
- Comment on Are most people here left-wing? 2 months ago:
Could you please define exactly what you mean by “left-wing”?
- Comment on There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues 2 months ago:
- Comment on There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues 2 months ago:
[…] Boost is totally screwing up the references display
Yeah, I’ve heard report of that bug in Boost before [1] [2].
Out of curiosity, what does it look like for you?
References
1. Type: Comment. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “Happy #GlobalSwitchDay”. Author: “@squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de”. Publisher: [“Fediverse” (“!fediverse@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. Lemmy.]. Published: 2025-02-01T07:08:40Z. URI: sh.itjust.works/post/32046509.]. Published: 2025-02-02T04:56:40Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T07:51Z. URI: sh.itjust.works/post/32046509/16441818. 2. Type: Comment. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “I just wish more people were willing to try out the alternatives”. Author: “Sunshine (she/her)” (“@Sunshine@lemmy.ca”). Publisher: [“Fediverse memes” (“!fedimemes@feddit.uk”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-01-12T23:12:46Z. URI: sh.itjust.works/post/31006865.]. Published: 2025-02-05T03:39:19Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T08:00Z. URI: sh.itjust.works/post/31006865/16502481.
- Comment on There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues 2 months ago:
It’s not off-topic when the person in question is involved.
As stated in the title, the topic is concerning the AI bots that are spamming GitHub repos ^[1]^. I personally encountered the bot in nutomic’s repo ^[2]^, so I used it as an example. Given this, your comment feels off-topic.
References
1. Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T05:48Z. URI: sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627. - The title of the post is “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. 2. Type: Comment. Author: “okFduCi8nl6bRz”. Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “[Bug] Forking an article triggers notifications to be sent for every previous edit up to the point of forking.” (#129). Author: “Kalcifer” (“K4LCIFER”). Publisher: [“Nutomic/ibis”. GitHub.]. Published: 2025-04-03T00:16:06.000Z. URI: github.com/Nutomic/ibis/issues/129 (Alternative (Archive): web.archive.org/web/20250403003232/https://…/129).]. Published: 2025-04-03T00:19:44.000Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T00:58Z. URI: github.com/Nutomic/ibis/issues/129#issuecomment-2… (Alternative (Archive): web.archive.org/web/20250403003232/https://…/129#….). > Image
- Comment on There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues 2 months ago:
Maybe a joke at the expense of StackOverflow. […]
Yeah, I figured that, but I don’t understand how it’s relevant to this post.
- Comment on There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues 2 months ago:
I’m not sure I understand the relevance of your comment. Could you explain?
- Comment on There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues 2 months ago:
[…] Who’s that […]?
I presume they are referring to @nutomic@lemmy.ml ^[1]^. They are one of the main Lemmy developers ^[1.1]^.
[…] what does he have to do with this post?
I presume they are bringing up @nutomic@lemmy.ml because the example GitHub repository that I cited ^[3]^ is owned by @nutomic@lemmy.ml ^[2]^; that being said, specifically regarding their claim itself that @nutomic@lemmy.ml is transphobic ^[4]^ and is a genocide denier ^[4]^ is entirely off topic, imo.
I will make no comment on the veracity of the claim itself without further evidence. I do not wish to speak for @nutomic@lemmy.ml — I will let them speak for themself here should they wish.
References
1. Type: Webpage (Profile). Name: “@nutomic@lemmy.ml”. Publisher: [“@nutomic@lemmy.ml”. “Lemmy” (“lemmy.ml”). “Lemmy”.]. Accessed: 2025-04-03T01:58Z. URI: lemmy.ml/u/nutomic. 1. Biography. > Lemmy maintainer 2. Type: Webpage. Name: “Nutomic/ibis”. Publisher: [“Nutomic”. GitHub]. Published: 2025-04-02T14:42:54.000Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T02:00Z. URI: github.com/Nutomic/ibis. - One can see in the repository identifier “Nutomic/ibis” that it is owned by “Nutomic”. 3. Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T02:03Z. URI: sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627. > […] I recently encountered one of these AI bots in Ibis’s GitHub repository. - Ibis is the cited GitHub repository. 4. Type: Comment. Author: “Deceptichum@quokk.au”. Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. URI: sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:36:27Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T02:08Z. URI: sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627. > Eww Nutomic the transphobic genocide denier.
- Submitted 2 months ago to mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world | 14 comments
- Comment on Real 2 months ago:
Anecdotally, I have personally encountered a bug where my Linux system couldn’t handle the EDID from the monitor — so that particular model of monitor didn’t function with Linux despite it working fine on Windows.
- Comment on Definitely wasn't late to work making this 3 months ago:
Also seems the most useful cause you get two colors for the price of one.
- Comment on 3's grip looks the most comfy 3 months ago:
Given personal preference for the Uniball Vision Needle (not pictured), I’ll go for 1.
- Submitted 3 months ago to [deleted] | 6 comments
- Comment on Acorns! 3 months ago:
CMM: Trypophobia should be tagged as NSFW.
- Comment on The Downtrodden Billionaires 3 months ago:
I swear, that text looks both blurry and sharp at the same time.
- Comment on I gotta start using folders or at least labeling these somehow 3 months ago:
!trippinthroughtime@lemmy.ca
- Comment on Anon was mysterious 4 months ago:
…
- Comment on [Elon Musk] January hasn't even ended and we already have the Photo of the Year. 5 months ago:
Would putting something like “#Elon” at the end of the post accomplish the same?
- Comment on Yaay 5 months ago:
What a day to have eyes.
- Comment on Anon gets corrected 5 months ago:
Accidentally Australian /j
- Comment on [deleted] 5 months ago:
What are the obstacles in the way of leaving?
- Comment on Mitochondria 5 months ago:
[…] Which is why I’ll also assert that Literature classes as taught in later high school and into college aren’t really designed to be communication proficiency classes but art appreciation classes. […]
I think this is a fair point to make. I agree. Though, I would like to point out that that isn’t me downplaying “art appreciation”, but I agree that it is different than a subject targeted at improving clear communication.
- Comment on Anon's PC works 5 months ago:
My PC is still largely the same, in general spirit, as when I built it (c 2014-2015). But I have had to upgrade some key components over time. First was the move from a 1TB WD Blue HDD to a Samsung 860 Pro 128GB SSD (for my OS’s drive), and, related to that, at some point soon after, I moved my games drive from an HDD to an SSD. Next, I upgraded my GPU from an Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 to a Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080. This build state lasted a decently long time until I switched from Windows to Linux, so I switched my Nvidia GPU to an AMD Radeon RX 6600 (not exactly an upgrade, but more of a side-grade) to improve the user experience. The most recent change (last year, iirc?) was upgrading my RAM from 8GB DDR3, to 16GB DDR3. My CPU (Intel Core i5-4690k) is starting to really show its age, though, so I’ve been wanting to upgrade that, but that will likely entail a near rebuild of my entire system, so I’ve been avoiding it, but, unfortunately, it’s increasingly becoming more of an issue.
- Comment on It's NOG SEASON boys and girls!!!! 6 months ago:
What a day to have eyes.
- Comment on Mitochondria 6 months ago:
[…] I recommend recurring training.
For clarity, do you mean, for example, having to re-pass a drivers test to renew one’s license?
- Comment on Mitochondria 6 months ago:
Instead of adding it to a mandatory school curriculum, would you be satisfied with a more strict licensing process?
- Comment on Mitochondria 6 months ago:
More what I’m getting at, regardless of language used in Shakespeare is whether you think Shakespeare, as a whole, is obsolete. So, iiuc, you aren’t saying that you think that Shakespeare, as a whole, is obsolete, but that that the language used within it is, which makes it difficult to read?
- Comment on Mitochondria 6 months ago:
[…] I propose that teaching Shakespeare instead of more in depth driver’s ed isn’t entirely ethical. […]
I think you misunderstood me. To be completely fair, I was rather vague. I wasn’t arguing that one was more ethical than the other. My argument about ethics was from the perspective of further subsidizing something that already receives enormous subsidies — ie driving and cars (this is conjecture at the moment, but I can go into more detail if you’d like).
